References
- 1
Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Itoi T. et al .
Prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by
an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2007;
5
1339-1346
- 2
Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G. et al .
Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis?
A meta-analysis of controlled trials.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
60
544-550
- 3
Freeman M L.
Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
pancreatitis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2007;
5
1354-1365
- 4
Brackbill S, Young S, Schoenfeld P, Elta G.
A survey of physician practices on prophylactic pancreatic stents.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
45-52
- 5
Uchida N, Kamada K, Tsutsui K. et al .
Utility of pancreatic duct brushing for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.
J Gastroenterol.
2007;
42
657-662
- 6
Di Stasi M, Lencioni R, Solmi L. et al .
Ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses: results of a multicenter
study.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1998;
93
1329-1333
- 7
Vandervoort J, Soetikno R M, Montes H. et al .
Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic
duct.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
322-327
- 8
Pugliese V, Pujic N, Saccomanno S. et al .
Pancreatic intraductal sampling during ERCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis
and pancreatic cancer: cytologic studies and k-ras-2 codon 12 molecular analysis in
47 cases.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
595-599
- 9
McGuire D E, Venu R P, Brown R D. et al .
Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
44
300-304
- 10
Lawrence C, Howell D A, Stefan A M. et al .
Disconnected pancreatic tail syndrome: potential for endoscopic therapy and results
of long-term follow-up.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
673-679
- 11
Pelaez-Luna M, Vege S S, Petersen B T. et al .
Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis: clinical and imaging
characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of 31 cases.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
68
91-97
- 12
Gillams A R, Kurzawinski T, Lees W R.
Diagnosis of duct disruption and assessment of pancreatic leak with dynamic secretin-stimulated
MR cholangiopancreatography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2006;
186
499-506
- 13
Deviere J, Bueso H, Baize M. et al .
Complete disruption of the main pancreatic duct: endoscopic management.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
42
445-451
- 14
Kozarek R A, Ball T J, Patterson D J. et al .
Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic
fluid collections.
Gastroenterology.
1991;
100
1362-1370
- 15
Varadarajulu S, Noone T C, Tutuian R. et al .
Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary
stent placement.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
568-575
- 16
Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali M A. et al .
Pancreatic-fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal
after endoscopic transmural drainage.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
609-619
- 17
Kalapala R, Sunitha L, Nageshwar R D. et al .
Virtual MR pancreatoscopy in the evaluation of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis.
J Pancreas.
2008;
9
220-225
- 18
Sata N, Kurihara K, Koizumi M. et al .
CT virtual pancreatoscopy: a new method for diagnosing intraductal papillary mucinous
neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas.
Abdom Imaging.
2006;
31
326-331
- 19
Sugimoto M, Yasuda H, Koda K. et al .
Virtual CO2 MDCT pancreatography: a new feasible technique for minimally invasive
pancreatectomy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
Hepatogastroenterology.
2008;
55
270-274
Fabien Fumex
HÂpital Edouard Herriot – Hepatogastroentérologie
Place d'Arsonval
Lyon 69008
France
Fax: +33-4-72110147
Email: fabien.fumex@chu-lyon.fr
