KEY WORDS
Allocombo - Capanna procedure - vascularised fibula with allograft
INTRODUCTION
Resection of tumours of the femur and tibia around the knee and ankle joints results
in large bony defects.[[1]] While prosthesis offers a reconstructive option,[[2]] often arthrodesis is an alternative; in case, adequate functional motors cannot
be preserved or due to economic constraints (for those patients who cannot afford
megaprosthesis). In an immunocompromised patient, the potential for infection and
non-union increases if a non-vascularised bone graft is used.[[3]
[4]] Thus, a vascularised fibula is the best form of reconstruction in such cases. The
vascularised fibular flap (pedicled or free) can be used in combination with an allograft.
We refer to such a combination reconstruction as ‘allocombo.’ The vascularised fibula
provides the potential for biological incorporation and the irradiated allograft offers
early mechanical strength. The vascularised fibular graft hypertrophies in due course
of time, and till that period, the allograft provides the required mechanical strength
to allow early ambulation. The goal of our work was to analyse the results of vascularised
fibular graft to bridge the defect resulting after tumour resection.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
A retrospective study of 24 [[Table 1]] of vascularised fibular graft for lower limb reconstruction was conducted at our
centre from February 2003 to March 2014. In 20 cases, resection and reconstruction
were done at the same time. Of the remaining four, one was removal of antibiotic spacer;
total knee replacement prosthesis removal was done in two cases and in one, removal
of the allograft with the plate was done.
Table 1
Overview of cases
Patient
|
Age (years)
|
Sex
|
Intercalary or arthrodesis
|
Provisional diagnosis
|
Free or pedicled
|
Site of tumour
|
Allograft
|
Defect
|
Length of fibula harvested
|
Type
|
Advanced/flipped
|
Surgery done
|
Primary excision
|
MSTS score (1 year, last follow-up)
|
PNET: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, GCT: Giant-cell tumour, OGS: Osteogenic sarcoma,
TKR: Total knee replacement, DCP: Dynamic compression plate, W/E: Wide Excision, Local
Excision, D/E: Distal End U/E: Upper/End
|
1
|
13
|
Male
|
Intercalary
|
PNET
|
Free C/L
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
16.5
|
20.5
|
|
|
Removal of AB spacer-free fibula arthrodesis + plating
|
No
|
No follow-up
|
2
|
14
|
Male
|
Ankle arthrodesis
|
PNET
|
Free
|
Tibia
|
No
|
10.5
|
22
|
|
|
W/E+live fibular transfer
|
Yes
|
24, 26
|
3
|
15
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
OGS
|
Free C/L
|
Knee
|
Yes
|
16.5
|
21
|
|
|
Live fibula reconstruction
|
Yes
|
Expired
|
4
|
16
|
Male
|
Intercalary
|
OGS
|
Free C/L
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
18.5
|
23
|
|
|
Knee arthrodesis with double fibular autograft struts
|
Yes
|
Expired
|
5
|
16
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Pedicled
|
Knee-distal femur
|
No
|
10
|
23
|
|
Advanced
|
Wide excision + pedicle fibula arthrodesis
|
Yes
|
28, 30
|
6
|
16
|
Male
|
Intercalary
|
OGS
|
Pedicled
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
12
|
23
|
|
Advanced
|
TKR removal + pedicled fibula knee arthrodesis + DCP
|
No
|
Flap loss, expired
|
7
|
18
|
Male
|
Ankle arthrodesis
|
PNET
|
Free
|
Tibia
|
No
|
8
|
20.5
|
Double barrel
|
|
W/E + knee arthrodesis + live fibula doubled + Ex fix
|
Yes
|
Expired
|
8
|
19
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
Osteosarcoma
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
21
|
26.5
|
|
|
W/E with knee arthrodesis + allograft + plate
|
Yes
|
26, 27
|
9
|
21
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Free
|
Tibia
|
No
|
20
|
26
|
|
|
Live fibula arthrodesis+flap cover
|
Yes
|
No follow-up
|
10
|
21
|
Male
|
Intercalary
|
Periosteal OGS
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
18
|
24.5
|
|
|
Live fibula reconstruction after W/E femur
