Conception and Feasibility of a Digital Tele-Guided Abdomen, Thorax, and Thyroid Gland Ultrasound Course for Medical Students (TELUS study)

Abstract

Purpose Medical education has been transformed during the COVID-19 pandemic, creating challenges regarding adequate training in ultrasound (US). Due to the discontinuation of traditional classroom teaching, the need to expand digital learning opportunities is undeniable. The aim of our study is to develop a tele-guided US course for undergraduate medical students and test the feasibility and efficacy of this digital US teaching method.

Materials and Methods A tele-guided US course was established for medical students. Students underwent seven US organ modules. Each module took place in a flipped classroom concept via the Amboss platform, providing supplementary e-learning material that was optional and included information on each of the US modules. An objective structured assessment of US skills (OSAUS) was implemented as the final exam. US images of the course and exam were rated by the Brightness Mode Quality Ultrasound Imaging Examination Technique (B-QUIET). Achieved points in image rating were compared to the OSAUS exam.

Results A total of 15 medical students were enrolled. Students achieved an average score of 154.5 (SD ± 11.72) out of 175 points (88.29 %) in OSAUS, which corresponded to the image rating using B-QUIET. Interrater analysis of US images showed a favorable agreement with an ICC (2.1) of 0.895 (95 % confidence interval 0.858 < ICC < 0.924).

Conclusion US training via teleguidance should be considered in medical education. Our pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a concept that can be used in the future to improve US training of medical students even during a pandemic.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Das Ziel dieser Studie war die Konzeption eines telemedizinischen Ultraschall (US)-Kurses für Medizinstudierende zu Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie mit anschließender Evaluation praktischer Untersuchungskompetenzen.

Material und Methode Es wurde ein telemedizinischer Ultraschallkurs mit Medizinstudierenden durchgeführt. Die Studierenden absolvierten insgesamt 7 US-Module. Jedes Modul wurde in einem Flipped-Classroom-Konzept mit der Amboss-Plattform konzipiert, um den Studierenden die Möglichkeit zu geben, zusätzliches E-Learning-Material zu nutzen, das optional war und Informationen zu jedem der US-Module lieferte. Als Abschlussprüfung wurde eine objektive Bewertung der US-Kompetenzen (OSAUS) durchgeführt. Zusätzlich wurden die US-Bilder aus Kursstunden und Prüfung mit der B-QUIET-Rating-Methode bewertet und die dort erreichten Punkte mit den Ergebnissen der OSAUS-Prüfung verglichen.

Ergebnisse Insgesamt nahmen 15 Medizinstudierende teil. In OSAUS wurden durchschnittlich 154,5 (SD ± 11,72) von insgesamt 175 Punkten erreicht (88,29 %). Die OSAUS-Ergebnisse stimmen mit der Punktzahl aus der Bildbewertung mit B-QUIET überein. Die Interrater-Analyse der bewerteten US-Bilder zeigte eine gute Übereinstimmung mit einem ICC (2,1) von 0,895 (95 %-Konfidenzintervall 0,858–0,924).

Schlussfolgerungen Die US-Lehre mittels Teleguidance hat sich in dieser Pilotstudie als erfolgreiches Lehrkonzept erwiesen. Dieses zukunftsweisende Lehrkonzept ermöglicht zudem die US-Ausbildung von Medizinstudierenden in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie, in denen Präsenzlehre nicht möglich ist.

Key words

ultrasound education - tele-medicine - tele-ultrasound - course concept - medical students

^* Elena Höhne and Florian Recker contributed equally (first-shared authors).

