Download PDF
Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date 2020; 15(01): 23-40
DOI: 10.1055/a-0625-1861
Schultergürtel und obere Extremität
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Anatomische Prothesen bei primärer Omarthrose

Maria Mütze
,
Jan Theopold
,
Pierre Hepp
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 January 2020 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Corrected by:

Erratum: Anatomische Prothesen bei primärer OmarthroseOrthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date 2020; 15(03): 298-298
DOI: 10.1055/a-1160-0158

Dieser Beitrag soll zum Verständnis der primären Omarthrose mit Abgrenzung zur sekundären Ätiologie führen und die diagnostischen Schritte erläutern. Des Weiteren erfolgt die detaillierte Beschreibung von Prothesentypen, Operationsindikationen und der chirurgischen Technik.
Kernaussagen

  • Die primäre Omarthrose stellt die häufigste Indikation zur anatomischen Schulterendoprothese dar.

  • Die Nachbildung des anatomisch individuellen Humeruskopfumfangs und der Kopfhöhe ist für das operative Ergebnis entscheidend.

  • Der deltoideopektorale Zugang gilt als Standardzugang.

  • Unter Bewahrung der größtmöglichen Knochensubstanz ist die schaftfreie Prothese eine gute Option.

  • Die Zementierung des Glenoids stellt den Goldstandard dar.

  • Hohe Versagens- und Revisionsraten sind bei B2-Glenoiden zu erwarten. Kraniale Lockerung des Implantats, Glenoidabrieb, Subscapularisinsuffizienz, sekundäres Rotatorenmanschettenversagen sind häufige Komplikationen.

Schlüsselwörter

Omarthrose - anatomische Schulterprothese - Schaftprothese - Zementierung
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Juel NG, Natvig B. Shoulder diagnoses in secondary care, a one year cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Denard PJ, Walch G. Current concepts in the surgical management of primary glenohumeral arthritis with a biconcave glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 1589-1598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bercik MJ, Kruse K, Yalizis M. et al. A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 1601-1606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lemieux PO, Tétreault P, Hagemeister N. et al. Influence of prosthetic humeral head size and medial offset on the mechanics of the shoulder with cuff tear arthropathy: a numerical study. J Biomech 2013; 46: 806-812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kadum B, Wahlström P, Khoschnau S. et al. Association of lateral humeral offset with functional outcome and geometric restoration in stemless total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: e285-e294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P. Schulterchirurgie. München, Jena: Urban & Fischer; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Radnay CS, Setter KJ, Chambers L. et al. Total shoulder replacement compared with humeral head replacement for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 396-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bartelt R, Sperling JW, Schleck CD. et al. Shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty-five years or younger with osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 123-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Carroll RM, Izquierdo R, Vazquez M. et al. Conversion of painful hemiarthroplasty to total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 599-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revision total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenoid arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 860-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Somerson JS, Matsen FA. Functional outcomes of the ream-and-run shoulder arthroplasty: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 1999-2003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Somerson JS, Neradilek MB, Service BC. et al. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Ream-and-Run Procedure for Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 1291-1304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Tauber M. et al. Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 1463-1472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Churchill RS. et al. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Simpliciti Canal-sparing Shoulder Arthroplasty System: A Prospective Two-year Multicenter Study. J Bone Jt Surg 2016; 98: 552-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B. et al. Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: Radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three yearsʼ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 847-852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hawi N, Tauber M, Messina MJ. et al. Anatomic stemless shoulder arthroplasty and related outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fox TJ, Cil A, Sperling JW. et al. Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 859-863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Walch G, Young AA, Melis B. et al. Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 385-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Boileau P, Moineau G, Morin-Salvo N. et al. Metal-backed glenoid implant with polyethylene insert is not a viable long-term therapeutic option. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 1534-1543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Noyes MP, Meccia B, Spencer EE. Five- to ten-year follow-up with a partially cemented all-polyethylene bone-ingrowth glenoid component. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 1458-1462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shields E, Ho A, Wiater JM. Management of the subscapularis tendon during total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 723-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Choate WS, Kwapisz A, Momaya AM. et al. Outcomes for subscapularis management techniques in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: 363-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lafosse L, Schnaser E, Haag M. et al. Primary total shoulder arthroplasty performed entirely thru the rotator interval: technique and minimum two-year outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 864-873
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Suter T, Kolz CW, Tashjian RZ. et al. Humeral head osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between anterosuperior and inferoanterior resection techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 343-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kasten P, Zwingenberger S, Nowotny J. et al. Maier. Goldstandard zementiertes Glenoid – Technik und Ergebnisse. Obere Extrem 2015; 10: 73-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Terrier A, Büchler P, Farron A. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 2005; 20: 710-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Walch G, Young AA, Boileau P. et al. Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 145-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jun BJ, Lee TQ, McGarry MH. et al. The effects of prosthetic humeral head shape on glenohumeral joint kinematics during humeral axial rotation in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 1084-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Denard PJ, Lädermann A. Immediate versus delayed passive range of motion following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 1918-1924
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar