Der „critical view of safety“ zur Vermeidung von Gallengangskomplikationen bei der laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie

Zusammenfassung

Die laparoskopische Cholezystektomie ist eine der am häufigsten durchgeführten Operationen weltweit. Gerade aufgrund der hohen Fallzahlen bleibt die iatrogene Verletzung des Ductus choledochus, so selten sie ist, ein nicht zu unterschätzendes Risiko des Eingriffs. Im Laufe der Jahre wurden unterschiedliche Methoden beschrieben, diese schwerwiegende Komplikation mit ihrer hohen Morbidität und sogar Mortalität zu vermeiden. Eine der sichersten Methoden der Vermeidung von Gallengangsläsionen ist die Etablierung des sog. „critical view of safety“ vor Durchtrennung jeglicher Strukturen, der in diesem Lehrvideo demonstriert werden soll.

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed procedures worldwide. Therefore, iatrogenic injury to the choledochal duct, although rare, remains a surgical risk that should not be underestimated. Over the years, various methods have been described to avoid this serious complication, with its high morbidity and even mortality. One of the safest methods to avoid bile duct lesions is to establish the so called “critical view of safety” before cutting any structures. This method shall be demonstrated in this instructional video.

Schlüsselwörter

Abdominalchirurgie - akute Cholezystitis - Cholezystolithiasis

Key words

abdominal surgery - gallstones - gall bladder

Publication History

Article published online:
12 February 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Pesce A, Diana M. Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from the surgeonʼs eye to fluorescent vision. Surg Innov 2018; 25: 197-198
• 2 Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T. et al. Tokyo guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018; 25: 73-86
• 3 [Anonymous] A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1073-1078
• 4 Strasberg S, Brunt L. Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211: 132-138
• 5 Zarin M, Khan MA, Khan MA. et al. Critical view of safety faster and safer technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?. Pak J Med Sci 2018; 34: 574-577
• 6 Olsen DO. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decade of experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000; 7: 35-39
• 7 Davidoff A, Pappas T, Murray E. et al. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1992; 215: 196-202
• 8 Soper N, Flye M, Brunt M. et al. Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 663-669
• 9 Strasberg S, Brunt L. The critical view of safety: why it is not the only method of ductal identification within the standard of care in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 464-465
• 10 Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A. Rouvièreʼs sulcus: a useful landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1253-1254
• 11 Averinos C, Keligiori D, Touloumis Z. et al. One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 498-503
• 12 Heistermann HP, Tobusch A, Palmes D. Der „Sicherheits-Blick“ als Beitrag zur Risikoreduktion bei der laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie. Zentralbl Chir 2006; 131: 460-465
• 13 Strasberg S. Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9: 543-547