Download PDF
Radiopraxis 2019; 12(04): E93-E106
DOI: 10.1055/a-0981-9390
CPD-Fortbildung

Deep Learning in der SPECT und PET des Gehirns

Deep Learning in SPECT and PET of the brain
Ralph Buchert∗
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
,
Julia Krüger
2   jung diagnostics, Hamburg
,
Nils Gessert
3   Institut für Medizintechnische Systeme, Technische Universität Hamburg, Hamburg
,
Wencke Lehnert
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
,
Ivayla Apostolova
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
,
Susanne Klutmann
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
,
Alexander Schlaefer
3   Institut für Medizintechnische Systeme, Technische Universität Hamburg, Hamburg
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Deep Learning hat in den letzten Jahren in vielen Bereichen spektakuläre Erfolge erzielt, nicht zuletzt in der medizinischen Bildverarbeitung. Nach einer kurzen Einführung in die grundlegenden Ideen von Deep Learning sollen in diesem Übersichtsartikel einige ausgewählte Anwendungen in der SPECT und PET des Gehirns vorgestellt werden.

Deep Learning - faltende neuronale Netze - CNN - SPECT - PET - Parkinson - Alzheimer


Publication History

Article published online:
09 December 2019

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Prashanth R, Roy SD, Mandal PK. et al. Automatic classification and prediction models for early Parkinsonʼs disease diagnosis from SPECT imaging. Expert Systems with Applications 2014; 41: 3333-3342
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Zubal IG, Early M, Yuan O. et al. Optimized, automated striatal uptake analysis applied to SPECT brain scans of Parkinson’s disease patients. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2007; 48: 857-864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kupitz D, Apostolova I, Lange C. et al. Global scaling for semi-quantitative analysis in FP-CIT SPECT. Nuklearmedizin 2014; 53: 234-241
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2013; 35: 1798-1828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tagare HD, DeLorenzo C, Chelikani S. et al. Voxel-based logistic analysis of PPMI control and Parkinson’s disease DaTscans. Neuroimage 2017; 152: 299-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Oliveira FPM, Castelo-Branco M. Computer-aided diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease based on [123I]FP-CIT SPECT binding potential images, using the voxels-as-features approach and support vector machines. Journal of Neural Engineering 2015; 12: 026008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bengio Y, Delalleau O. On the Expressive Power of Deep Architectures. Algorithmic Learning Theory 2011; 6925: 18-36
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Bengio Y. Learning Deep Architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 2009; 1-127
    Google Scholar
  • 9 He K, Zhang X, Ren S. et al. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv 2015; 1512: 03385
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Eklund A, Dufort P, Forsberg D. et al. Medical image processing on the GPU – Past, present and future. Medical Image Analysis 2013; 17: 1073-1094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015; 521: 436-444
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Choi H. Deep Learning in Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2018; 52: 109-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2012; 25 : DOI: 10.1145/3065386
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H. et al. ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Journal of Computer Vision 2014; 115: 1-42
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y. et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the Ieee 1998; 86: 2278-2324
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the Future – Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 2016; 375: 1216-1219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lee CH, Yoon HJ. Medical big data: promise and challenges. Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2017; 36: 3-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mueller SG, Weiner MW, Thal LJ. et al. Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Alzheimers Dement 2005; 1: 55-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jagust WJ, Landau SM, Koeppe RA. et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 PET Core: 2015. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11: 757-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative. The Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI). Prog Neurobiol. 2011 95. 629-635
  • 22 Marek K, Chowdhury S, Siderowf A. et al. Parkinson’s Progression Markers I. The Parkinson’s progression markers initiative (PPMI) – establishing a PD biomarker cohort. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018; 5: 1460-1477
