Z Gastroenterol 2009; 47(6): 583-591
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109332
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Barrett-Frühkarzinom/Hochgradige intraepitheliale Neoplasie (HG-IEN): pro endoskopische Therapie – pro chirurgische Therapie

Early Barrett’s Carcinoma/High Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HG-IEN): Pro Endoscopic Treatment – Pro Surgical TreatmentT. Wehrmann1 , M. Müller1 , R. Arnold2 , A. Sendler3
  • 1Fachbereich Gastroenterologie, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik (DKD) Wiesbaden
  • 2Privat, Wittelsbacherstraße, München
  • 3Chirurgische Klinik, Marienhospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 16.2.2009

Manuskript akzeptiert: 3.3.2009

Publication Date:
16 June 2009 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Wem gehört das Barrett-(Früh-)Karzinom? Das Adenokarzinom des Ösophagus, entstanden auf dem Boden einer Barrett-Schleimhaut, gehört zu den Tumoren, die in den letzten Jahren einen deutlichen Inzidenzanstieg aufweisen. Die Therapie der Tumorvorstufen und des Barrett-Frühkarzinoms wurde in den vergangen Jahren kontrovers diskutiert. Aus endoskopischer Sicht kommt bei hochgradigen intraepithelialen Neoplasien (HG-IEN) eine endoskopische Resektion, weniger die endoskopische Destruktion infrage, während bei einem gesicherten Frühkarzinom eine endoskopische Staging-Resektion sinnvoll erscheint. Gegen chirurgische Verfahren spricht die geringe Wahrscheinlichkeit von Lymphknotenmetastasen bei vorhandener, wenn auch geringer, Morbidität und Mortalität des operativen Eingriffs. Für eine (endoskopische oder operative) Resektion der Läsion spricht, dass kein Stagingverfahren das Ausmaß der Neoplasie sicher beurteilen kann und letztendlich die exakte Tiefeninfiltration des Karzinoms erst im Resektat bestimmbar ist. Vorteil eines operativen Vorgehens hierbei ist, dass eine vollständige Entfernung der Lymphknoten nur chirurgisch gewährleistet werden kann. Die Entfernung der präexistenten Barrett-Schleimhaut erfolgt chirurgisch in jedem Fall, während dies endoskopisch bisher nur unter größerem Aufwand (Einsatz multipler Behandlungssitzungen) möglich ist. Die Operation nach Merendino-Siewert bietet hier eine Option mit geringerer Morbidität und Letalität. Die neuen endoskopischen Resektionsverfahren sind bislang nicht gegen chirurgische Verfahren kontrolliert geprüft. Zusammenfassend sollten Patienten mit einer HG-IEN oder einem Barrett-Frühkarzinom in spezialisierten Zentren, vorzugsweise im Rahmen von Studien, behandelt werden.

Abstract

Who may treat early Barrett’s carcinoma of the oesophagus? The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus developing within Barrett’s mucosa has substantially risen in the past few years. Furthermore, treatment of preneoplastic lesions or early carcinoma is controversial. From an endoscopist’s point of view high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-IEN) should be resected endoscopically rather than destroyed endoscopically while early Barrett’s carcinoma should undergo endoscopic staging resection. Surgical resection is rarely necessary because lymph node metastases are rare and there is some morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure. However, surgeons argue that complete surgical resection is required because no imaging technique reveals the exact extent of the lesion and, ultimately, the degree of infiltration can only be determined within the resected specimen. Also, only surgical procedures may remove all potentially involved regional lymph nodes. Furthermore, only within surgical resections we can eliminate all pre-existing Barrett’s mucosa easily while endoscopic clearance of Barrett’s mucosa is difficult and requires multiple sessions. The Merendino-Siewert procedure may be an option with very low morbidity and mortality. It is worthy of note that new endoscopic resection procedures have not been studied in a controlled fashion against conventional surgical procedures. Therefore, patients with HG-IEN or early Barrett’s carcinoma of the esophagus should be recruited into controlled studies and be treated in specialised high-volume centres.

