Hintergrund Low-set ears are frequently associated with chromosomal disorders, malformations
               and genetic and non-genetic syndromes. They present a feature that is typically described
               in postnatal clinical exams or in genetic or paediatric textbooks for different congenital
               diseases. In a prenatal setting “low set ears” are a diagnosis that is usually made
               by ultrasound experts and their subjective evaluation. Standardized measurements or
               definitions are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare ear metrics
               and a systematic ear-eye angle measurement approach in normal fetuses and in fetuses
               with a known genetic or non-genetic syndrome/malformation in 3D volumes of the fetal
               ear.
            
               Methoden This is retrospective study based on stored 3D ultrasound volumes of the fetal head
               collected during routine exams in the second and third trimester. The “ear-eye angle”
               and the length of the ear were measured by two trained examiners in healthy fetuses
               and in fetuses with malformation or a genetic or non-genetic syndrome. To avoid measurement-bias,
               the outcome was blinded to the examiners.
            
               Ergebnisse We compared 40 ears of postnatal confirmed healthy fetuses with five cases of fetuses
               with a genetic syndrome or malformation (syndrome group). The 3D ear image was taken
               at a median of 21 weeks' gestation (17-32). On average, the ears of the fetuses
               with chromosomal abnormalities were lower-set with a larger ear- eye angle of 4.25°
               (2,66°-7,88°) compared to the control group of 1.26° ( -8,5°- 7,5°). The length of
               the ears between fetuses from the syndrome group and fetuses from the control group
               was a median of 14,8mm (11,3- 17,8mm) and 14,5 (8,3- 24,6mm).
            
               Schlussfolgerung Systematic evaluation of the fetal ear on routinely collected 3D volumes is feasible
               and can be standardized. In this small sample size of collected normal and abnormal
               fetuses the median ear-eye angle is larger compared to the control group while the
               ear length was very similar. Further evaluation with a larger sample size is need.