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Martinez-Murcia FJ, Gorriz JM, Ramirez J. et al. Functional Brain Imaging Synthesis Based on Image Decomposition and Kernel Modeling: Application to Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Neuroinform 2017; 11: 65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kim DH, Wit H, Thurston M. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease from ioflupane-123 singlephoton emission computed tomography dopamine transporter scans using transfer learning. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 39: 887-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Warren E. Strengthening Research through Data Sharing. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 401-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE. et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 2017; 42: 60-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Moeskops P, de Bresser J, Kuijf HJ. et al. Evaluation of a deep learning approach for the segmentation of brain tissues and white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin in MRI. Neuroimage-Clinical 2018; 17: 251-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Erlandsson K, Buvat I, Pretorius PH. et al. A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2012; 57: R119-R159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Lange C, Teipel S. et al. Neuroimaging AsD. PETPVE12: an SPM toolbox for Partial Volume Effects correction in brain PET Application to amyloid imaging with AV45-PET. Neuroimage 2017; 147: 669-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Thyreau B, Sato K, Fukuda H. et al. Segmentation of the hippocampus by transferring algorithmic knowledge for large cohort processing. Medical Image Analysis 2018; 43: 214-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Choi H, Jin KH. Fast and robust segmentation of the striatum using deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2016; 274: 146-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cheng X, Zhang L, Zheng YF. Deep similarity learning for multimodal medical images. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering-Imaging and Visualization 2018; 6: 248-252
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Li RJ, Zhang WL, Suk HI. et al. Deep Learning Based Imaging Data Completion for Improved Brain Disease Diagnosis. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -Miccai 2014; 17: 305-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadiey J, Mirza M. et al. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems Montreal. , Canada: 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Nie D, Trullo R, Petitjean C. et al. Medical image synthesis with context-aware generative adversarial networks. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer;: 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Karpathy A, Li FF. Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptions. Ieee Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2017; 39: 664-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Shin HC, Roberts K, Lu L. et al. Learning to read chest x-rays: Recurrent neural cascade model for automated image annotation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Wang X, Peng Y, Lu L. et al. Tienet: Text-image embedding network for common thorax disease classification and reporting in chest x-rays. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Xiang L, Qiao Y, Nie D. et al. Deep auto-context convolutional neural networks for standard-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET / MRI. Neurocomputing 2017; 267: 406-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Choi H, Ha S, Im HJ. et al. Refining diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease with deep learning-based interpretation of dopamine transporter imaging. Neuroimage-Clinical 2017; 16: 586-594
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Erro R, Schneider SA, Stamelou M. et al. What do patients with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) have?. New evidence and continuing controversies J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87: 319-323
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Nicastro N, Garibotto V, Badoud S. et al. Scan without evidence of dopaminergic deficit: A 10-year retrospective study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016; 31: 53-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ding Y, Sohn JH, Kawczynski MG. et al. A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using (18)F-FDG PET of the Brain. Radiology 2018; 180958
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Szegedy C, Vanhouke V, Ioffe S. et al. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2015; 2818-2826
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Choi H, Jin KH. Predicting cognitive decline with deep learning of brain metabolism and amyloid imaging. Behav Brain Res 2018; 344: 103-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Lu D, Popuri K, Ding GW. et al. Multiscale deep neural network based analysis of FDG-PET images for the early diagnosis of Alzheimerʼs disease. Med Image Anal 2018; 46: 26-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Segovia F, Gorriz JM, Ramirez J. et al. Using deep neural networks along with dimensionality reduction techniques to assist the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. Log J IGPL 2018; 26: 618-628
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Shi J, Zheng X, Li Y. et al. Multimodal Neuroimaging Feature Learning With Multimodal Stacked Deep Polynomial Networks for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2018; 22: 173-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Zhou T, Thung KH, Zhu X. et al. Effective feature learning and fusion of multimodality data using stage-wise deep neural network for dementia diagnosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40: 1001-1016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Liu M, Cheng D, Yan W. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I. Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease by Combination of Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks Using FDGPET Images. Front Neuroinform 2018; 12: 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Hwang D, Kim KY, Kang SK. et al. Improving the Accuracy of Simultaneously Reconstructed Activity and Attenuation Maps Using Deep Learning. J Nucl Med 2018; 59: 1624-1629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar