Comparison of Protocols for Walking and Running Kinematics Based on Skin Surface Markers and Rigid Clusters of Markers

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the two main types of marker sets for human body representation based on rigid clusters of markers and skin surface markers for measuring kinematics during walking and running. Velocity, body segment, and joint angle were considered in the comparison of both protocols. Six male athletes were studied during treadmill gait at 1.4 and 5.5 m/s and recorded with 8 high speed video cameras. The subjects used simultaneously both protocols in the same walking and running cycles, in order to compare the variability in the determination of the joint centers’ positions and the joint angles calculated from each protocol. The three-way ANOVA results showed that the variability of the inter-markers distance in the skin surface protocol was higher than that in the rigid clusters of markers, as reported in the literature. However, no statistical differences between the protocols were found in the variability of the determination of the joint centers’ positions. Therefore no advantage was verified to rigid cluster protocols even for the upper body segments. Another conclusion is that increases in velocity produced increases in variability of the joint centers’ distances and increases in the maximum differences between the joint angles.

Key words

biomechanics - running - walking - kinematics - lower extremity - upper extremity

References

• 1 Angeloni C, Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A. Quantification of relative displacement of skin- and plate-mounted markers with respect to bones.  J Biomech. 1993;  26 864
• 2 Barros RML, Russomano TG, Brenzikofer R, Figueroa PJ. A Method to synchronize video cameras using the audio band.  J Biomech. 2006;  39 776-780
• 3 Bell AL, Pedersen DR, Brand RA. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods.  J Biomech. 1990;  23 617-621
• 4 Benoit DL, Ramsey DK, Lamontagne M, Xu L, Wretenberg P, Renstrom P. Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo.  Gait Posture. 2006;  24 152-164
• 5 Butler RJ, Davis IM, Hamill J. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.  Am J Sports Med. 2006;  34 1998-2005
• 6 Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Croce UD. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination.  Clin Biomech. 1995;  10 171-178
• 7 Cappozzo A, Croce UD, Leardini A, Chiari L. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background.  Gait Posture. 2005;  21 186-196
• 8 Chan PY, Wong HK, Hong Goh JC. The repeatablity of spinal motion of normal and scoliotic adolescents during walking.  Gait Posture. 2006;  24 219-228
• 9 Chiari L, Croce UD, Leardini A, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry – Part 2. Instrumental errors.  Gait Posture. 2005;  21 197-211
• 10 Croce UD, Leardini A, Chiari L, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics.  Gait Posture. 2005;  21 226-237
• 11 Eslami M, Begon M, Farahpour N, Allard P. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.  Clin Biomech. 2007;  22 74-80
• 12 Ferber R, Davis IM, Willian III DS. Effect of foot orthotics on rearfoot and tibia joint coupling patterns and variability.  J Biomech. 2005;  38 477-483
• 13 Ferrari A, Benedetti MG, Pavan E, Frigo C, Bettinelli D, Rabuffetti M, Crena P, Leardini A. Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis.  Gait Posture. 2008;  28 207-216
• 14 Houck J, Yack HJ, Cuddeford T. Validity and comparisons of tibiofemoral orientations and displacement using a femoral tracking device during early to mid stance of walking.  Gait Posture. 2004;  19 76-84
• 15 Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Segment-interaction analysis of the stance limb in sprint running.  J Biomech. 2004;  37 1439-1446
• 16 Leardini A, Chiari L, Croce UD, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry – Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation.  Gait Posture. 2005;  21 212-225
• 17 Meskers CGM, van der Helm FCT, Rozendaal LA, Rozing PM. In vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center from scapular bony landmarks by linear regression.  J Biomech. 1998;  31 93-96
• 18 McLean C, Davis IM, Hamill J. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners.  Clin Biomech. 2006;  21 623-630
• 19 Newman CJ, Walsh M, Sullivan R, Jenkinson A, Bennett D, Lunch B, Brien T. The characteristics in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types I and II.  Gait Posture. 2007;  26 120-127
• 20 Novacheck TF. The biomechanics of running.  Gait Posture. 1998;  7 77-95
• 21 Reinbolt JA, Schutteb JF, Fregly BJ, Kohc B Il, Haftk RT, Georgec AD, Mitchell KH. Determination of patient-specific multi-joint kinematic models through two-level optimization.  J Biomech. 2005;  38 621-626
• 22 Reinschmidt C, van der Bogert AJ, Lundberg A, Nigg BM, Murphy N, Stacoff A, Stano A. Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking: external vs. skeletal markers.  Gait Posture. 1997;  6 98-109
• 23 Sangeux M, Marin F, Charleux F, Durselen L, Ho Ba Tho MC. Quantification of 3D relative of external marker sets vs. bones based on magnetic resonance imaging.  Clin Biomech. 2006;  21 984-991
• 24 Sudhoff I, Driessche V, Laporte S, Guise JA, Skalli W. Comparing three attachment systems used to determine knee kinematics during gait.  Gait Posture. 2007;  25 533-543
• 25 Wuang N. Multi-criterion optimization for heel–toe running.  J Biomech. 2005;  38 1712-1716
• 26 Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima D, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stoke I. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – part I: ankle, hip, and spine.  J Biomech. 2002;  35 543-548
• 27 Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – part II: shoulder,elbow, wrist and hand.  J Biomech. 2005;  38 981-992

Correspondence