Klinische Neurophysiologie 2019; 50(03): 137-140
DOI: 10.1055/a-0942-8301
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Alte Methoden: Der heutige Stellenwert der Elektroenzephalografie (EEG)

Old Methods: The Role of Electroencephalography (EEG)
Soheyl Noachtar
1   Neurologische Klinik & Poliklinik, Epilepsie-Zentrum, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
,
Christoph Baumgartner
2   Neurologischen Abteilung, Krankenhaus Hietzing mit Neurologischem Zentrum Rosenhügel, Karl Landsteiner Institut für Klinische Epilepsieforschung und Kognitive Neurologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität, Wien
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 August 2019 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Nach Jahrzehnten Erfahrung des klinischen Einsatzes sind die diagnostischen Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des EEGs inzwischen gut einschätzbar. Der klinische Einsatz erfolgt vor allem bei Epilepsien, Encephalopathien und Parasomnien. Die Übergänge zwischen physiologischen Varianten-Mustern und pathologischen EEG Mustern sind altersabhängig und teilweise unscharf. Umso wichtiger ist eine klar strukturierte und systematische EEG-Auswertung, um Über- und Fehlinterpretationen zu vermeiden. Diese Übersicht beleuchtet den heutigen Einsatz der EEG.

Abstract

Decades of clinical experience enable assessment of the diagnostic yield of EEG and its limitations. EEG is a useful tool in the diagnostic evaluations of epilepsy, encephalopathy and parasomnias. Differentiation between physiological variants and abnormal EEG patterns depends on age, and the borders between the 2 are sometimes blurred. A clear and systematic approach to EEG reading is all the more important to avoid over-reading and misinterpretation. This review addresses the current use of EEG.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Berger H. Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. Arch Psychiatrie 1929; 87: 527-570
  • 2 Miller JW, Henry JC. Solving the dilemma of EEG misinterpretation. Neurology 2013; 80: 13-14
  • 3 Tatum OW. Artifact-related Epilepsy. Neurology 2013; 80: S12-S25
  • 4 Noachtar S, Rémi J. Elektroenzephalographie – Lehrbuch und Atlas. Kohlhammer; Stuttgart: 2018
  • 5 Noachtar S, Rémi J. Systematischer Zugang zur EEG-Befundung bei Epilepsie. Z Epileptol 2011; 24: 247-260
  • 6 Loesch AM. Was tun im Anfall? Testung und Schützen des Patienten im Anfall. Das Neurophysiologie-Labor 2015; 158-162
  • 7 Van Donselaar CA, Schimsheimer RJ, Geerts AT. et al. Value of the electroencephalogram in adult patients with untreated idiopathic first seizures. Arch Neurol 1992; 49: 231-237
  • 8 Baldin E, Hauser WA, Buchhalter JR. et al. Yield of epileptiform electroencephalogram abnormalities in incident unprovoked seizures: A population-based study. Epilepsia 2014; 55: 1389-1398
  • 9 Desai B, Whitman S, Bouffard DA. The role of the EEG in epilepsy of long duration. Epilepsia 1988; 29: 601-606
  • 10 Selvitelli MF, Walker LM, Schomer DL. et al. The relationship of interictal epileptiform discharges to clinical epilepsy severity: a study of routine electroencephalograms and review of the literature. J Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 27: 87-92
  • 11 Sundaram M, Hogan T, Hiscock M. et al. Factors affecting interictal spike discharges in adults with epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 75: 358-360
  • 12 Salinsky M, Kanter R, Dasheiff RM. Effectiveness of multiple EEGs in supporting the diagnosis of epilepsy: an operational curve. Epilepsia 1987; 28: 331-334
  • 13 Fountain NB, Kim JS, Lee SI. Sleep deprivation activates epileptiform discharges independent of the activating effects of sleep. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 15: 69-75
  • 14 Werhahn KJ, Hartl E, Hamann K. et al. Latency of interictal epileptiform discharges in long-term EEG recordings in epilepsy patients. Seizure 2015; 29: 20-25
  • 15 Krendl R, Lurger S, Baumgartner C. Absolute spike frequency predicts surgical outcome in TLE with unilateral hippocampal atrophy. Neurology 2008; 71: 413-418
