Clinical Application of Ultrasound-guided Electrode Placement and Detection of Nerve Action Potential

Abstract

Background We explore a minimally invasive method (combined ultrasound detection, electrode placement and electrophysiologic nerve examination) to evaluate the early-stage quality of a nerve suture site.

Methods Ten patients with median and/or ulnar nerve injuries who had undergone nerve suture were recruited. Postoperative ultrasound examination found that the nerve injury was sutured. Then, a stimulating electrode and recording electrode were located beside the nerve proximal and distal to the suture site guided by ultrasound. Measurement of nerve action potentials (NAP) were performed with these electrodes, followed by surgical exploration. The pre- and intraoperative electrophysiologic findings were compared, together with amplitude, latency, and wave shape of NAP.

Results Of the 10 patients, 3 patients were diagnosed with median nerve injury, 2 with ulnar nerve injury, and 5 with the median nerve and ulnar nerve injury. NAP could not be detected pre- and intraoperatively in three median nerves from three patients and in two ulnar nerves from two patients. NAP was detected in 10 nerves from the remaining 5 patients. The pre- and intraoperative NAP results showed consistent results concerning the status of the nerve suture. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test indicated no significant difference in the amplitude and latency detected via sonographically placed electrodes and during surgical exploration. The number of negative-phase waves were equally distributed.

Conclusion Ultrasound-guided electrode placement and NAP detection can substitute surgery and serve as a minimally invasive approach to evaluate the regeneration of a sutured nerve.

Keywords

peripheral nerve injury - ultrasound - nerve action potential - electrophysiologic detection

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was approved by the Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. Written informed consents were obtained from all the patients.

Availability of Data and Material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author's Contributions

D.H. designed the study, conducted the imaging data collection and processing, wrote and edited the draft, and finalized the manuscript. L.X. performed the statistical analysis. J.G.X. participated in writing and editing the draft and finalizing the manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Publication History

Received: 26 January 2022

Accepted: 29 April 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
03 May 2022

Article published online:
17 October 2023

• References

• 1 Gao MY, Liang BL, Xu YB. et al. MRI diagnostic value of brachial plexus post-ganglionic injury. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 1998; 14 (07) 536-538
• 2 Hobson-Webb LD, Massey JM, Juel VC, Sanders DB. The ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119 (06) 1353-1357
• 3 Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, De Zordo T. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 2009; 250 (01) 171-177
• 4 Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, Faschingbauer R. et al. Bifid median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment with US cross-sectional area measurement. Radiology 2011; 259 (03) 808-815
• 5 Paliwal PR, Therimadasamy AK, Chan YC, Wilder-Smith EP. Does measuring the median nerve at the carpal tunnel outlet improve ultrasound CTS diagnosis?. J Neurol Sci 2014; 339 (1–2): 47-51
• 6 Mohamed RE, Amin MA, Aboelsafa AA, Elsayed SE. Contribution of power Doppler and gray-scale ultrasound of the median nerve in evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2014; 45 (01) 191-201
• 7 Lu JZ, Xu JG, Xu WD. et al. Endoscopic intervention in management of peripheral nerve injuries: an experimental study. Chin J Hand Surg 2005; 21 (03) 169-171
• 8 Beekman R, Schoemaker MC, Van Der Plas JP. et al. Diagnostic value of high-resolution sonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurology 2004; 62 (05) 767-773
• 9 Gruber H, Glodny B, Peer S. The validity of ultrasonographic assessment in cubital tunnel syndrome: the value of a cubital-to-humeral nerve area ratio (CHR) combined with morphologic features. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36 (03) 376-382
• 10 Beekman R, Visser LH, Verhagen WI. Ultrasonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a critical review. Muscle Nerve 2011; 43 (05) 627-635
• 11 Boom J, Visser LH. Quantitative assessment of nerve echogenicity: comparison of methods for evaluating nerve echogenicity in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123 (07) 1446-1453
• 12 Scheidl E, Böhm J, Farbaky Z, Simó M, Bereczki D, Arányi Z. Ultrasonography of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: axonal involvement leads to greater nerve swelling than demyelinating nerve lesion. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124 (03) 619-625
• 13 Koenig RW, Schmidt TE, Heinen CP. et al. Intraoperative high-resolution ultrasound: a new technique in the management of peripheral nerve disorders. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (02) 514-521
• 14 Bianchi ML, Padua L, Granata G, Erra C. Double site nerve lesion: ultrasound diagnosed musculocutaneous involvement in traumatic brachial plexus injury. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124 (03) 629-630
• 15 Padua L, Di Pasquale A, Liotta G. et al. Ultrasound as a useful tool in the diagnosis and management of traumatic nerve lesions. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124 (06) 1237-1243
• 16 Al-Nasser B, Hubert C, Négre M. Role of local anesthetic spread pattern and electrical stimulation in ultrasound-guided musculocutaneous nerve block. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22 (05) 334-339
• 17 El-Sawy A, Mohamed NN, Mansour MA. et al. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block in chronic renal failure patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation. Egypt J Anaesth 2014; 30: 161-167