|
Yes
|
Distal nonunion
|
11
|
22
|
Male
|
Ankle arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Free
|
Knee-Prx Tib
|
No
|
13
|
26
|
|
|
W/E with live fibula alloarthrodesis
|
Yes
|
25, 27
|
12
|
24
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
Osteosarcoma
|
Free
|
Shaft femur
|
Yes
|
21.5
|
25.5
|
|
|
Wide excision + live fibula allograft combo arthrodesis
|
Yes
|
Fracture of allograft
|
13
|
26
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
25
|
28
|
|
|
W/E + knee arthrodesis with allo + live fibula combo
|
Yes
|
22, 24
|
14
|
28
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
Osteosarcoma
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
21
|
24.5
|
|
|
W/E + live fibula + plating
|
Yes
|
Expired
|
15
|
29
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
16.5
|
24.5
|
|
|
W/E U/E tibia + live fibula arthrodesis
|
Yes
|
No follow-up
|
16
|
32
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
Chondrosarcoma lt. femur L/E
|
Free
|
Femur
|
No
|
10
|
25
|
Double barrel
|
|
Excision + double-barrel live fibular graft + knee arthrodesis
|
Yes
|
No follow-up
|
17
|
32
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
17.5
|
26
|
|
|
W/E + live fibula + custom plate
|
Yes
|
19, 20
|
18
|
33
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Pedicled
|
Femur
|
No
|
9.5
|
25
|
|
Flipped
|
Removal of allograft and plate+live fibula graft and fixation
|
No
|
Amputation secondary to disease
|
19
|
34
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
OGS
|
Free
|
Femur
|
No
|
10.5
|
27
|
Double barrel
|
|
W/E + double-barrel live fibula
|
Yes
|
Expired
|
20
|
39
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
GCT
|
Free
|
Tibia
|
No
|
13.5
|
23
|
|
|
W/E + live fibula arthrodesis
|
Yes
|
23, 25
|
21
|
39
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
Osteosarcoma
|
Pedicled
|
Ankle
|
No
|
11.5
|
26
|
|
Flipped
|
W/E + pedicled fibula + allograft
|
Yes
|
27, 30
|
22
|
39
|
Male
|
Arthrodesis
|
OGS parosteal D/E femur left
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
18.5
|
27
|
|
|
Live fibula-allocombo with DCS fixation after removal of implant
|
No
|
Expired
|
23
|
40
|
Male
|
Intercalary
|
Adamantinoma L/E tibia recurrent
|
Pedicled
|
Tibia
|
No
|
17.5
|
26
|
|
Flipped
|
Intercalary excision with live fibula allocombo
|
Yes
|
25, 26
|
24
|
32
|
Female
|
Arthrodesis
|
OGS parosteal femur
|
Free
|
Femur
|
Yes
|
15.5
|
21
|
|
|
Excision + free fibula knee arthrodesis
|
Yes
|
Expired
|
The histopathologic diagnosis was Giant-cell tumour (n = 8), Ewing's sarcoma (n =3), osteosarcoma (n =8), periosteal tumour (n =3) chondrosarcoma (n =1) and adamantinoma (n =1). Eight were female and 16 were male with the mean age of 26 years (range: 13–40
years). The average defect size was 15.5 cm (minimum of 8 cm and a maximum of 25 cm)
and the average length of the fibula harvested was 24.35 cm (minimum = 20.5 cm and
maximum = 28 cm). The length of fibula harvested is always much more than the defect.
Harvesting long length of fibula ensures easier dissection of the peroneal pedicle,
thus longer pedicle length. Nineteen free fibular flaps (FFFs) and five pedicled fibula
were done. Double-barrel fibula was done in three cases. Wherever double barrel was
possible, it was preferred over allograft as it provides more vascularised bone stock.
If the defect is small about 8–10 cm and pedicle length required is not much, only
then double barrel is possible. For double barrel, distal segment has to flip up.
For this, we need to excise at least 2 cm of bone for smooth curving of the pedicle.
However, a combination of double barrel and allograft is not possible due to space
constraints.
Intercalary reconstruction was done for 5 cases and arthrodesis for 19 cases (3 for
ankle and 16 for knee). For ankle arthrodesis, free fibula was always used. Advancement
of fibula distally towards the ankle results in traction of the peroneal vessels.
