Safety and Efficacy of Combined Imbrication Axle Reconstruction and Z-Type Titanium Plate Fixation for Hinge Fracture Displacement During Open-Door Laminoplasty

Abstract

Background Open-door laminoplasty is a classical decompression method used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, hinge fracture displacement (HFD) is a common occurrence during this procedure. The current study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a combined imbrication axle reconstruction and Z-type titanium plate fixation method for HFD during open-door laminoplasty.

Methods In total, 617 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent C3–C7 open-door laminoplasty from March 2015 to October 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Overall, 73 patients developed HFD during surgery. Of these, 43 underwent combined imbrication axle reconstruction and Z-type titanium plate fixation (IRZF group) and 30 underwent traditional titanium plate fixation (TF group). Data such as the operative time, intraoperative blood loss volume, and distribution of fractured hinges were recorded. Both groups were compared in terms of improvement in neurologic function, cervical curvature index, hinge fusion rate, incidence of C5 palsy, severity of axial symptoms, and development of complications.

Results The operative time and intraoperative blood loss were slightly higher in the IRZF group than in the TF group; however, the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the number of fractured segments and the distribution of fractured hinges (p > 0.05). The cervical curvature index did not decline in the two groups (p > 0.05). The IRZF group had a higher hinge fusion rate than the TF group at 3 (79.6 vs. 57.1%) and 12 (93.9 vs. 74.3%) months postoperatively (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of C5 palsy between the two groups (9.3 vs. 6.7%; p > 0.05). However, the TF group had more severe axial symptoms than the IRZF group (p < 0.05). The neurologic function of the two groups increased postoperatively as per the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in terms of neurologic function at any observational time point (p > 0.05). One patient in the TF group with hinge nonunion underwent laminectomy due to lamina displacement into the spinal canal and nerve root compression.

Conclusion In patients with HFD, IRZF facilitates a more intimate contact between the lamina and the lateral mass and, therefore, achieves fractured hinge fusion without additional surgical trauma. This technical improvement can significantly promote neurologic recovery, decrease the severity of axial symptoms, and prevent the development of spinal cord or nerve root recompression.

Keywords

open-door laminoplasty - cervical spondylotic myelopathy - hinge fracture - cervical curvature - axial symptoms

^* These authors contributed equally to this work.

Publication History

Received: 02 December 2022

Accepted: 05 December 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 December 2022

Article published online:
23 May 2023

• References

• 1 Wang MY, Green BA. Open-door cervical expansile laminoplasty. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (01) 119-123 , discussion 123–124
• 2 Yang HY, Zhang YG, Zhao D. et al. A new posterior extensor attachment-point reconstruction technique for cervical spondylotic myelopathy involving C2 segment: clinical outcome and safety. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 82 (02) 169-175
• 3 Lee DH, Kim H, Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Cho JH, Cho SK. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following hinge fracture during open-door cervical laminoplasty. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 43: 72-76
• 4 Rosinski A, Odeh K, Leasure J, Kondrashov D. Motion preservation at all costs? Multilevel hinge nonunion, plate breakage, and intradural plate migration after cervical laminoplasty: a case report and literature review. World Neurosurg 2020; 135: 80-86
• 5 Lee DH, Park SA, Kim NH. et al. Laminar closure after classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2011; 36 (25) E1634-E1640
• 6 Cho SH, Lee JH, Chough CK. et al. Hinge fracture during cervical open-door laminoplasty: does it affect clinical and radiographic outcomes?. Korean J Spine 2014; 11 (02) 45-51
• 7 Shrestha D, Jun M, Jidong Z, Qiang BJ. Effect of titanium miniplate fixation on hinge fracture and hinge fracture displacement following cervical open-door laminoplasty. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14 (04) 462-475
• 8 Lee JH, Chough CK. Risk factors for hinge fracture associated with surgery following cervical open-door laminoplasty. Korean J Neurotrauma 2018; 14 (02) 118-122
• 9 Chen H, Liu H, Zou L. et al. Effect of mini-plate fixation on hinge fracture and bony fusion in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty. Clin Spine Surg 2016; 29 (06) E288-E295
• 10 Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Fujii R, Yoshikawa H. C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (09) 1375-1379
• 11 Nakajima H, Kuroda H, Watanabe S, Honjoh K, Matsumine A. Risk factors and preventive measures for C5 palsy after cervical open-door laminoplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 20: 1-8
• 12 Xu R, Burgar A, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA. The quantitative anatomy of the laminas of the spine. Spine 1999; 24 (02) 107-113
• 13 Rong X, Wang B, Chen H. et al. Use of rapid prototyping drill template for the expansive open door laminoplasty: a cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 150: 13-17
• 14 Lehman Jr RA, Taylor BA, Rhee JM, Riew KD. Cervical laminaplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008; 16 (01) 47-56
• 15 Rhee JM, Register B, Hamasaki T, Franklin B. Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures. Spine 2011; 36 (01) 9-14
• 16 Liu G, Buchowski JM, Riew KD. Screw back-out following “open-door” cervical laminoplasty: a review of 165 plates. Asian Spine J 2015; 9 (06) 849-854
• 17 Chen H, Deng Y, Li T, Gong Q, Song Y, Liu H. Clinical and radiography results of mini-plate fixation compared to suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty: a five-year follow-up study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 138: 188-195
• 18 Cho SK, Kim JS, Overley SC, Merrill RK. Cervical laminoplasty: indications, surgical considerations, and clinical outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26 (07) e142-e152
• 19 Wang LN, Wang L, Song YM, Yang X, Liu LM, Li T. Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (06) 1267-1274
• 20 Wang M, Luo XJ, Deng QX, Li JH, Wang N. Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (07) 2302-2310
• 21 Li J, Zhang D, Shen Y. Impact of cervical sagittal parameters on axial neck pain in patients with cervical kyphosis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15 (01) 434
• 22 Wang J, Sun T, He X. Impact of different laminae open angles on axial symptoms after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (32) e11823
• 23 Hou SB, Sun XZ, Liu FY. et al. Relationship of change in cervical curvature after laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation to spinal cord shift and clinical efficacy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2022; 83 (02) 129-134