  • 16 Noachtar S, Peters AS. Semiology of epileptic seizures: a critical review. Epilepsy & Behavior 2009; 15: 2-9
  • 17 Noachtar S, Borggraefe I. Epilepsy surgery: a critical review. Epilepsy & Behavior 2009; 15: 66-72
  • 18 Noachtar S. Differentialdiagnose epileptischer Anfälle: Was ist Epielpsie und was nicht?. Nervenarzt 2017; 88: 1107-1108
  • 19 Vollmar C, Feddersen B, Beckmann BM. et al. Seizures on hearing the alarm clock. Lancet 2007; 370: 2172
  • 20 Thorsteinsdottir J, Vollmar C, Tonn JC. et al Outcome after individualized stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation and navigated resection in patients with lesional and non-lesional focal epilepsy. J Neurol 2019; 266: 910-920
  • 21 Baumgartner C, Koren JP. Seizure detection using scalp-EEG. Epilepsia 2018; 59 Suppl 1 14-22
  • 22 Vollmar C, Noachtar S, Winkler P. Multimodal image processing in pre-surgical planning. In Lüders HO. (eds). Epilepsy surgery. Informa Healthcare; London: 2008: 771-777
  • 23 Schaul N. Pathogenesis and significance of abnormal nonepileptiform rhythms in the EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 7: 229-248
  • 24 Benbadis SR, Lin K. Errors in EEG interpretation and misdiagnosis of epilepsy: which EEG patterns are overread?. Eur Neurol 2008; 59: 267-271
  • 25 Benbadis SR, Tatum WO. Over-interpretation of EEGs and misdiagnosis of epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 20: 42-44
  • 26 Kaplan PW, Sutter R. Affair with triphasic waves – their striking presence, mysterious significance, and cryptic origins: What are they?. J Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 32: 401-405
  • 27 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN) https://www.dgn.org/leitlinien/3176-leitlinie-diagnose-und-therapie-von-demenzen-2016
  • 28 Höller Y, Bathke AC, Uhl A. et al. Combining SPECT and Quantitative EEG Analysis for the Automated Differential Diagnosis of Disorders with Amnestic Symptoms. Front Aging Neurosci 2017; 9 Article 290
  • 29 Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG. et al. Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Neurology 2004; 62: 1743-1748
  • 30 Boulanger JM, Deacon C, Lecuyer D. et al. Triphasic waves versus nonconvulsive status epilepticus: EEG distinction. Can J Neurol Sci 2006; 33: 175-180
  • 31 DeLorenzo RJ, Waterhouse EJ, Towne AR. et al. Persistent nonconvulsive status epilepticus after the control of convulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia 1998; 39: 833-840
  • 32 Jaitly R, Sgro JA, Towne AR. et al. Prognostic value of EEG monitoring after status epilepticus: a prospective adult study. J Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 14: 326-334
  • 33 Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG. et al. Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology 2000; 54: 340-345
  • 34 Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP. et al. Consensus Statement on Continuous EEG in Critically Ill Adults and Children, Part I: Indications. J Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 32: 87-95
  • 35 Stefani A, Högl B. Diagnostic Criteria, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment of Minor Motor Activity and Less Well-Known Movement Disorders of Sleep. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2019; 21: 1
  • 36 Noachtar S, Rémi J. The role of EEG in epilepsy: A critical review. Epilepsy & Behavior 2009; 15: 22-33
  • 37 Noachtar S. Elektroenzephalographie: Systematische Beschreibung, Klassifikation und Beurteilung. In Bischoff C, Straube A. (Hrsg.) Leitlinien Klinische Neurophysiologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2014: 165-169
  • 38 Williams GW, Luders HO, Brickner A. et al. Interobserver variability in EEG interpretation. Neurology 1985; 35: 1714-1719
  • 39 Krauss GL, Abdallah A, Lesser R. et al. Clinical and EEG features of patients with EEG wicket rhythms misdiagnosed with epilepsy. Neurology 2005; 4: 1879
  • 40 Benbadis S. “Just like EKGs!” Should EEGs undergo a confirmatory interpretation by a clinical neurophysiologist?. Neurology 2013; 80: S47-S51