Suitable internal fixation using a combination of plates, screws and K-wires was used
to stabilise the construct Suitable strut allografts were obtained from the hospital
tissue bank.[[5]]
Preoperatively, the site, size and involvement of the soft tissues were assessed in
consultation with the orthopaedic colleagues. For defects within 14 cm above the knee
joint, we planned pedicled fibula and free for defects beyond this. For segmental
defects of the tibia, tibialisation of the fibula was done, but we have not included
those cases for the present study.
Pedicled fibula
Harvest of the fibula flap
The reach of pedicled fibula is comfortable for 14 cm defects above the knee joint.
Posterior tibial artery division improves the reach in larger defects. The posterior
tibial artery was divided only in one case of the total five pedicled cases (20%),
as the pedicled fibula was just falling short by 1 cm. The division of posterior tibial
artery improved the reach proximally by about 2 cm as now, the pivot point shifted
to the origin of the anterior tibial artery. No pre-operative angiography was done
in this case; however, vascular clamps were applied for 20 min on the posterior tibial
artery before its division to ascertain the limb vascularity. In other pedicled cases,
division of posterior tibial artery was not required as the reach was adequate even
without its division.
After the excision of the tumour, the fibula flap was harvested using the standard
anterior approach. The ipsilateral fibular head increases the pedicle length requirement
in the pedicled fibula, as the vessels have to curve around it. Thus, fibular head
is also harvested (taking care to preserve the common peroneal nerve) with fibula
providing with a longer bone and in all cases when pedicled fibula is used, it reduces
the bulk on the lateral aspect of the knee and improves the reach. The fibular flap
was harvested with the head of the fibula along with the maximum length of the fibula
available leaving behind 6 cm of the fibula close to the ankle joint. The peroneal
vessels are divided at the lower end.
The fibula can be transposed in the defect by either advancing (the upper end of the
fibula reaches the upper end of the defect) or by flipping it 180° [[Figure 1a-c]], so that the lower end of the fibula reaches the upper part of the defect. Flipping
improves the reach of the fibula in the upper defects. Pedicled fibula was advanced
in two cases (40%) and flipped in three cases (60%). The fibular head was excised
in all cases of pedicled fibula as it reduces the arc of rotation of the peroneal
vessels carrying the fibula.
Figure 1: Pedicled fibula being transposed to a defect in the femur. (a) Line diagram to show
fibula being advanced and flipped 180°. (b) Pedicled fibula harvested and being flipped
180° to reach defect in the femur. (c) Fibula flipped 180° to reach the defect
Allo-fibula fixation
One side of the allograft cortex is removed to enable fibula to nestle in the allograft
[[Figure 2]]. The length of allograft required is equal to the defect size and the fibula projects
out 1 cm on either side so that it can be pegged in the medullary cavity of the femur
and/or tibia [[Figure 3a and b]]. The allograft is fixed using plate and screws, and the fibula is secured using
K-wire fixation [[Figure 4]].
Figure 2: Irradiated and non-antigenic tibial allograft obtained from the bone bank. The allograft
is reamed to create a slot for the fibula
Figure 3: (a) Fibula fixed in the slot of allograft with both fibular ends projecting out to
be pegged into the femur on both sides of the defect. (b) The fibula+allograft in
the defect
Figure 4: Allocombo fixed with plate and screws and both ends of the fibula pegged in the medullary
cavity of the femur and/or tibia
Free fibula with allograft
In cases where the ipsilateral fibula is not available or where the defect is too
high up or where the knee joint is not sacrificed, it is usually not possible to use
pedicled fibula and then either ipsilateral fibula or contralateral fibula as a free
flap is used. The entire procedure remains the same except that microvascular anastomosis
is required. The recipient vessels may be descending branch of the lateral circumflex
femoral vessels most of the times. Descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral
vessels are the vessels which supply anterolateral aspect of the thigh and is frequently
harvested with the anterolateral thigh flaps, thus a relatively constant, familiar
and easy to dissect the vessel. It lies just behind the rectus femoris muscle. Even
femoral vessels with end-to-side anastomosis using saphenous vein graft were required
in four cases.
