Download PDF
Cent Eur Neurosurg 2011; 72(1): 5-14
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1241850
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Outcome of Craniocerebral Gunshot Injuries in the Civilian Population. Prognostic Factors and Treatment Options

A. K. Petridis1 [*] , A. Doukas[*] , H. Barth1 , M. Mehdorn1
  • 1University Kiel, Neurosurgery, Kiel, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 March 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aim: Gunshot wounds to the head are rare in Europe. They may be inflicted by low-velocity handguns, captive bolt guns and tear gas cartridges and mostly result from suicide attempts. The experience of neurosurgeons with this kind of traumatic injury is decreasing; the aim of this study was therefore to analyse prognostic factors which help to decide whether or not to operate and to discuss treatment options.

Methods: Thirty patients with gunshot head injuries treated in our hospital from 1993 to 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, pupil reactivity, lesion localisation, number of bone fragments, intracranial pressure (ICP), midline shift, hypotension, and dural penetration were analysed for their prognostic value. Surgically and non-surgically treated patients were evaluated separately. Complications were registered.

Results: A low GCS of 3–8, fixed pupils, >2 bone fragments, bilobar or posterior fossa/brainstem lesions and ICP >45 mmHg were indicators of a poor prognosis.

Conclusion: Patients with a GCS of 3–8 and two non-reactive pupils should not be operated. If one or both of the pupils are reactive, surgery should be performed irrespective of the GCS score, except in patients with translobar/transventricular wounds. Even if there are no clear contraindications to surgery, the outcome is expected to be poor in patients with a low GCS score, midline shift >10 mm, >2 bone fragments in the brain, and a bilobar, posterior fossa/brainstem or ventricular lesion and ICP >45 mmHg. When surgery is performed the wound and the missile or bone track should be debrided meticulously, the wound and dura should be closed in a watertight fashion and antibiotic prophylaxis as well as tetanus serum should be given.

Key words

gunshot - cranial injury - handgun - brain edema

References

  • 1 Aarabi B. Surgical outcome in 435 patients who sustained missile head wounds during the Iran-Iraq war.  Neurosurgery. 1990;  27 692-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Aarabi B, Alden TD, Chesnut RM. et al . Management and prognosis of penetrating brain injury.  J Trauma. 2001;  51 (2)) S1-S86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Askenasy JJ. Association of intracerebral bone fragments and epilepsy in missile head injuries.  Acta Neurol Scand. 1989;  79 (1) 47-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brandt F, Roosen K, Weiler G. et al . Neurosurgical management of gunshot injuries to the head.  Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1983;  26 164-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brandvold B, Levi L, Feinsod M. et al . Penetrating craniocerebral injuries in the Israeli involvement in the Lebanese conflict, 1982–1985. Analysis of a less aggressive surgical approach.  J Neurosurg. 1990;  72 15-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cavaliere R, Cavenago L, Siccardi D. et al . Gunshot wounds of the brain in civilians.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;  94 133-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Crevenna R, Klintschar M, Weger M. et al . Therapy of head injuries caused by animal slaughter guns.  Wien Med Wochenschr. 2003;  153 (1–2) 37-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Doctor VS, Farwell DG. Gunshot wounds to the head and neck.  Curr Opin Otorlaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;  15 (4) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dösoglu M, Orakdögen M, Somay H. et al . Civilian gunshot wounds to the head.  Neurochirurgie. 1999;  45 (3) 201-207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gajdos M, Vyrostko J. Brain injuries with abattoir guns.  Rozhl Chir. 1997;  76 (10) 518-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Giese A, Koops E, Lohmann F. et al . Head injury by gunshots from blank cartridges.  Surg Neurol. 2002;  57 268-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grahm TW, Williams Jr FC, Harrington T. et al . Civilian gunshot wounds to the head: A prospective study.  Neurosurgery. 1990;  27 (5) 696-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hagan RE. Early complications following penetrating wounds of the brain.  J Neurosurg. 1971;  34 132-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Harat M, Szolna A, Bialozyk P. Facial-cerebral gunshot wounds.  Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2000;  34 (3) 487-500
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kaufman HH, Levy ML, Stone JL. et al . Patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores 3, 4, 5 after gunshot wounds to the brain.  Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1995;  6 (4) 701-714
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kaufman HH, Makela ME, Lee KF. et al . Gunshot wound to the head: a perspective.  Neurosurgery. 1986;  18 (6) 689-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kaufman HH, Schwab K, Salazar AM. A national survey of neurosurgical care for penetrating head injury.  Surg Neurol. 1991;  36 370-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kohlmeier RE, McMahan CA, DiMaio VJ. Suicide by firearms: A 15-year experience.  Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2001;  22 (4) 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kon T, AkiyamaK, Aiba T. Shotgun injury of head and neck: case report.  No Shinkei Geka. 2002;  30 (5) 517-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Levy ML. Outcome prediction following penetrating craniocerebral injury in a civilian population: Aggressive surgical management in patients with admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 6 to 15.  Neurosurg Focus. 2000;  8 (1) e2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Santos MTS. et al . Prognostic factors and treatment of penetrating gunshot wounds to the head.  Surg Neurol. 2003;  60 98-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mosdal C. Cranio-cerebral injuries from Slaughterer's gun.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1985;  74 (1–2) 31-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Murano T, Mohr AM, Lavery RF. et al . Civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds: An update in predicting outcomes.  Am Surg. 2005;  71 (12) 1009-1014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reiss M, Reiss G, Pilling E. Gunshot injuries in the head-neck area – basic principles, diagnosis and management.  Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998;  87 (24) 832-838
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rosenfeld JV. Gunshot injury to the head and spine.  Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2002;  9 (1) 9-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Shoung HM, Sichez JP, Pertuiset B. The early prognosis of craniocerebral gunshot wounds in civilian practice as an aid to the choice of treatment. A series of 56 cases studied by the computerized tomography.  Acta Neurochir. 1985;  74 27-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Stone JL, Lichtor T, Fitzgerald LF. et al . Demographics of civilian cranial gunshot wounds: devastation related to escalating semiautomatic usage.  J Trauma. 1995;  38 (6) 851-854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Suddaby L, Weir B, Forsyth C. The management of 0.22 caliber gunshot wounds of the brain: A review of 49 cases.  Can J Neurol Sci. 1987;  14 (3) 268-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tsuei YS, Sun MH, Lee HD. et al . Civilian gunshot wounds to the brain.  J Chin Med Assoc. 2005;  68 (3) 126-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vrankovic D, Splavski B, Hecimovic I. et al . Self-inflicted gunshot wounds to the head during the war and post-war period.  Injury. 1998;  29 (5) 369-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

1 Equal contribution

Correspondence

Dr. A. K. Petridis

University Kiel, Neurosurgery,

Schittenhelmstraße 10

24106 Kiel

Germany

Phone: +49-431-597-4911

Fax: +49-431-597-4883

Email: opticdisc@aol.com

      >