Comparing Different Self-Tonometry Devices against Goldmann Applanation Tonometry – Special Focus on Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea

Abstract

Background Interest in self-tonometry as an additional component to glaucoma monitoring has been increasing for several years. Two self-tonometry devices, Ocuton S and iCare HOME, have seen clinical use, but reports are lacking as to how individual biomechanical corneal properties might influence readings. We compared the two devices against Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) as a reference method.

Patients and Methods Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by GAT and the two self-tonometers, Ocuton S*TT-MV and iCare HOME, on 108 patients with glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, or ocular hypertension at different times in alternating order during diurnal profiling for intraocular pressure. Corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were recorded using an Ocular Response Analyzer^® (ORA) to determine biomechanical corneal properties.

Results We first determined measurement deviations using GAT as the established reference method. The mean difference was − 1.73 ± 2.84 (− 3.95 – 7.41 mmHg) between iCare HOME and GAT, and + 1.49 ± 2.9 mmHg (− 7.29 – 4.31 mmHg) between Ocuton S*TT-MV and GAT. Differences between iCare HOME readings within measurement sequences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Ocuton S*TT-MV did not show any significant difference from GAT using the measurement sequence (p = 0.262; p = 0.063). In contrast, previous tonometry measurements exerted a significant influence on iCare HOME readings. We found a significant correlation in both self-tonometers with corneal thickness on investigating the possible impact of biomechanical corneal properties on self-tonometry results. The impact of corneal thickness on readings was moderate to strong in iCare HOME. IOP values measured using both self-tonometers correlated significantly with CRF values (p < 0.001). Ocuton S*TT-MV values also correlated significantly with CH values (p = 0.024), unlike iCare HOME (p = 0.853).

Conclusion We consider differences in readings using the two self-tonometers compared against GAT as the established reference method to be within acceptable tolerances. Monitoring changes in readings using either device over an extended period – such as gradual increases in intraocular pressure values – is far more important in clinical practice. The measurement sequence requires special consideration due to interplay between measurement methods when comparing readings from different tonometers. We recommend taking iCare HOME readings before applanation tonometry. Biomechanical corneal properties especially need to be considered in iCare HOME and Ocuton S*TT-MV self-tonometers. CRF values affect readings from both self-tonometers. CH values should also be considered when interpreting readings from Ocuton S*TT-MV.

Keywords

Glaucoma - self-tonometry - intraocular pressure - iCare HOME - Ocuton S - Ocular Response Analyzer

• References/Literatur

• 1 Kitazawa Y, Horie T. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 79: 557-566
• 2 Leydhecker W. Der Glaukombegriff. Leydhecker W. Die Glaukome in der Praxis. Ein Leitfaden. 5. Aufl.. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1991: 1-8
• 3 Jampel H. Intraocular Pressure and Tonometry. In: Morrison JC, Pollack IP. eds. Glaucoma. Science and Practice. New York, Stuttgart: Thieme; 2003: 57-69
• 4 Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, Dietsche ML. et al. Individual variability in the diurnal intraocular pressure curve. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 940-944
• 5 Jürgens C, Antal S, Henrici K. et al. Fluktuationen des intraokularen Augendrucks – ein intraindividueller Vergleich zwischen 24-Stunden-Teletonometrie-Monitoring und ambulanter Augendruckmessung. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2009; 226: 54-59
• 6 Yablonski ME, Asamoto A. Hypothesis concerning the pathophysiology of optic nerve damage in open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1993; 2: 119-127
• 7 Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J. et al. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2000; 9: 134-142
• 8 Jürgens C, Grossjohann R, Meiering J. et al. Homemonitoring in der Augenheilkunde–unter welchen Voraussetzungen für mehr Lebensqualität: Schlussfolgerungen aus der Versorgungsforschungsstudie Teletonometrie Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2009; 226: 459-465
• 9 Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E. et al. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 471-476
• 10 Dabasia PL, Lawrenson JG, Murdoch IE. Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1139-1143
• 11 Mudie LI, LaBarre S, Varadaraj V. et al. The Icare HOME (TA022) Study: Performance of an Intraocular Pressure Measuring Device for Self-Tonometry by Glaucoma Patients. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 1675-1684
• 12 Pronin S, Brown L, Megaw R. et al. Measurement of Intraocular Pressure by Patients With Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017; 135: 1030-1036
• 13 Brown L, Foulsham W, Pronin S. et al. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer. J Glaucoma 2018; 27: 511-518
• 14 Termühlen J, Mihailovic N, Alnawaiseh M. et al. Accuracy of Measurements With the iCare HOME Rebound Tonometer. J Glaucoma 2016; 25: 533-538
• 15 Chen E, Quérat L, Åkerstedt C. Self-tonometry as a complement in the investigation of glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94: 788-792
• 16 Noguchi A, Nakakura S, Fujio Y. et al. A Pilot Evaluation Assessing the Ease of Use and Accuracy of the New Self/Home-Tonometer IcareHOME in Healthy Young Subjects. J Glaucoma 2016; 25: 835-841
• 17 Valero B, Fénolland JR, Rosenberg R. et al. Fiabilité et reproductibilité des mesures de la pression intraoculaire par le tonomètre Icare Home (modèle TA022) et comparaison avec les mesures au tonomètre à aplanation de Goldmann chez des patients glaucomateux. J Fr Ophtalmol 2017; 40: 865-875
• 18 Cvenkel B, Velkovska MA, Jordanova VD. Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patientsʼ feasibility and acceptability. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020; 30: 258-263
• 19 Bolla N, Savio E, Bellone A. et al. The Draeger autotonometer: its advantages and limits. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1998; 227: 21-22
• 20 Sacu S, Vass C, Schemper M. et al. Self-tonometry with the Ocuton S: evaluation of accuracy in glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004; 82: 405-409
• 21 Ruokonen PC, Schwenteck T, Draeger J. Klinische Vergleichsmessungen des Selbst-Tonometers Ocuton S mit der Applanationstonometrie nach Goldmann. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222: 227
• 22 Vogt R, Duncker GI. Anwendbarkeit der Selbsttonometrie unter ambulanten Bedingungen zur Gewinnung von Tagesprofilen des intraokularen Druckes. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222: 814-821
• 23 Lanfermann E, Jürgens C, Grossjohann R. et al. Intraocular pressure measurements with the newly reconfigured Ocuton S*TT-MV self-tonometer in comparison to Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients. Med Sci Monit 2009; 15: CR556-CR562
• 24 Marchini G, Babighian S, Specchia L. et al. Evaluation of the new Ocuton S tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002; 80: 167-171
• 25 Liu J, He X, Pan X. et al. Ultrasonic model and system for measurement of corneal biomechanical properties and validation on phantoms. J Biomech 2007; 40: 1177-1182