Publication History

Received: 17 January 2021

Accepted: 09 June 2021

Article published online:
05 July 2021

• References

• 1 Prosch H, Radzina M, Dietrich CF. et al. Ultrasound Curricula of Student Education in Europe: Summary of the Experience. Ultrasound Int Open 2020; 6: E25-E33 DOI: 10.1055/a-1183-3009.
• 2 Dreher SM, DePhilip R, Bahner D. Ultrasound exposure during gross anatomy. J Emerg Med 2014; 46: 231-240 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.028.
• 3 Stringer MD, Duncan LJ, Samalia L. Using real-time ultrasound to teach living anatomy: an alternative model for large classes. N Z Med J 2012; 125: 37-45
• 4 Brown B, Adhikari S, Marx J. et al. Introduction of ultrasound into gross anatomy curriculum: perceptions of medical students. J Emerg Med 2012; 43: 1098-1102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.041.
• 5 So S, Patel RM, Orebaugh SL. Ultrasound imaging in medical student education: Impact on learning anatomy and physical diagnosis. Anat Sci Educ 2017; 10: 176-189 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1630.
• 6 Law J, Macbeth PB. Ultrasound: from Earth to space. Mcgill J Med 2011; 13: 59
• 7 Levine AR, Buchner JA, Verceles AC. et al. Ultrasound images transmitted via FaceTime are non-inferior to images on the ultrasound machine. J Crit Care 2016; 33: 51-55 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.019.
• 8 Yoo SK, Kim DK, Jung SM. et al. Performance of a web-based, realtime, tele-ultrasound consultation system over high-speed commercial telecommunication lines. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10: 175-179 DOI: 10.1258/135763304323070841.
• 9 Butterfly Network, Inc. Retrieved from: https://www.butterflynetwork.com
• 10 Gibson LE, Low SA, Bittner EA. et al. Ultrasound Teleguidance to Reduce Healthcare Worker Exposure to Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2: e0146 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000146.
• 11 Bergmann J, Overmyer J, Wilie B. The Flipped Class: Myths vs. Reality -Retrieved from the daily riff – Be Smarter. About Education 2011 Jul
• 12 Quast A, Weiss J. Die Miamed-Gründungsgeschichte: Für eine bessere Medizin weltweit. In: Bungard P. Hrsg. CSR und Geschäftsmodelle. Auf dem Weg zum zeitgemäßen Wirtschaften. Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility. Berlin: Springer Gabler; 2018: 247-261 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-52882-2_15
• 13 Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High Educ Res Dev 2015; 34: 1-14 DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.
• 14 Amboss GmbH. Sonografie-Videos und Standardschnitte (05.04.2019). Retrieved from (cited: 05.03.2021): https://next.amboss.com/de/article/Cq0q0h
• 15 Tolsgaard MG, Todsen T, Sorensen JL. et al. International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey. PLoS One 2013; 8: e57687 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057687.
• 16 Bahner DP, Adkins EJ, Nagel R. et al. Brightness mode quality ultrasound imaging examination technique (B-QUIET): quantifying quality in ultrasound imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 1649-1655 DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.12.1649.
• 17 Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39: 1137-1150 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq191.
• 18 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428 DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
• 19 Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 3rd ed.. Boston, Mass.: PWS-Kent Publ. Co; 1990
• 20 Wolf R, Geuthel N, Gnatzy F. et al. Undergraduate ultrasound education at German-speaking medical faculties: a survey. GMS J Med Educ 2019; 36: Doc34 DOI: 10.3205/zma001242.
• 21 Gogalniceanu P, Sheena Y, Kashef E. et al. Is basic emergency ultrasound training feasible as part of standard undergraduate medical education?. J Surg Educ 2010; 67: 152-156 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.02.008.
• 22 Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW. et al. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J 1975; 1: 447-451 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447.
• 23 am Dinh V, Dukes WS, Prigge J. et al. Ultrasound Integration in Undergraduate Medical Education: Comparison of Ultrasound Proficiency Between Trained and Untrained Medical Students. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 1819-1824 DOI: 10.7863/ultra.14.12045.
• 24 Hofer M, Kamper L, Sadlo M. et al. Evaluation of an OSCE assessment tool for abdominal ultrasound courses. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 184-190 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246049.
• 25 Todsen T, Tolsgaard MG, Olsen BH. et al. Reliable and valid assessment of point-of-care ultrasonography. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 309-315 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000552.
• 26 Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH. et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 1: CD011736 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2.
• 27 Tomlinson J, Shaw T, Munro A. et al. How does tele-learning compare with other forms of education delivery? A systematic review of tele-learning educational outcomes for health professionals. N S W Public Health Bull 2013; 24: 70-75 DOI: 10.1071/NB12076.
• 28 Steinert Y. Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Med Educ 2004; 38: 286-293 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01772.x.