Aktuelle Urol 2018; 49(04): 328-333
DOI: 10.1055/a-0649-0702
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die medikamentöse Therapie des BPS

Pharmacological treatment of BPS
Thilo Westhofen
1   Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik der Universität München, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
Giuseppe Magistro
1   Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik der Universität München, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
Christian Stief
2   Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Großhadern/Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München
,
Christian Gratzke
2   Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Großhadern/Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 August 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die medikamentöse Therapie des BPS ist oftmals das erstes Therapieregime bei symptomatischen BPS-Patienten, die unter zuwartendem Verhalten signifikant beschwerdeprogredient werden. Ziel der medikamentösen Therapie ist eine schnelle Verbesserung der „lower urinary tract symptoms“ (LUTS), die Verbesserung des Harnstrahls sowie die Verminderung der Restharnmenge. Unerwünschte Nebenwirkungen sollten möglichst niedrig sein.

Die häufig primär eingesetzten α1-Adrenorezeptorblocker überzeugen bei guter Verträglichkeit durch schnelle Wirksamkeit und signifikante Verbesserung von LUTS, Qmax und Restharnmengen.

Bei LUTS auf Grund von größeren Prostatavolumina zeigen 5α-Reduktase-Hemmer nach längerer Einnahme signifikante Verbesserung hinsichtlich Qmax, LUTS und Restharn. Zudem wirken sie als einziges Medikament relevant der Krankheitsprogression entgegen.

Bei ausgeprägten irritativen Beschwerden zeigen umfangreiche Studien gute Ergebnisse unter Therapie mit Muskarinrezeptorantagonisten und den seit kurzem zur BPS-Therapie erneut in Deutschland erhältlichen Beta-3-Agonisten. Beide bewirken Verbesserung der LUTS, ein günstigeres Nebenwirkungsprofil zeigt sich unter Therapie mit Beta-3-Agonisten.

Vorrangig als Therapie erektiler Dysfunktion (ED) genutzte PDE-5-Hemmer zeigen ebenfalls eine signifikante Verbesserung von LUTS und Restharnmengen und eignen sich gut für Patienten mit LUTS in Kombination mit ED.

Die zunehmend äußerst beliebten Phytopharmaka bestechen durch geringe Nebenwirkungen, werden jedoch auf Grund fraglicher Wirksamkeit durch keine akute Leitlinie empfohlen.

Neue Substanzgruppen, aber auch neue Therapieansätze mit bewährten Substanzen ergänzen laufend das wachsende Spektrum der medikamentösen Therapie des BPS. So ermöglichen neue Therapie-Algorithmen die individuelle Anpassung der Therapie an das Risikoprofil des Patienten unter Berücksichtigung unerwünschter Nebenwirkungen.

Abstract

Pharmacological treatment of BPS is often considered the first therapeutic approach for patients who experience progression in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

α1-adrenoceptor antagonists are often chosen as the first line pharmacological treatment, due to their rapid onset of action, as well as their significant impact on LUTS and Qmax and post-void residual. Adverse effects appear to be low.

With larger prostate volume and LUTS, long term treatment with 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) significantly improves LUTS and post-void residual. In addition, 5ARIs have a significant impact on the reduction in disease progression.

Patients with LUTS who mainly suffer from bladder storage symptoms appear to respond to treatment with muscarinic receptor antagonists and beta-3 agonists. Both of these drug classes significantly improve LUTS, but beta-3 agonists seem to be superior with respect to adverse effects.

Treatment with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, which are well established in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) gives significant improvement in LUTS and post-void residual and can therefore be recommended for patients with LUTS and ED.

Phytotherapies have low rates of adverse effects, which has made them increasingly popular, but effects on LUTS, Qmax and post-void residual remain to be proven.

New substances and therapeutic approaches are continuously expanding the options for pharmacological treatment of BPS. As regards adverse effects, therapeutic schemes can increasingly be customised to a patient profile.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Höfner K, Bach T, Berges R. et al. S2e Leitlinie Therapie des Benignen Prostatasyndroms (BPS). 2014
  • 2 Berges RR. et al. Male lower urinary tract symptoms and related health care seeking in Germany. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 682-687
  • 3 Chapple CR. et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms revisited: a broader clinical perspective. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 563-569
  • 4 Berges R. et al. [Diagnostic and differential diagnosis of benign prostate syndrome (BPS): guidelines of the German Urologists]. Urologe A 2009; 48: 1356-1360 , 1362-1364.
  • 5 Cornu JN. et al. A widespread population study of actual medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia across Europe and beyond official clinical guidelines. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 450-456
  • 6 Michel MC, Vrydag W. Alpha1-, alpha2- and beta-adrenoceptors in the urinary bladder, urethra and prostate. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 147 (Suppl. 02) S88-119
  • 7 Keast JR, Kawatani M, De Groat WC. Sympathetic modulation of cholinergic transmission in cat vesical ganglia is mediated by alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors. Am J Physiol 1990; 258: R44-50
  • 8 Djavan B. et al. State of the art on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2004; 64: 1081-1088
  • 9 Roehrborn CG. et al. The effects of combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin on clinical outcomes in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 4-year results from the CombAT study. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 123-131
  • 10 van Dijk MM. et al. Effects of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists on male sexual function. Drugs 2006; 66: 287-301
  • 11 Nickel JC, Sander S, Moon TD. A meta-analysis of the vascular-related safety profile and efficacy of alpha-adrenergic blockers for symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 1547-1559
  • 12 Chatziralli IP, Sergentanis TN. Risk factors for intraoperative floppy iris syndrome: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 730-735
  • 13 Andriole G. et al. Dihydrotestosterone and the prostate: the scientific rationale for 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Journal of Urology 2004; 172: 1399-1403
  • 14 Nickel JC. et al. Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). BJU Int 2011; 108: 388-394
  • 15 Gravas S, Bach T, Bachmann A. et al. EAU Guidelines on Management of Non-Neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO). European Urology. 2016
  • 16 Andersen JT. et al. Finasteride significantly reduces acute urinary retention and need for surgery in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1997; 49: 839-845
  • 17 Andriole GL. et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1192-1202
  • 18 Chess-Williams R. et al. The minor population of M3-receptors mediate contraction of human detrusor muscle in vitro. J Auton Pharmacol 2001; 21: 243-248
  • 19 Yokoyama T. et al. Naftopidil and propiverine hydrochloride for treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia and concomitant overactive bladder: a prospective randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009; 43: 307-314
  • 20 Abrams P. et al. Safety and tolerability of tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder in men with bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol 2006; 175: 999-1004 discussion 1004
  • 21 Kaplan SA. et al. Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2319-2328
  • 22 Chapple CR. et al. Randomized double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 study to assess 12-month safety and efficacy of mirabegron, a beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist, in overactive bladder. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 296-305
  • 23 Nitti VW. et al. Urodynamics and safety of the beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron in males with lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol 2013; 190: 1320-1327
  • 24 Giuliano F. et al. The mechanism of action of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 506-516
  • 25 Oelke M. et al. Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 917-925
  • 26 Morelli A. et al. Phosphodiesterase type 5 expression in human and rat lower urinary tract tissues and the effect of tadalafil on prostate gland oxygenation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 2746-2760
  • 27 Minagawa T. et al. Inhibitory effects of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, on mechanosensitive bladder afferent nerve activities of the rat, and on acrolein-induced hyperactivity of these nerves. BJU Int 2012; 110: E259-266
  • 28 Sperling H. et al. New treatment options for erectile dysfunction. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic options. Herz 2003; 28: 314-324