Background Evidence shows that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a safe and feasible
alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and is superior in improving
clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, due to
the absence of consensus on an optimal HIIT protocol, it has not yet been included
in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) guidelines. Novel, evidence-based HIIT protocols are
therefore warranted for patients with CAD.
Research Question Is the low-volume whole-body HIIT program of Kristiansen et al. (2022) internally
valid, and can the proposed training program thus be applied with confidence in clinical
physiotherapy practice?
Methods Internal validity was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. External
validity was assessed using the i-CONTENT tool. Considerations regarding clinical
relevance were made to ensure a comprehensive recommendation for clinical practice.
Results Nine out of thirteen items on the JBI checklist were met, two were not met, and two
were unclear. Six out of seven items on the i-CONTENT tool indicated a low risk of
ineffectiveness. One item indicated a high risk of ineffectiveness. The effect size
estimate on peak VO2 is subject to debate.
Conclusion Low-volume HIIT could serve as an additional alternative to traditional endurance
training in CR. However, the protocol by Kristiansen et al. (2022) is not sufficiently
effective in its current form. Further high-quality research is needed to determine
optimal protocol variables such as intensity, duration, frequency and recovery.
Reference to the congress theme This critical appraisal bachelor thesis reflects the “PhysioForward” theme by highlighting
the potential of HIIT as a time-efficient and individualized alternative in physiotherapy-led
CR. Future studies should focus on optimizing HIIT models rather than comparing them
to MICT. Improving long-term adherence in patients with CAD is essential; early evidence
suggests HIIT may encourage better compliance due to lower time demands. By bridging
the gap between evidence and practice, this bachelor thesis supports physiotherapists
in shaping the future of CR through innovative, evidence-based interventions.