Download PDF
OP-Journal 2022; 38(02): 112-120
DOI: 10.1055/a-1659-6240
Fachwissen

Resorbierbare Implantate in der Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie

Resorbable Implants in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Carsten Rendenbach
,
Heilwig Fischer
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Kernaussagen

  • Die Osteosynthese auf Titanbasis ist nach wir vor der Goldstandard für die Fixierung von Frakturen, Umstellungsosteotomien und knöcherne Rekonstruktionen in der MKG-Chirurgie.

  • Polylactidbasierte Osteosynthesematerialien bieten vor allem bei Kindern Vorteile, sind für lasttragende Indikationen beim Erwachsenen aber nicht geeignet.

  • Magnesiumbasierte Osteosynthesematerialien sind eine vielversprechende Alternative auch für lasttragende Indikationen.



Publication History

Article published online:
20 January 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Rendenbach C, Schoellchen M, Bueschel J. et al. Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2018; 47: 20170361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rendenbach C, Steffen C, Hanken H. et al. Complication rates and clinical outcomes of osseous free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional fixation in 128 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 48: 1156-1162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kanno T, Sukegawa S, Furuki Y. et al. Overview of innovative advances in bioresorbable plate systems for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Jpn Den Sci Rev 2018; 54: 127-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kreutzer K, Steffen C, Nahles S. et al. Removal of patient-specific reconstruction plates after mandible reconstruction with a fibula free flap: is the plate the problem?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.04.003.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cutright DE, Hunsuck EE, Beasley JD. Fracture reduction using a biodegradable material, polylactic acid. J Oral Surg 1971; 29: 393-397
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 On S-W, Cho S-W, Byun S-H. et al. Bioabsorbable Osteofixation Materials for Maxillofacial Bone Surgery: A Review on Polymers and Magnesium-Based Materials. Biomedicines 2020; 8: 300 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8090300.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bergsma EJ, Rozema FR, Bos RRM. et al. Foreign body reactions to resorbable poly(l-lactide) bone plates and screws used for the fixation of unstable zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 666-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bergsma JE, de Bruijn WC, Rozema FR. et al. Late degradation tissue response to poly(l-lactide) bone plates and screws. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 25-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Edwards RC, Kiely KD, Eppley BL. The fate of resorbable poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid (Lactosorb) bone fixation devices in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59: 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Peltoniemi H, Ashammakhi N, Kontio R. et al. The use of bioabsorbable osteofixation devices in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 5-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sonnow L, Könneker S, Vogt PM. et al. Biodegradable magnesium Herbert screw – image quality and artifacts with radiography, CT and MRI. BMC Med Imaging 2017; 17: 16 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-017-0187-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shellock FG, Mink JH, Curtin S. et al. MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Assessment of ferromagnetism and artifact. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 225-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Roed-Petersen B. Absorbable synthetic suture material for internal fixation of fractures of the mandible. Int J Oral Surg 1974; 3: 133-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bos RR, Boering G, Rozema FR. et al. Resorbable poly(L-lactide) plates and screws for the fixation of zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45: 751-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pina S, Ferreira JMF. Bioresorbable Plates and Screws for Clinical Applications: A Review. J Healthcare Eng 2012; 3: 243-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Buijs GJ, van der Houwen EB, Stegenga B. et al. Mechanical strength and stiffness of biodegradable and titanium osteofixation systems. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 2148-2158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kulkarni RK, Moore EG, Hegyeli AF. et al. Biodegradable poly(lactic acid) polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1971; 5: 169-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Park Y-W. Bioabsorbable osteofixation for orthognathic surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 37: 6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Turvey TA, Bell RB, Tejera TJ. et al. The use of self-reinforced biodegradable bone plates and screws in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 59-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gareb B, van Bakelen NB, Buijs GJ. et al. Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0177152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 van Bakelen NB, Boermans BDA, Buijs GJ. et al. Comparison of the long-term skeletal stability between a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system following BSSO advancement – A cohort study based on a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 52: 721-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Newton JT. et al. Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (02) CD006204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yang L, Xu M, Jin X. et al. Complications of absorbable fixation in maxillofacial surgery: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e67449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tams J, Rozema FR, Bos RRM. et al. Poly(l-lactide) bone plates and screws for internal fixation of mandibular swing osteotomies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 25: 20-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rozema FR, Levendag PC, Bos RRM. et al. Influence of resorbable poly(L-lactide) bone plates and screws on the dose distributions of radiotherapy beams. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 19: 374-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Steffen C, Sellenschloh K, Polster V. et al. Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 121: 377-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kim NK, Nam W, Kim HJ. Comparison of miniplates and biodegradable plates in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53: 223-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ketola-Kinnula T, Suuronen R, Kontio R. et al. Bioabsorbable Plates and Screws for Fixation of Mandibulotomies in Ablative Oral Cancer Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1753-1762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hashemi S, Oda M, Onoue K. et al. Determining the optimal osteotomy distance with the fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol 2020; 41: 102436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ahmad N, Lyles J, Panchal J. et al. Outcomes and complications based on experience with resorbable plates in pediatric craniosynostosis patients. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19: 855-860
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hayden Gephart MG, Woodard JI, Arrigo RT. et al. Using bioabsorbable fixation systems in the treatment of pediatric skull deformities leads to good outcomes and low morbidity. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29: 297-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Fearon JA, Munro IR, Bruce DA. Observations on the use of rigid fixation for craniofacial deformities in infants and young children. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95: 634-637 discussion 638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Yu JC, Bartlett SP, Goldberg DS. et al. An experimental study of the effects of craniofacial growth on the long-term positional stability of microfixation. J Craniofac Surg 1996; 7: 64-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Yu Y, Liu W, Chen J. et al. No Need to Routinely Remove Titanium Implants for Maxillofacial Fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77: 783-788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Witte F. Reprint of: The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: A review. Acta Biomater 2015; 23 (Suppl.) S28-S40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Chakraborty Banerjee P, Al-Saadi S, Choudhary L. et al. Magnesium Implants: Prospects and Challenges. Materials (Basel) 2019; 12: 136 DOI: 10.3390/ma12010136.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Gu X-N, Li S-S, Li X-M et al. Magnesium based degradable biomaterials: A review. Front Mater Sci 2014; 8: 200-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J. et al. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 1728-1734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Angrisani N, Seitz J-M, Meyer-Lindenberg A. et al. Rare Earth Metals as Alloying Components in Magnesium Implants for Orthopaedic Applications. In: IntechOpen 2012 Im Internet (Stand: 02.09.2021): https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/37744
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Torroni A, Xiang C, Witek L. et al. Biocompatibility and degradation properties of WE43 Mg alloys with and without heat treatment: In vivo evaluation and comparison in a cranial bone sheep model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45: 2075-2083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Rendenbach C, Fischer H, Kopp A. et al. Improved in vivo osseointegration and degradation behavior of PEO surface-modified WE43 magnesium plates and screws after 6 and 12 months. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2021; 129: 112380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Imwinkelried T, Beck S, Iizuka T. et al. Effect of a plasmaelectrolytic coating on the strength retention of in vivo and in vitro degraded magnesium implants. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 8643-8649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Schaller B, Matthias Burkhard JP, Chagnon M. et al. Fracture Healing and Bone Remodeling With Human Standard-Sized Magnesium Versus Polylactide-Co-Glycolide Plate and Screw Systems Using a Mini-Swine Craniomaxillofacial Osteotomy Fixation Model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76: 2138-2150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Byun S, Lim H, Cheon K. et al. Biodegradable magnesium alloy (WE43) in bone‐fixation plate and screw. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2020; 108: 2505-2512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Imwinkelried T, Beck S, Schaller B. Pre-clinical testing of human size magnesium implants in miniature pigs: Implant degradation and bone fracture healing at multiple implantation sites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2020; 108: 110389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Windhagen H, Radtke K. Weizbauer Aet al. Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically equivalent to titanium screw in hallux valgus surgery: short term results of the first prospective, randomized, controlled clinical pilot study. Biomed Eng Online 2013; 12: 62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Plaass C, von Falck C, Ettinger S. et al. Bioabsorbable magnesium versus standard titanium compression screws for fixation of distal metatarsal osteotomies – 3 year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sci 2018; 23: 321-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Acar B, Kose O, Turan A. et al. Comparison of Bioabsorbable Magnesium versus Titanium Screw Fixation for Modified Distal Chevron Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 5242806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 May H, Alper Kati Y, Gumussuyu G. et al. Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures. J Orthop Traumatol 2020; 21: 9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Leonhardt H, Ziegler A, Lauer G. et al. Osteosynthesis of the Mandibular Condyle With Magnesium-Based Biodegradable Headless Compression Screws Show Good Clinical Results During a 1-Year Follow-Up Period. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 79: 637-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar