Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure - Sleep Initiation
and Maintenance Disorders
INTRODUCTION
Chronic insomnia disorder (CID) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) are two
common sleep disorders which frequently co-occur[1]. Different studies documented that 40-60% of OSAS patients have insomnia symptoms,
far exceeding the percentage present in the general population[2]
,
[3]. Furthermore, 29%-67% of patients with insomnia have an apnoea-hypopnoea index greater
than 5, indicating the presence of at least a mild degree of sleep-disordered breathing[4]. These two diseases influence each other in negative ways leading to greater illness
severity[5]. Some studies reveal that patients with OSAS and comorbid insomnia have more depression,
anxiety and stress-related symptoms, comparing with patients with isolated OSAS[6]. Furthermore, OSAS is an established cardiovascular risk factor[7] and there is increasing evidences for similar adverse effects in CID[8].
Theoretically, the impact OSA treatment in patients with CID may have contradictory
results. On the one hand, the most commonly used treatment for OSA is a continuous
positive airway pressure (CPAP)[9]. Some studies suggest that the co-occurrence of OSAS and insomnia symptoms may complicate
OSAS treatment and reduce CPAP adherence, leading to increased sleep difficulties[10]
,
[11], especially in patient with sleep-onset insomnia[2]. One the other hand, suppressing abnormal respiratory events may reduce frequent
awakenings, which may lead to insomnia improvement.
Despite the aforementioned common co-occurrence of OSAS and CID and its cumulative
impact on patient's health, few studies have analyzed the impact of OSAS treatment
in insomnia symptoms. Earlier studies using small patient groups have suggested that,
in mild OSAS, the combined treatment of insomnia with cognitive-behavioral therapy
and OSAS treatment with different but predominantly surgical modalities was superior
to isolated insomnia treatment[12]
-
[14].
More recent case series showed significant improvement in insomnia symptoms in OSAS
patients when treated with CPAP[2]
,
[15]
-
[17]. However, these studies analyzed mostly patients with severe OSAS diagnosed with
ambulatory cardiorespiratory recordings[12] or patients without comorbidities like anxiety[17]. Furthermore there is evidence to support that man and women have different OSAS
related symptoms[18] and different clinical profiles when OSAS is comorbid with insomnia[19]. None of the previous studies has specifically analyzed differences in insomnia
symptoms response to CPAP treatment in men and women.
We have, therefore, aimed at evaluating the response to CPAP in patients with CID
with OSAS in an unselected patient population including all OSAS severity groups.
As a secondary objective, we also wanted to evaluate the differences between patients
that improve insomnia symptoms with CPAP and patients that do not improve, specifically
evaluating possible gender differences.
METHODS
The study is a retrospective case series. Patients were selected from a database of
an outpatient sleep clinic of University Hospital - Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro
Hospitalar Lisboa Norte. All patients with a diagnosis of OSAS treated with CPAP and
CID at the first clinical visit were included. Patients without clinical follow-up
or with insomnia that developed after CPAP use were excluded. OSAS and CID were diagnosed
clinically by a sleep disorders specialist.
OSAS was considered when there is five or more predominantly obstructive respiratory
events per hour of sleep during PSG plus signs/symptoms (associated sleepiness, fatigue,
insomnia, snoring, subjective nocturnal respiratory disturbance, or observed apnea)
or associated medial or phychiatric disorder (hypertension, coronary artery disease,
atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, stroke, diabetes, cognitive dysfunction
or mood disorder), according to ICSD-3 criteria.
OSAS severity was classified as mild/ moderate when the RDI was between 5-30/h and
severe when the RDI was ≥ 30/h. Hypopneas were classified when there was a > 30% reduction
of nasal flow associated with 3% desaturation or microarousal, according to the most
recent AASM criteria[20]. Questions regarding sleep quality were also evaluated through a structured questionnaire
that is applied to all patient on the first clinical visit. The main outcome was insomnia
improvement after CPAP use, based in clinical impression by a sleep specialist, as
recorded in the patient clinical file, from 1 to 12 months after CPAP start. CPAP
responder was considered when the patients improved insomnia after initiating CPAP.
Given the retrospective nature of the study, the periodicity of the clinical visit
was variable. However, as a general rule in our sleep clinic, patients are evaluated
1 month, 3 months and 12 months after starting CPAP.