In two cases, pedicled fibula was converted into the free vascularised flap. In one
case, during fixation of the fibular flap, the peroneal vessel avulsed and anastomosis
was then done with the anterolateral thigh flap pedicle. In a second case, the vessel
was getting compressed with the femoral condyle and developed a thrombus in the vessels.
A venous graft was required and anastomosis was done end-to-side with the femoral
vessels.
Statistical methods
Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) Scores.
It was normally distributed. The MSTS scores improved over time as checked by the
paired t-test (P < 0.0001). The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (Version 25,
IBM SPSS Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The mean follow-up time was 52 months (28 months to 109 months). In three cases, skin
paddle necrosis was observed but no fibular loss. Of the total 24 vascularised fibula
flaps (VFFs), one flap was lost due to vascular compromise secondary to infection,
resulting in amputation. This patient later died due to the disease.
Thus, free flap success rate was 96%. One patient required additional bone grafting
for distal non-union in a total of (23 × 2 = 46) bone ends. Successful healing was
achieved at 45 ends (97.8%). Guarded partial weight-bearing using walking assists
started once evidence of bony union started. It is averaged at about 3-month post-operative.
The patient was referred to physiotherapist for proper training of partial weight-bearing.
It was progressed to eventual full weight-bearing over the next 6–8-week time. Radiological
evidence of union [[Figure 5]] at osteotomy sites occurred at an average of 6.8 months (5 months to 23 months).
In one patient, 2 years after the allocombo surgery, the allograft had not incorporated,
but both the superior and inferior osteotomy sites had united, thus the patient was
allowed weight-bearing. The vascularised fibular graft had a segmental fracture; this
patient required amputation secondary to recurrence.
Figure 5: X-ray showing radiological union 1-year post-operative
Eight patients eventually succumbed to disease. Two were local recurrences. At the
final follow-up, the mean of MSTS’ functional score of the evaluable patients was
26 (range: 20–30). We had prepared two tables for MSTS score, one at 12 months and
one at the final follow-up. MSTS score had improved [[Table 2]].
Table 2
The musculoskeletal tumour society scores over time
12 months
|
Follow-up
|
P
|
24.33±2.74
|
26.11±3.06
|
<0.0001
|
DISCUSSION
The options available after excision of extremity bony tumours are either amputation
or limb salvage.
Limb salvage is currently the procedure of choice, as it has been proven that the
oncologic outcome is not compromised and the quality of life is much superior as compared
to amputation.[[6]]
Involvement of major neurovascular bundles, massive soft-tissue resections or severe
infections are relative contraindications for limb salvage.[[7]]
Knee prosthesis is the ideal reconstructive option,[[8]] but often due to the massive resections, endoprosthesis is not possible and arthrodesis
is an alternative option to give a stable, durable and pain-free reconstruction.[[3]
[4]]
The Ilizarov technique is another option to deal with such defects, but time required
and requirement of chemotherapy in patients restrict the use of this technique. In
this subset of patients, pin-tract infections and interference with callus formation
are frequent due to aggressive chemotherapy.[[9]]
Capanna first reported the use of allograft combined with autologous fibular flap
for lower extremity reconstruction after tumour resections. Vascularised fibula alone
is too weak to allow early ambulation and intercalary allograft alone leads to delayed
union, non-union or fractures, thus a combination of the two solves the problem. The
outer shell of the allograft provides the mechanical strength required for weight-bearing
and the inner core of the vascularised fibula provides for the vascularity, thus ensuring
good healing.[[9]]
Belt P.J. and Dickinson I.C. reported that the complication rates with allograft alone
were high and the allograft non-union rate was 50%; they further noted that the FFF
hastens time to full weight bearing but does not appear to affect the complication
rates of the allograft.[[10]] The allograft with VFF union rate in our series was 97.8%. In our series, eight
patients succumbed to disease and four were lost to follow-up. A total of three bone
complications (one flap loss, one distal non-union and one segmental fracture) occurred
of the total 13 patients with long-term follow-up. The complication rate thus came
to 23%. Further, in the series by Belt and Dickinson, the mean time to full–weight-bearing
in the lower limb cases was 7.5 months and 100% were full-weight-bearing at 18 months.
Whereas in our study, guarded partial weight-bearing using walking assists progressed
to eventual full-weight-bearing once evidence of bony union was seen on radiographs.
