A 77-year-old woman was admitted because she had been passing tarry stools for 1 week.
               She had a past medical history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and uremia
               requiring dialysis. Following negative upper endoscopy and colonoscopy examinations,
               she underwent double-balloon enteroscopy. Several blood clots were found in the jejunum
               and a source of active bleeding was found after 2 hours’ examination (Figure [1]). Injection therapy with a total of 3 ml of 1 in 10 000 epinephrine in hypertonic
               saline resulted in initial hemostasis, but the bleeding recurred 2 days later. The
               patient required surgical intervention, when segmental ecchymosis of the intestine
               was observed, 280 cm from the ileocecal valve (Figure [2]). The remaining small intestine was unremarkable. Subsequent histological examination
               revealed ischemic necrosis, involving only 1.5 cm of the resected intestine, which
               we believed corresponded with the injection site. The patient experienced no further
               bleeding over a 6-month period after the operation.
            
            
             
                  Figure 1 Endoscopic view showing active bleeding from a mucosal fold (arrow). The adjacent
                     intestinal mucosa was intact. It was difficult to visualize the source of bleeding,
                     but it was presumed to be a bleeding angiodysplastic lesion.
               
            
            
             
                  Figure 2 Macroscopic view of the resected small intestine. Note the band-like ischemic change
                     (arrows).
               
            
            
            Since the introduction of double-balloon enteroscopy [1], endoscopists have been expected to perform an increasing number of diagnostic and
               therapeutic procedures involving the small intestine using this technique [2]
               [3]. However, experience of therapeutic endoscopy in the small intestine is limited
               and we experienced two problems related to the procedure in this patient. Firstly,
               endoscopic examination for the investigation of active small-bowel bleeding is particularly
               difficult: prolonged procedure times and large volumes of irrigation fluids may be
               required, and patient intolerance and fluid overload are potential problems. Secondly,
               injection therapy, using a variety of solutions, has been deployed in order to control
               peptic ulcer bleeding [4]. In this patient, the finding of intestinal necrosis at the injection site highlighted
               the problems of the optimal volume and the safety of solutions used for injection
               therapy in the small intestine. Advanced age, atherosclerotic vascular disease, anemia,
               hypoxemia, and shock are all associated with intestinal necrosis following injection
               thearpy [5]. In addition, the thinner wall of the small intestine may make this complication
               more likely during double-balloon enteroscopy. Therapeutic endoscopists should be
               aware of this complication. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the safety of
               endoscopic procedures when applied to the small intestine.
            
            
            
               Competing Interests: None
            
            
            Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AI_2AD