White Roll Vermilion turn down flap in primary unilateral cleft lip repair: A novel approach

ABSTRACT

Aim: Numerous modifications of Millard′s technique of rotation - advancement repair have been described in literature. This article envisions a new modification in Millard’s technique of primary unilateral chieloplasty. Material and Methods: Eliminating or reducing the secondary deformities in children with cleft lip has been a motivating factor for the continual refinement of cleft lip surgical techniques through the years. Vermilion notching, visibility of paramedian scars and scar contracture along the white roll are quite noticeable in close-up view even in good repairs. Any scar is less noticeable if it is in midline or along the lines of embryological closure. White Roll Vermilion turn down Flap (WRV Flap), a modification in the Millard’s repair is an attempt to prevent these secondary deformities during the primary cleft lip sugery. This entails the use of white roll and the vermilion from the lateral lip segment for augmenting the medial lip vermilion with the final scar in midline at the vermilion. Result: With an experience of more than 100 cases of primary cleft lip repair with this technique, we have achieved a good symmetry and peaking of cupid’s bow with no vermilion notching of the lips. Conclusion: WRV flap aims to high light the importance of achieving a near normal look of the cleft patient with the only drawback of associated learning curve with this technique.

KEY WORDS

Unilateral chieloplasty - WRV flap - whistle deformity - embryological cleft lip repair - turn down flap - modified Millard’s repair - Primary cleft lip repair - secondary cleft lip deformity

 

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Stal S, Brown RH, Higuera S, Hollier Jr LH, Byrd HS, Cutting CB. et al. Fifty years of the Millard rotation-advancement: Looking back and moving forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1364-77
• 2 Mulliken JB, Martínez-Pérez D. The principle of rotation advancement for repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity: Technical variations and analysis of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1247-60
• 3 Sitzman TJ, Girotto JA, Marcus JR. Current surgical practices in cleft care: Unilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 261e-70e
• 4 Lazarus DD, Hudson DA, van Zyl JE, Fleming AN, Fernandes D. Repair of unilateral cleft lip: A comparison of five techniques. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41: 587-94
• 5 Sykes JM. Management of the cleft lip deformity. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2001; 9: 37-50
• 6 Sadler TW. Langmans Medical Embryology. 6 th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1990
• 7 Senders CW, Peterson EC, Hendrickx AG, Cukierski MA. Development of the upper lip. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5: 16-25
• 8 Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B. et al. The Eurocleft project 1996-2000: Overview. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 131-40
• 9 Reddy SG, Reddy RR, Bronkhorst EM, Prasad R, Kuijpers Jagtman AM, Bergé S. Comparison of three incisions to repair complete unilateral cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1208-16
• 10 Reddy GS, Webb RM, Reddy RR, Reddy LV, Thomas P, Markus AF. Choice of incision for primary repair of unilateral complete cleft lip: A comparative study of outcomes in 796 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 932-40
• 11 Millard Jr DR. A radical rotation in single harelip. Am J Surg 1958; 95: 318-22
• 12 Millard Jr DR. Complete unilateral clefts of the lip. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1960; 25: 595-605
• 13 Millard Jr DR. Refinements in rotation-advancement cleft lip technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964; 33: 26-38
• 14 Millard DR. Extensions of the rotation-advancement principle for wide unilateral cleft lips. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42: 535-44
• 15 Noordhoff MS. Reconstruction of vermilion in unilateral and bilateral cleft lips. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 52-61
• 16 Shaw WC, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, Roberts CT, Semb G. The Eurocleft study: Intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 5: Discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42: 93-8