Literatur

  • 1 Lambert R. Treatment of esophagogastric tumors.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 118-126
  • 2 Soetikno R M, Gotoda T, Nakanishi Y. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 567-579
  • 3 Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T H. et al . Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal cancer.  Gut. 2007;  56 1625-1634
  • 4 Sharma P, Wani S, Rastogi A. Endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: ablate, resect or both?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 469-474
  • 5 Buskens C J, Westerterp M, Lagarde S M. et al . Prediction of appropriateness of local endoscopic treatment for high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma by EUS and histopathological features.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 703-710
  • 6 May A, Günter E, Roth F. et al . Accuracy of staging in oesophageal cancer using high resolution endoscopy and high resolution endosonography: a comparative, prospective, and blinded trial.  Gut. 2004;  53 634-640
  • 7 Pech O, May A, Günter E. et al . The impact of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography on the TNM staging of early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2223-2229
  • 8 Chemaly M, Scalone O, Durivage G. et al . Miniprobe EUS in the pretherapeutic assessment of early esophageal neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 2-6
  • 9 Viklund P, Wengström Y, Rouvelas I. et al . Quality of life and persisting symptoms after oesophageal cancer surgery.  Eur J Cancer. 2006;  42 1407-1414
  • 10 Gondrie J J, Peters F, Curvers W L. et al . Radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus containing high-grade dysplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB135 (abstract)
  • 11 May A, Gossner L, Behrens A. et al . A prospective randomized trial of two different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 167-175
  • 12 Abrams J A, Fedi P, Vakiani E. et al . Depths of resection using two different endoscopic mucosal resection techniques.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 395-399
  • 13 Kakushima N, Yahagi N, Fujishiro M. et al . Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for tumors of the esophagogastric junction.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 170-174
  • 14 Puli S, Rastogi A, Mathur S. et al . Development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus an high-grade dysplasia undergoing surveillance: a meta-analysis and systematic review.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB83 (abstract)
  • 15 Mörk H, Al-Taie O, Berlin F. et al . High recurrence rate of Barrett epithelium during long-term follow-up after argon plasma coagulation.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;  42 23-27
  • 16 Pech O, Gossner L, May A. et al . Long-term results of photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid for superficial Barrett’s cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 24-30
  • 17 Peters F, Kara M, Rosmolen W. et al . Poor results of 5-aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy for residual high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett esophagus after endoscopic resection.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 418-424
  • 18 Prasad G A, Wang K K, Buttar N S. et al . Predictors of stricture formation after photodynamic therapy for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 60-66
  • 19 Overholt B F, Lightdale C J, Wang K K. et al . Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 488-498
  • 20 Overholt B F, Wang K K, Burdick S. et al . Five-year efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy with Photofrin in Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 460-468
  • 21 Prasad G A, Wang K K, Buttar N S. et al . Long-term survival following endoscopic and surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 1226-1233
  • 22 Ganz R A, Utley D S, Stern R A. et al . Complete ablation of esophageal epithelium with a balloon-based bipolar electrode: a phased evaluation in the porcine and in the human esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 1002-1010
  • 23 Johnston M H, Eastone J A, Horwhat J D. et al . Cyroablation of Barrett’s esophagus: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 842-848
  • 24 Sharma P, Jaffe P E, Bhattacharyya A. et al . Laser and multipolar electrocoagulation ablation of early Barrett’s adenocarcinoma: long-term follow-up.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 442-446
  • 25 Ell C, May A, Gossner L. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 670-677
  • 26 Nijhawan P K, Wong K K. Endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions with endoscopic features suggestive of malignancy and high-grade dysplasia within Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 328-332
  • 27 Buttar N S, Wang K K, Lutzke L S. et al . Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy for esophageal neoplasia within Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 682-688
  • 28 Wehrmann T, Lange P, Nakamura M. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection of pre-malignant lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  Z Gastroenterol. 2001;  39 919-928
  • 29 May A, Gossner L, Pech O. et al . Intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in short-segment Barrett’s esophagus (SSBE): curative treatment using local endoscopic treatment techniques.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 604-610
  • 30 Seewald S, Akaraviputh T, Seitz U. et al . Circumferential EMR and complete removal of Barrett’s epithelium: a new approach to management of Barrett’s esophagus containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and intramucosal carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 854-859
  • 31 Giovannini M, Bories E, Pesenti C. et al . Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 782-787