Standard biplanar radiographs were assessed. Bridging across three of four cortices
in biplanar radiographs was considered evidence of union at an average of 6.8 months
(5 months to 23 months). Please refer [Table 3] for Comparison of various factors with other studies and [Table 4] for Kaplan–Meier survival chart
Table 3
Comparison of various factors with other studies
Studies diseasefree survival (years)
|
Number of patients
|
Mean followup (years)
|
Mean defect length (cm)
|
MSTS score (%)
|
Complication rate (%)
|
MSTS: Musculoskeletal Tumour Society, NR: Normal range
|
Zaretski et al.[[11]]
|
30
|
2.5
|
NR
|
-
|
37
|
Krieg et al.[[12]]
|
16
|
1.0
|
16.2
|
85
|
-
|
Eward WC et al.[[13]]
|
30
|
4.9
|
14.8
|
-
|
53
|
Rabitsch et al.[[14]]
|
12
|
3.2
|
18.7
|
-
|
50
|
Parag et al.[[15]]
|
10
|
3.1
|
18.5
|
86.6
|
50
|
Our study
|
24
|
4.3
|
15.5
|
87
|
23
|
Table 4
Kaplan-Meier survival chart
Case processing summary
|
Total n
|
Number of events
|
|
Censored, n (%)
|
24
|
8
|
|
16 (66.7)
|
Survival Table
|
|
Time
|
Status
|
Cumulative proportion surviving at the time
|
Number of cumulative events
|
Number of remaining cases
|
Estimate
|
SE
|
SE: Standard error
|
1
|
13.996
|
1.00
|
|
|
0
|
23
|
2
|
26.218
|
1.00
|
|
|
0
|
22
|
3
|
35.055
|
2.00
|
|
|
1
|
21
|
4
|
35.055
|
2.00
|
0.909
|
0.061
|
2
|
20
|
5
|
36.468
|
2.00
|
0.864
|
0.073
|
3
|
19
|
6
|
45.700
|
2.00
|
0.818
|
0.082
|
4
|
18
|
7
|
55.195
|
2.00
|
0.773
|
0.089
|
5
|
17
|
8
|
59.893
|
1.00
|
|
|
5
|
16
|
9
|
59.926
|
1.00
|
|
|
5
|
15
|
10
|
61.405
|
1.00
|
|
|
5
|
14
|
11
|
63.770
|
2.00
|
0.718
|
0.099
|
6
|
13
|
12
|
69.947
|
1.00
|
|
|
6
|
12
|
13
|
74.251
|
1.00
|
|
|
6
|
11
|
14
|
90.875
|
1.00
|
|
|
6
|
10
|
15
|
95.211
|
1.00
|
|
|
6
|
9
|
16
|
96.131
|
1.00
|
|
|
6
|
8
|
17
|
100.665
|
1.00
|
|
|
6
|
7
|
18
|
101.027
|
2.00
|
0.615
|
0.127
|
7
|
6
|
19
|
104.936
|
2.00
|
0.513
|
0.141
|
8
|
5
|
20
|
108.977
|
1.00
|
|
|
8
|
4
|
21
|
111.507
|
1.00
|
|
|
8
|
3
|
22
|
111.540
|
1.00
|
|
|
8
|
2
|
23
|
113.117
|
1.00
|
|
|
8
|
1
|
24
|
161.248
|
1.00
|
|
|
8
|
0
|
CONCLUSIONS
Pedicled fibula is a good option if the defect is within 14 cm of the knee joint at
the femoral end. In cases where the tibial condyles are also excised due to oncological
reasons, the reach of pedicled fibula is more as compared to cases in which the tibial
condyles are spared. This helps in planning for a pedicled or free fibula. Furthermore,
the ipsilateral fibular head increases the pedicle length requirement in pedicled
fibula as the vessels have to curve around it, so it is important to remove the fibula
head taking care to preserve the common peroneal nerve. The flap is easy to harvest
with predictable vascular anatomy and it can provide large amount of the vascularised
bone and skin paddle. It results in early ambulation, rehabilitation and reduced morbidity.
In our experience, we realised that fixation is easier and chances of vascular injury
are less in free as compared to the pedicled fibula.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.