Which kind of anti-embolism stockings – up to knee or up to thigh – are more effective?

Summary

Aim

To evaluate the preventative effect of knee-length and thigh-length anti-embolism stockings (AES).

Methodology

The databases PubMed, Cochrane Library and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) reports were searched for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines using the search terms “thrombosis prevention” and “anti-embolism stockings”.

Results

Two productive guidelines and two very extensive systematic reviews were found, all published between 2010 and 2015. Both the NICE and SIGN guidelines recommend knee-length or thigh-length anti-embolism stockings (AES), whereas four reviews found no consistent results in the prevention of thrombosis. There is no clear difference in the preventative effects of the two types of AES: - It is not possible to calculate the preventative effect of the two types of AES, because the various studies are significantly heterogeneous. - The preventative effect of the thigh-length AES combined with pharmacotherapy shows a non-significant positive trend. - The preventative effect of a thigh-length AES plus pharmacotherapy is more effective than that of a knee-length AES plus pharmacotherapy.

Keywords

Anti-embolism stocking - thromboprophylaxis

Interessenkonflikt

Nach Angaben der Autoren bestehen keine Interessenkonflikte.

• References

• 1 AWMF-S3-Leitlinie. Prophylaxe der venösen Thromboembolie. AWMF-de. 2015
• 2 Cochrane Library. Kneelength versus thigh length graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in postoperative surgical patients. 2012
• 3 Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA. et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. 9th ed. American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (02) Suppl: e278S-e325S.
• 4 Wade R, Sideris E, Paton F. et al. Graduated compression stockings for the prevention of deep-vein-thrombosis in postoperative surgical patients: a systematic review and economic model with a value of information analysis. Health Technology Assessment 2015; 19.
• 5 Lawrence D, Kakkar VV. Graduated, static, external compression of the lower limb: a physiological assessment. Br J Surg 1980; 67: 119-121.
• 6 Monagle P, Chan HKS, Goldenberg NA. et al. Anti-thrombotic therapy in neonates and children. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. 9th ed.: American College of Chest Physicians. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (02) Suppl: e737S-e801S.
• 7 NICE-Guideline (2010) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Using VTE prophylaxis.
• 8 Samama CM, Albaladejo P, Benhamou D. et al. Venous thromboembolism prevention in surgery and obstetrics: clinical practice guideline. Eur J An-aesthes 2006; 28: 95-116.
• 9 Sigel M, Edelstein AL, Savitch L. et al. Type of compression for reducing venous stasis: A study of lower extremities during inactive recumbency. Arch Surg 1975; 110: 171-175.
• 10 SIGN-Guideline (2014) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines: Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism.
• 11 Sparrow RA, Hardy JG, Fentem PH. Effect of anti-embolism compression hosiery on the leg blood volume. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 53-59.