Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2009; 13(2): 097-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1220880
© Thieme Medical Publishers

MR Imaging of Bone Metastases and Choice of Sequence: Spin Echo, In-Phase Gradient Echo, Diffusion, and Contrast Medium

Daniel Vanel1 , 2 , Roberto Casadei4 , Marco Alberghini5 , Manel Razgallah2 , 3 , Maurizio Busacca1 , Ugo Albisinni1
  • 1Department of Radiology, Institut Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
  • 2Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
  • 3Department of Radiology, Institut Charles Nicolle, Tunis, Tunisia
  • 4Department of Surgery, Institut Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
  • 5Department of Pathology, Institut Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 May 2009 (online)

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the only imaging technique allowing the direct visualization of the bone marrow and is the most sensitive to detect bone metastases. Sensitivity is high, but a good understanding and an informed choice of acquisition sequences can easily improve specificity. Fat and water distribution (spin echo), indirect visualization of bone trabeculae (in-phase gradient echo), evaluation of bone edema and cell density (diffusion), and the study of vascularization (contrast medium) should be cleverly combined to enable good detection and lesion characterization.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ghanem N, Altehoefer C, Högerle S et al.. Comparative diagnostic value and therapeutic relevance of magnetic resonance imaging and bone marrow scintigraphy in patients with metastatic solid tumors of the axial skeleton.  Eur J Radiol. 2002;  43(3) 256-261
  • 2 Kattapuram S V, Khurana J S, Scott J A et al.. Negative scintigraphy with positive magnetic resonance imaging in bone metastases.  Skeletal Radiol. 1990;  19 113-116
  • 3 Algra P R, Bloem J L, Tissing H, Falke T H, Arndt J W, Verboom L J. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy.  Radiographics. 1991;  11(2) 219-232
  • 4 Hanna S L, Fletcher B D, Fairclough D L, Jenkins III J H, Le A H. Magnetic resonance imaging of disseminated bone marrow disease in patients treated for malignancy.  Skeletal Radiol. 1991;  20(2) 79-84
  • 5 Mirowitz S A, Apicella P, Reinus W R, Hammerman A M. MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;  162(1) 215-221
  • 6 Glover G H, Schneider E. Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction.  Magn Reson Med. 1991;  18(2) 371-383
  • 7 Seiderer M, Staebler A, Wagner H. MRI of bone marrow: opposed-phase gradient-echo sequences with long repetition time.  Eur Radiol. 1999;  9(4) 652-661
  • 8 Ragab Y, Emad Y, Gheita T et al.. Differentiation of osteoporotic ans neoplastic vertebral fractures by chemical shift (in-phase and out-of phase) MR imaging.  Eur J Radiol. 2008;  , July 29 (Epub ahead of print)
  • 9 Zajick Jr D C, Morrison W B, Schweitzer M E, Parellada J A, Carrino J A. Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow.  Radiology. 2005;  237(2) 590-596
  • 10 Fransson A, Grampp S, Imhof H. Effects of trabecular bone on marrow relaxation in the tibia.  Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;  17(1) 69-82
  • 11 Sebag G H, Moore S G. Effect of trabecular bone on the appearance of marrow in gradient-echo imaging of the appendicular skeleton.  Radiology. 1990;  174(3 Pt 1) 855-859
  • 12 Baur A, Stäbler A, Brüning R et al.. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures.  Radiology. 1998;  207(2) 349-356
  • 13 Amano Y, Hayashi H, Kumazaki T. Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI of reactive hematopoietic regions in marrow.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;  18(2) 214-217
  • 14 Saifuddin A, Bann K, Ridgway J P, Butt W P. Bone marrow blood supply in gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.  Skeletal Radiol. 1994;  23(6) 455-457
  • 15 Baker L L, Goodman S B, Perkash I, Lane B, Enzmann D R. Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.  Radiology. 1990;  174(2) 495-502
  • 16 Cuénod C A, Laredo J D, Chevret S et al.. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images.  Radiology. 1996;  199(2) 541-549
  • 17 Vanel D, Bittoun J, Tardivon A. MRI of bone metastases.  Eur Radiol. 1998;  8(8) 1345-1351
  • 18 Holscher H C, van der Woude H J, Hermans J, Nooy M A, Doornbos J, Bloem J L. Magnetic resonance relaxation times of normal tissue in the course of chemotherapy: a study in patients with bone sarcoma.  Skeletal Radiol. 1994;  23(3) 181-185

Daniel VanelM.D. 

Anatomia Patologica, The Rizzoli Institute

Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40106, Bologna, Italy

Email: daniel.vanel@ior.it

    >