  • 32 Behrens A, May A, Gossner L. et al . Curative treatment for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 999-1005
  • 33 Conio M, Repici A, Cestari R. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade displasia and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: an Italian experience.  World J Gastroenterol. 2005;  11 6650-6655
  • 34 Peters F P, Kara M A, Rosmolen W D. et al . Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 506-514
  • 35 Peters F P, Kara M A, Rosmolen W D. et al . Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 1449-1457
  • 36 Wehrmann T, Frenz M B, Martchenko K. et al . Prospektive Evaluation nach endoskopischer Resektion von T 1-Oesophaguskarzinomen.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 923 (abstract)
  • 37 Ell C, May A, Pech O. et al . Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinoma (Barrett’cancer).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 3-10
  • 38 Pech O, Behrens A, May A. et al . Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus.  Gut. 2008;  57 1200-1206
  • 39 Manner H, May A, Pech O. et al . Early Barrett’s carcinoma with low-risk submucosal invasion: long-term results of endoscopic resection with a curative intent.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 2589-2597
  • 40 Katada C, Muto M, Manabe T. et al . Esophageal stenosis after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial esophageal lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 165-167
  • 41 Pouw R E, Peters F P, Sempoux C. et al . Stepwise radical resection for Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: report on a Brussel cohort.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 892-898
  • 42 Gondrie J J, Pouw R E, Sondermeijer C MT. et al . Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: results of the first prospective series of 11 patients.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 359-369
  • 43 Gondrie J J, Pouw R E, Sondermeijer C MT. et al . Effective treatment of early Barrett’s neoplasia with stepwise circumferential and focal ablation using the HALO system.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 370-379
  • 44 Rahden B H, Stein H J. Endoscopic mucosal resection as curative therapy for esophageal cancer is inappropriate and should be discouraged.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 169
  • 45 DeMeester S R. EMR for intramucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: does one size fit all?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 14-15
  • 46 Altorki N K, Lee P C, Liss von Y. et al . Multifocal neoplasia and nodal metastases in T 1 esophageal carcinoma: implications for endoscopic treatment.  Ann Surg. 2008;  247 434-439
  • 47 Ormsby A H, Petras R E, Henricks W H. et al . Observer variation in the diagnosis of superficial oesophageal adenocarcinoma.  Gut. 2002;  51 671-676
  • 48 Korst R J, Altorki N K. High grade dysplasia: surveillance, mucosal ablation, or resection?.  World J Surg. 2003;  27 1030-1034
  • 49 Conio M, Cameron A J, Chak A. et al . Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus.  Lancet Oncol. 2005;  6 311-321
  • 50 Wang Y P, Bennett C, Pan T. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  Issue 1 CD004276
  • 51 DeMeester S R. Endoscopic mucosal resection and vagal-sparing esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  17 320-325
  • 52 Stein H J, Feith M, Bruecher B L. et al . Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term survival after surgical resection.  Ann Surg. 2005;  242 566-573
  • 53 Hölscher A H, Schneider P M, Gutschow C. et al . Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement.  Ann Surg. 2007;  245 241-246
  • 54 Vieth M, Ell C, Gossner L. et al . Histological analysis of endoscopic resection specimens from 326 patients with Barrett’s esophagus and early neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 776-781
  • 55 Ban S, Mino M, Nishioka N S. et al . Histopathologic aspects of photodynamic therapy for dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus.  Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;  28 1466-1473
  • 56 Westhoff B, Brotze S, Weston A. et al . The frequency of Barrett’s esophagus in high-risk patients with chronic GERD.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 226-231
  • 57 Rex D K, Cummings O W, Shaw M. et al . Screening for Barrett’s esophagus in colonoscopy patients with and without heartburn.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 1670-1677
  • 58 Newnham A, Quinn M J, Babb P. et al . Trends in the subsite and morphology of oesophageal and gastric cancer in England and Wales 1971 – 1998.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  17 665-676
  • 59 Dulai G S, Guha S, Kahn K L. et al . Preoperative prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  122 26-33
  • 60 Koop H, Schepp W, Müller-Lissner S. et al . Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit – Ergebnisse einer evidenzbasierten Konsensuskonferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten Z.  Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 163-194
  • 61 Shaheen N J, Crosby M A, Bozymski E M. et al . Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett’s esophagus?.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 333-338
  • 62 Martinek J, Benes M, Brandt P. et al . Low incidence of adenocarcinoma and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective cohort study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 711-716
  • 63 Eckardt V F, Kanzler G, Bernhard G. Life expectancy and cancer risk in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective controlled investigation.  Am J Med. 2001;  111 33-37

Prof. Till Wehrmann

Fachbereich Gastroenterologie, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik (DKD)

Aukammallee 33

65191 Wiesbaden

Email: till.wehrmann@dkd-wiesbaden.de

    >