Keywords
malignant melanoma - hypofractionated radiotherapy - anorectal melanoma
Introduction
Mucosal melanomas generally arise from mucosal epithelium lining the respiratory,
alimentary and genitourinary tracts and usually carry worse prognosis than cutaneous
melanomas. In the US, mucosal melanomas make up just 1.3% of all melanomas.[1] Anorectal melanomas account for 50% of gastrointestinal tract melanomas and 0.3
to 1% of all malignant melanomas.[2]
[3] With a mean presentation age of 52.8 years, it occurs more commonly in females than
in males.[4]
[5] There are no specific treatment guidelines due to the scarcity of the disease, its
unique biology, and challenges in management owing to the anatomic location.
Case Presentation
A 50-year-old woman from Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, a farmer by occupation, presented
to the hospital complaining of rectal bleeding for two months, sometimes associated
with mildly-painful defecation. She had undergone abdomino-perineal resection with
colostomy on March 20, 2023. The postoperative histopathological report was suggestive
of a 4 × 2 × 1-cm growth, 1 cm from the anal canal. There was another growth 5 cm
from the anal canal measuring 2 × 2 × 1 cm. Microscopy was suggestive of malignant
melanoma with transmural infiltration reaching up to the serosa ([Fig. 1]). Resection margins were free of tumor, and no lymph nodes were identified. Postoperative
contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen and pelvis was done, and
it was suggestive of focally-enhanced presacral soft tissue density measuring 45 × 40 mm,
along with thickening in the mesorectal fascia, extending up to the bilateral sacral
ala ([Fig. 2]). Re-surgery was denied; patient underwent positron-emission tomography CT (PET-CT)
to decide further course of adjuvant therapy. The PET-CT was suggestive of a hypodense
area with peripheral rim of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the presacral region,
with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 9.70. Intense area of increased
FDG uptake was seen in continuity of this lesion in the region of the anal canal/postsurgical
site, with an SUVmax of 10.70 ([Fig. 3]). In view of non-affordability to immunotherapy, the patient was started on adjuvant
chemotherapy on October 23, 2023, with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 D1-D4; vinblastine 1.6 mg/m2 D1-D5, and dacarbazine 800 mg/m2 D1 every 3 weeks. The patient did not tolerate chemotherapy
well, and after 3 cycles of chemotherapy she was referred for local radiotherapy in
view of the disease not being metastatic. A dose of 45 Gy in 15 fractions by 6 MV
photons by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was delivered was 18-12-23
to 20-1-24. Three months following hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), the melanoma
had completely regressed, and there was no evidence of residual cutaneous pigmentation
or anal canal extension. At 12 months after presentation, in view of the patient's
financial situation, PET-CT was could not be afforded, so the follow-up was done with
CECT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, which was not suggestive of any abnormal thickening
or enhancement. At 24 months after the diagnosis, a PET-CT was performed, which was
with no evidence of any clinically-significant hypermetabolism anywhere in the body
([Fig. 4]). The patient is currently free of long-term radiation side effects, and there is
no clinical indication of recurrence. The patient has no complaints at present and
is doing well with her routine activities.
Fig. 1 Histopathological picture: (A) sheets and nests of tumor cells; (B) malignant melanoma cells with pigment.
Fig. 2 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis showing
enhanced presacral soft tissue: (A) axial view; (B) sagittal view.
Fig. 3 Postoperative positron-emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scan suggestive
of hypodense area with peripheral rim of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the
presacral region: (A) axial view; (B) sagittal view.
Fig. 4 Positron-emission tomography–computed tomography scan: No evidence of any clinically
significant hypermetabolism anywhere in the body: (A) axial view; (B) maximum intensity projection image.
Discussion
Anorectal melanoma is an uncommon, aggressive cancer with vague signs. Its incidence
is reported to be higher in females than in males and it increases with age. It usually
has poor prognosis, and there is still uncertainty regarding its treatment. Surgery,
radiotherapy, chemo-immunotherapy, and targeted therapy provide inconsistent results.
The cornerstone of treatment is still surgical resection; however, the best surgical
approach for primary tumors is debatable and can range from an abdominoperineal resection
(APR) to extensive local excision or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Sometimes
EMR can eliminate melanoma while maintaining long-term survival.[6] Wide local excision (WLE) preserves the anal sphincter and has very little morbidity
or damage to local function.[7] Abdominoperineal resection is frequently linked to high risk of morbidity and functional
impairment. There are no appreciable changes in patient survival between APR and WLE,
according to the limited number of studies.
There is not much research on the benefits of radiation therapy in anorectal malignant
melanoma, either with or without surgery, and radiation is not the norm currently.
Studies have shown benefit in local recurrence rate with the addition of radiotherapy
after WLE without any overall survival benefit.[8] Because anorectal melanomas are thought to be radioresistant, radiotherapy is rarely
suggested for them, even for palliation.[9]
[10] A high degree of uncertainty exists regarding the benefit of radiation therapy or
chemotherapy. As our understanding of the biology and immunology of advanced melanoma
advances, the therapy used to treat this illness is changing quickly. According to
the findings of palliative irradiation for cutaneous melanoma, around half of the
patients can achieve complete remission, whereas 72% of patients with head and neck
mucosal melanomas treated with radiotherapy alone have achieved complete remission.[11]
[12]
[13]
[14] There have been reports of people with head and neck cutaneous melanomas benefiting
from radiation treatment as an adjunct to surgery. Seen the results of radiotherapy
in other sites, it is also being used in the adjuvant setting in anorectal melanomas.
Radiotherapy in the dose of 45 (range: 36–52.5) Gy with a median of 15 fractions (range:
12–17) demonstrated that HFRT is a safe and efficient local therapeutic option that
offers melanoma patients sustained local control with minimal toxicity.[15] Whenever feasible, immunotherapy should be pursued as an alternative treatment modality;
however, in situations like ours, when non-resectability and financial toxicity tilt
the tide, radiation plays an intrinsically advantageous function. Without suffering
any severe side effects, the patient reacted quite well to radiation therapy, which
might provide an additional option for managing this difficult condition. Specifically,
radiation treatment can be utilized for more than only palliation; it can also be
used for local disease control.
Bibliographical Record
Vandana Thakur, Poorva Vias, Hardik Sharma, Pratibha Prashar, Aditya Jamwal, Anupam
Thakur. The Potential of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: A Revolutionary Treatment
for Anorectal Malignant Melanomas. Brazilian Journal of Oncology 2025; 21: s00451812295.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1812295