Other variables analyzed were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), presence of vascular
risk factors, presence of anxiety/depressive symptoms, use of sedative/hypnotic treatment
before CPAP use, Apnea hypopnea index (AIH), Respiratory distress index (RDI), Epworth
sleepiness scale (ESS), CPAP compliance, sedative/hypnotics after the CPAP use, OSAS
severity and type of insomnia (initial, maintenance, terminal). CPAP compliance was
considered when there was > 75% of use during > 4hours.
Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and comparisons between responders
and non-responders to CPAP made with T test in continuous variables, Qui2 or Fischer
exact test in categorical variables (p < 0.05).
RESULTS
From 827 patients, 95 patients had OSAS and CID in the first clinical evaluation.
Five patients were excluded because they did not have follow up information regarding
insomnia evolution after CPAP use. Therefore 90 patients were evaluated in this study
([Figure 1]). [Table 1] documents the clinical characteristics of the patients, based on questionnaire responses.
Figure 1 Flow chart of the participants.
Table 1
The clinical characteristics of the patients, based on questionnaire responses.
|
All (n=90)
|
Do you have problems in fall asleep?
|
Yes 59.0%
|
Do you awake up during night?
|
Yes 98.8%
|
How many times do you wake up during night?
|
3.35±1.457
|
How long do you stay awake?
|
3.99±2.471
|
Have you been sleepy?
|
Yes 54.2%
|
Have you been tiredness?
|
Yes 75%
|
Do you have sleep or tired problems in your work?
|
Yes 48.2%
|
How often do sleep problems arise?
|
Continuously 52.2 %, Sporadically 6.7%; Often 36.7%; Periodically 4.4%
|
The baseline characteristics are presented in [Table 2]. From the 90 patients with OSAS and insomnia, 53.3% were females. The mean age was
62.1±11.64 years. Most patients were obese (mean BMI 28.68±4.9 kg/m[2]). Before starting CPAP, 55.6% of patients were on sedative/hypnotic drugs and 36.1%
had anxiety/depressive symptoms. Around two thirds (68,9%) had mild/moderate sleep
apnea (mean AHI 23.75±18.99; RDI 24.95±13.9). Most patients were not sleepy (mean
ESS 8.80±5.26).
Table 2
Baseline characteristics.
|
All (n=90)
|
Sex
|
Female 53.3%
|
Age
|
Mean 62.06±11.64; Median 64.00
|
BMI
|
Mean 28.68±4.88; Median 27.74
|
Vascular risk factors
|
Yes 57.8%
|
Anxiety/ depressive symptoms (n=83)
|
Yes 36.1%
|
Use of the sedative therapeutic before the CPAP use
|
Yes 55.6%
|
AHI
|
Mean 23.75±18.99; Median 17.0
|
RDI
|
Mean 24.95±13.93; Median 21.0
|
ESS
|
Mean 8.80±5.26; Median 8.00
|
CPAP compliance
|
Yes 78.9%
|
Sedative therapeutic after CPAP beginning (n=85)
|
Yes 35.3%
|
BMI- body mass index, AHI- apnea hypopnea index; RDI- respiratory disturb index; ESS-
Epworth sleepiness scale;
Age, BMI, AHI, RDI, ESS: mean ±SD.
The [Figure 2] shows the baseline prevalence of insomnia symptoms among all patients. The most
common insomnia subtype was intermediate insomnia, but initial and terminal insomnia
were also present. It is important reinforce that there were also patients with concomitant
initial and middle insomnia (22.2%), middle and late insomnia (4.4%), initial and
late insomnia (1.1%) and also patients that complained of the three insomnia subtypes
(3.3%) ([Figure 2]).
Figure 2 Baseline prevalence of insomnia symptoms among all patients.
Most patients (78.9%) were compliant with CPAP. One third of the patients (35.3%)
had to start hypnotic/sedative treatment after CPAP. Most of this treatment was introduced
to increase CPAP compliance (67.9%) or depressive/anxiety symptoms (21.5%). Only 10.7%
of the patients started pharmacological treatment specifically to decrease insomnia
symptoms. This treatment was transient in 20% of these patients, having been discontinued
at 12 months follow-up.
Insomnia symptoms improved in 61.1% for the patients after CPAP use. This was noted,
on average, 5.35±4 months after CPAP use. From these patients, 58.2% had initial insomnia,
63.6% middle insomnia and 12.7% late insomnia.
