Keywords
Gallbladder cancer - positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan - xanthogranulomatous
cholecystitis
Introduction
Based on imaging, it can be difficult to differentiate between xanthogranulomatous
cholecystitis (XGC) and gall bladder carcinoma by ultrasonography (USG), computed
tomography scan, or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed
tomography (PET-CT) scan. The common feature of mural thickening on conventional imaging
and nonspecific FDG uptake on PET/CT scan makes it very difficult to differentiate
between these benign and malignant conditions. Histopathology remains the gold standard
for these conditions. Our case highlights the common imaging characteristics of mural
thickening and few distinct criteria developed on CT to differentiate between them
and pitfall of FDG due to nonspecific uptake in inflammatory cells also apart from
malignant tissue.
Case Report
A 71-year-old female presented with pain abdomen and fever since 3 months. USG was
suggestive of thickened gallbladder wall. Thus, in view of suspicion of malignancy,
the patient was referred for PET-CT scan. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was suggestive of cholelithiasis with intensely FDG avid [Figure 1a], [Figure 1b], [Figure 1c], [Figure 1d], [Figure 1e], [Figure 1f], [Figure 1g] circumferential nodular mural thickening in gall bladder, more in the fundus region,
showing loss of fat planes with the adjacent liver with small hypodense areas within
(arrows). Thus, in view of suspicion of malignancy, cholecystectomy was planned. The
histopathology [Figure 2] showed gallbladder mucosa was completely ulcerated with only few foci of flattened
mucosa. There was very dense chronic and xanthogranulomatous inflammation in wall
suggestive of acute on chronic cholecystitis with xanthogranulomatous inflammation.
Figure 1 Maximum intensity projection (a) of whole body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission
tomography/computed tomography scan. Axial and coronal computed tomography and fused
positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (b-e) Images showing fluorodeoxyglucose
avid nodular mural thickening, more in the neck and fundus of gallbladder abutting
the adjacent hepatic parenchyma. Axial computed tomography arterial and portovenous
phases (f-g) showing asymmetric thickening of gallbladder wall in fundus region, with
hypodense areas within, abutting adjacent liver
Figure 2 Gallbladder with ulcerated surface epithelium. Wall shows dense mixed inflammatory
infiltrate rich in histiocytes (a, H and E × 101). Gallbladder wall shows dense mixed
inflammatory infiltrate rich in histiocytes, diffusely infiltrating into the muscle
(b, H and E × 200)
Discussion
XGC is a rare chronic gallbladder (GB) disease which is characterized by the proliferation
of xanthoma within the GB wall.[1] Macroscopically, it appears like yellowish tumor like mass in the wall of the gall
bladder. It is an infrequent chronic granulomatous inflammation of the gall bladder,
first described by Christensen and Ishak in 1970 as “Fibroxanthogranulomatous inflammation.”[2] The term XGC was coined by McCoy et al. in 1976.[3] Although it is a benign disease, it is often mistaken as GB carcinoma due to the
thickened GB wall. Histologically, the rupture of the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses,
causes an inflammatory reaction, which can infiltrate adjacent organs, forming dense
adhesions. It is a variant of cholecystitis. Extravasation of bile into the GB wall
is supposedly the initiating event in the pathogenesis of XGC, which later triggers
an inflammatory process that might be acute or chronic. The imaging characteristics
reported for XGC are a continuous mucosal line in a thickened GB wall, an intramural
GB wall nodule, and the presence of gallstones on a background of chronic GB disease.[4] Because of the similarity to gall bladder cancer in clinical manifestations and
radiological findings, makes it difficult to distinguish between them.
Few articles have been published describing the similarities and differences between
XGC from gallbladder cancer[5],[6] and few reports about false-positive results on FDG-PET/CT scan.[7] Several studies have shown the strong association between gallstones and XGC,[8] as seen in our case. Ultrasound and CT scan may show nonspecific GB wall thickening.
The presence of diffuse GB wall thickening, continuous mucosal line, intramural hypoattenuated
nodules, absence of macroscopic hepatic invasion, and lack of intrahepatic biliary
dilation on CT scan could help differentiate XGC from GB cancer with sensitivity and
specificity of 83% and 100%, respectively, when three of these five findings are observed.[9] FDG-PET/CT scan is helpful in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions
with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 75% to 78% and 82% to 100%, respectively,
for the detection of GB cancer.[10] However, numerous cases of false-positive results have been seen because inflammatory
cells in XGC also have high rates of glucose metabolism similar to malignant cells.[11] Thus, XGC is a rare, benign, chronic inflammation of the GB that has clinical, radiological,
and intraoperative features similar to that of GB cancer and only histopathology can
definitively differentiate the two conditions.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms.
In the form, the patient has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images
and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands
that their names and initials will not be published, and due efforts will be made
to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed
