J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84(03): 217-224
DOI: 10.1055/a-1774-6091
Original Article

A Negative-Pressure Face-Mounted System Reduces Aerosol Spread during Endonasal Endoscopic Surgery

Edmond Jonathan Gandham
1   Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
1   Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Latif Rajesh Johnson
2   Department of Forensic Medicine, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Ankush Gupta
1   Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Suresh Devasahayam
4   Department of Bioengineering, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Krishna Prabhu
1   Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Ari George Chacko
1   Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose Due to the potential risk of COVID-19 transmission during endonasal surgery, we studied methods to reduce droplet and aerosol generation during these procedures.

Methods Droplet spread was assessed using ultraviolet light and a camera that detected fluorescence in the operative field and surgeon's personal protective equipment. Density of aerosols sized <10 µm was measured using a photometric particle counter. We designed a face-mounted negative-pressure mask placed on the patients' face during endoscopic endonasal surgery. Sixteen patients were recruited between October 2020 and March 2021 and randomly assigned to the mask and no-mask groups. We compared droplet spread and aerosols generated in both groups, with copious irrigation and continuous suction during drilling forming the mainstay of surgical technique in all cases.

Results Droplet contamination due to direct spillage of fluorescein from the syringe was noted in two patients. Aerosol density rose during sphenoid drilling in both groups, with no significant difference when continuous suction and irrigation were employed (1.27 times vs. 1.07 times the baseline, p = 0.248). Aerosol density rose significantly when suction and irrigation were interrupted in the no-mask group (44.9 times vs. 1.2 times, p = 0.028), which was not seen when the mask was used.

Conclusion Aerosol generation increases during drilling in endonasal procedures and is a concern during this pandemic. The use of a rigid suction close to the drill along with copious irrigation is effective in reducing aerosol spread. The use of a negative pressure mask provides additional safety when inadvertent blockage of suction and inadequate irrigation occur.



Publication History

Received: 13 October 2021

Accepted: 14 February 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 February 2022

Article published online:
17 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Coronavirus WHO.. (COVID-19) Dashboard. Accessed October 4, 2021 at: https://covid19.who.int
  • 2 Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (12) 1177-1179
  • 3 Guo X, Wang J, Hu D. et al. Survey of COVID-19 disease among orthopaedic surgeons in Wuhan, People's Republic of China. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102 (10) 847-854
  • 4 Workman AD, Jafari A, Welling DB. et al. Airborne aerosol generation during endonasal procedures in the era of COVID-19: risks and recommendations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163 (03) 465-470
  • 5 Dharmarajan H, Freiser ME, Sim E. et al. Droplet and aerosol generation with endonasal surgery: methods to mitigate risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 164 (02) 285-293
  • 6 Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Endonasal drilling may be employed safely in the COVID-19 era. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 10 (09) 1118-1119
  • 7 Kim M, Lee M, Schwarz J, Kacker A, Schwartz TH. A novel negative pressure, face-mounted antechamber to minimize aerosolization of particles during endoscopic skull base surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21 (03) 131-136
  • 8 Lee M, Rivera-Rosario HT, Kim MH. et al. Development and validation of a patient face-mounted, negative-pressure antechamber for reducing exposure of healthcare workers to aerosolized particles during endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 2021; 1 (aop): 1-8
  • 9 Woloshin S, Patel N, Kesselheim AS. False negative tests for SARS-CoV-2 Infection—challenges and implications. N Engl J Med 2020; 383 (06) e38
  • 10 Kortela E, Kirjavainen V, Ahava MJ. et al. Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients. PLoS One 2021; 16 (05) e0251661
  • 11 Clerici B, Muscatello A, Bai F. et al. Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection with nasopharyngeal swabs. Front Public Health 2021; 8: 593491
  • 12 Gupta A, Goyal-Honavar A, Jonathan GE. et al. Adapting management strategies for sellar-suprasellar lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a pragmatic approach from the frontline. Br J Neurosurg 2021; 0 (00) 1-8
  • 13 van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH. et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (16) 1564-1567
  • 14 Tellier R, Li Y, Cowling BJ, Tang JW. Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19 (01) 101
  • 15 Workman AD, Welling DB, Carter BS. et al. Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 10 (07) 798-805
  • 16 Sharma D, Rubel KE, Ye MJ. et al. Cadaveric simulation of endoscopic endonasal procedures: analysis of droplet splatter patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163 (01) 145-150
  • 17 David AP, Jiam NT, Reither JM, Gurrola II JG, Aghi MK, El-Sayed IH. Endoscopic skull base and transoral surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: minimizing droplet spread with negative-pressure otolaryngology viral isolation drape. Head Neck 2020; 42 (07) 1577-1582
  • 18 Workman AD, Xiao R, Feng A. et al. Suction mitigation of airborne particulate generated during sinonasal drilling and cautery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 10 (10) 1136-1140
  • 19 Karimzadeh S, Bhopal R, Nguyen Tien H. Review of infective dose, routes of transmission and outcome of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-COV-2: comparison with other respiratory viruses. Epidemiol Infect 2021; 149: e96
  • 20 Basu S. Computational characterization of inhaled droplet transport to the nasopharynx. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 6652
  • 21 Fleseriu M, Buchfelder M, Cetas JS. et al. Pituitary society guidance: pituitary disease management and patient care recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic-an international perspective. Pituitary 2020; 23 (04) 327-337
  • 22 COVIDSurg Collaborative. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet 2020; 396 (10243): 27-38