[Table 3] describes the differences between responders and non-responders to CPAP. Responders
were more frequently women (p value=0.035). We did not find any other difference between these two groups. Improvement
after CPAP was similar in men and women with mild/moderate OSA. However, men with
severe OSA were less likely to improve insomnia symptoms (31.6%) that women (88.9%)
after CPAP ([Table 4]).
Table 3
Baseline characteristics difference between the responders and non-responders to CPAP.
|
n=90
|
|
Responders (n = 55)
|
Non- responders (n=35)
|
p value
|
Age
|
62.78±10.70
|
60.91±13.07
|
0.461
|
Sex
|
Fem 61.8%; Male 38.2%
|
Fem 40%; Male 60%
|
0.035
|
BMI
|
28.85±4.68
|
28.45±5.20
|
0.724
|
Vascular risk factors
|
Yes 40.0%
|
Yes 54.3%
|
0.593
|
Anxiety/ depressive symptoms
|
Yes 38.5%
|
Yes 32.3%
|
0.569
|
AHI
|
22.02±16.78
|
26.48±22.00
|
0.280
|
RDI
|
22.61±12.15
|
26.17±16.51
|
0.349
|
OSAS type
|
Mid/Mod 74.6%; Severe 25.4%
|
Mid/Mod 60.0% Severe 40.0%
|
0.167
|
Initial insomnia
|
Yes 58.2%
|
Yes 48.6%
|
0.394
|
Middle insomnia
|
Yes 63.6%
|
Yes 71.4%
|
0.298
|
Late insomnia
|
Yes 12.7%
|
Yes 20.0%
|
0.262
|
CPAP compliance
|
Yes 76.4%
|
Yes 82.9%
|
0.611
|
Sedative therapeutic after CPAP
|
Yes 34.0%
|
Yes 31.1%
|
0.471
|
Table 4
Difference by sex in insomnia improvement after the CPAP use, according the OSAS type.
Middle/moderate OSAS
|
Insomnia improvement
|
p = 0.561
|
Yes
|
No
|
Sex
|
Women
|
n=26, 66.7%
|
n=13, 33.3%
|
Men
|
n=15, 65.2%
|
n=8, 34.8%
|
Severe OSAS
|
Insomnia improvement
|
p = 0.013*
|
Yes
|
No
|
Sex
|
Women
|
n=8, 88.9%
|
n=1, 11.1%
|
Men
|
n=6, 31.6%
|
n=13, 68.4%
|
In Supplementary material, the baseline characteristics of men and women from our
sample are described. The only significant difference was a higher percentage of women
with anxiety/depression (see in Supplementary material, [Table 1]).
DISCUSSION
The population of this study was evaluated retrospectively, considering a target population
with OSAS and insomnia which started CPAP. We analyzed the occurrence of insomnia
improvement in the first 12 months after beginning CPAP. Our results suggest that
CPAP has a positive effect in insomnia improvement. From the 90 patients, 61.1% improved
insomnia with CPAP use. This percentage of response is similar to other studies[2]
,
[15]
-
[17]. Our data shows that even insomniac patients with mild/moderate sleep apnea may
respond to CPAP treatment and this response is independent on the presence of previous
psychiatric disorders.
In our study, insomnia subtypes were not associated with different treatments responses.
Our sample included few patients with isolated terminal insomnia, rendering this patient
group less amenable to conclusions. However, we had one third of patients with isolated
sleep-onset insomnia. In this group, 58% showed improvement after CPAP, a percentage
similar to patients with sleep-maintenance insomnia (68%). The study by Björnsdóttir
et al.[2] has suggested that only patients with sleep-maintenance insomnia improve after CPAP.
In their study, patients with initial insomnia were uncommon (only 3% of the entire
insomniac patients) probably due to the way patients were selected, from a cohort
of OSAS patients.
We included in our sample all patients referred to the sleep clinic, regardless of
the reason of referral, as long as on the first clinical interview CID was diagnosed
and OSAS was diagnosed on a PSG. They suggest that middle insomnia improves after
CPAP because there are less OSAS related awakenings. However, there is another mechanism
by which OSAS treatment may lead to insomnia improvement. Reducing symptoms of un-refreshed
sleep with CPAP treatment in OSAS reduces the negative impact of bad sleep on daytime
functioning and may lead to less sleep-related effort. This mechanism is of foremost
importance in all cognitive-behavioral programs for insomnia[21].
The most striking finding in our study is related to the gender differences in insomnia
response to CPAP treatment. In our cohort, women with insomnia and OSAS were more
likely to improve their insomnia symptoms after CPAP, particularly so in the severe
OSAS group. There are few studies that have specifically looked from different treatment
responses in men and women with OSA. It is noteworthy that the only difference between
men and women was higher frequency of depressive symptoms in women. Factors that might
be related to this different response, like OSAS severity, CPAP compliance and insomnia
subtypes were similar in both groups.
There are very few studies that evaluate sex differences comorbid OSAS and insomnia.
One study showed that gender differences in these two pathologies could be partially
explained by different sleep architectures between men and women. Men with OSAS-insomnia
had decreased sleep efficiency and increased sleep latency comparing to men with OSAS-alone.
In contrast, PSG based sleep architecture was not different between women with OSAS-insomnia
and OSA alone[22].
Insomnia is a much more common manifestation of OSAS in women than in men[23]. It is possible to hypothesize that for men with OSAS to develop insomnia, the relative
importance of other insomnia related-factors, namely genetic, environmental, behavioral
or physiological[19] has to be bigger than in women. This group of patients may require more specific
insomnia related interventions.
It is important to acknowledge that 38.9% of the patients did not improve insomnia
with CPAP therapy despite having a good CPAP compliance. Insomnia is a multifactorial
disorder and there are other mechanisms related to insomnia which do not depend from
respiratory sleep disturbance. Recent reports have shown that insomnia patients may
be divided in different phenotypes, related mostly to personality, mood and well-being
and psychological reactions to insomnia or life events[24].
The response to CPAP therapy may different in this various insomnia phenotypes but
further studies specifically designed to evaluate different insomnia subtypes are
necessary to confirm this hypothesis. As previously analyzed in small clinical trials
and case series[4]
,
[13] the best treatment approach to patients with comorbid CID and OSAS is combined OSA
treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy. These small studies suggest that this
combined approach is better than each isolated treatment per se.
Another important clinical finding from our study is the high percentage of compliance
to CPAP in patients with OSAS and insomnia. Despite initial studies that suggested
that this group of patients might have difficulties with CPAP therapy[25] other authors have also shown that CPAP compliance is not influenced by comorbid
insomnia, with CPAP use per night ranges from 6.2 to 3.4 hours[26]
,
[27].
We acknowledge that this study has important limitations. First, it is a retrospective
study, carried out on patients followed on usual clinical practice. None of the patients
entered a specific cognitive -behavioral therapy program for insomnia (CBTi). However,
the clinicians following all patients had expertise in sleep medicine and techniques
of CBTi, which were most likely used in each clinical visit. The effect of this cannot
be evaluated in our study design[28]. Secondly, one third of the patients started sedative therapy after the onset of
CPAP, which may have contributed to the final result. This variable had not been previously
evaluated[2]
,
[15]
-
[17].
Nonetheless, all these patients had chronic insomnia and were previously refractory
to these treatments (55.6% did sedative therapeutic before the PAP use) and the percentage
of sedative treatment initiation was not different between responders and non-responders.
Furthermore, 60.0% of the patients that did not change treatment also showed improvement.
It is also noteworthy that CPAP compliance information was evaluated based on clinical
impression and no quantitative adherence values were included in our analysis. However,
this clinical impression is always based on automated CPAP reports.
Lastly, insomnia improvement after the CPAP use was evaluated through clinical impression.
Validated insomnia questionnaires are not used routinely in our sleep clinic, so this
data was not available. It was not possible also to establish which insomnia symptoms,
in patients with concomitant initial, middle or terminal insomnia improved mostly.
Nonetheless, we consider that the information derived from the clinician opinion is
a good reflection of the usual clinical practice.
To summarize, our results show that in most patients with CID and OSA, there is a
consistent reduction of insomnia symptoms with the CPAP use. This factor emphasizes
the importance of performing PSG in CID, as recently suggested in European guidelines
for insomnia management[29]. Insomnia in men with severe OSAS responds less frequently to CPAP suggesting that
in these cases the insomnia phenotype is less dependent on the respiratory symptoms.
Further studies are needed to understand and confirm this finding and define the best
treatment approach to this subgroup of patients.