Download PDF
Rofo 2010; 182(11): 947-953
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245627
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aktueller Stand der MR-gesteuerten Prostata-Interventionen

MR-Guided Interventions of the Prostate Gland: a Literature ReviewS. Zangos1 , K. Eichler1 , A. Thalhammer1 , M. G. Mack1 , F. Marquardt2 , T. J. Vogl1
  • 1Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, J.-W.-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
  • 2Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, J.-W.-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 15.2.2010

angenommen: 2.7.2010

Publication Date:
19 August 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

In den letzen Jahren spielt die MRT in der Diagnostik und Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms eine immer wichtigere Rolle. Die MRT erlaubt neben der Abgrenzung der anatomischen Strukturen auch die Lokalisation möglicher Tumoren durch die Verwendung von T 2-gewichteten Sequenzen, der Spektroskopie sowie dynamischer Untersuchungen. Die gute Abgrenzbarkeit der Tumoren erlaubt eine sichere Durchführung von Prostatainterventionen, wie Biopsien, Brachytherapie oder verschiedenen lokalen Thermotherapien. Durch den zusätzlichen Einsatz von Robotersystemen kann die Genauigkeit der Interventionen erhöht werden. Aufgrund der Vorteile der MR-Bildgebung ist zu erwarten, dass MR-gesteuerte Prostatainterventionen in der Zukunft eine zunehmende Rolle spielen werden.

Abstract

In recent years MR imaging has played an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. MR imaging of the prostate allows clear delineation of the anatomic structures and prostate tumors using T 2-weighted images combined with spectroscopy and dynamic examinations. The advantages of MRI make it possible to perform interventions, like biopsies, brachytherapy or different local therapies of the prostate gland. MRI robotic assistance will improve the accuracy of the interventions. Due to the advantages of MR imaging, MR-guided prostate interventions will play a greater role in the future.

Key words

prostate - ablation procedures - biopsy - interventional MR - interventional procedures

Literatur

  • 1 Sakr W A, Grignon D J, Crissman J D et al. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between the ages of 20 – 69: an autopsy study of 249 cases.  In vivo. 1994;  8 439-443
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Mueller-Lisse U L, Hofstetter A. Urologische Diagnostik des Prostatakarzinoms.  Radiologe. 2003;  43 432-440
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Andriole G L, Crawford E D, Grubb 3 rd R L et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.  The New England journal of medicine. 2009;  360 1310-1319
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Naughton C K, Miller D C, Mager D E et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection.  J Urol. 2000;  164 388-392
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Tempany C, Straus S, Hata N et al. MR-guided prostate interventions.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;  27 356-367
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Stewart C S, Leibovich B C, Weaver A L et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies.  J Urol. 2001;  166 86-91 ; discussion 91 – 82
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Pegios W, Bentas W, Wittmann L et al. Kernspintomographisches Staging des Prostatakarzinoms mittels kombinierter Endorektal-Body-Phased-Array-Spule und histopathologische Korrelation.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2003;  175 1660-1666
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Engelbrecht M R, Jager G J, Laheij R J et al. Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.  Eur Radiol. 2002;  12 2294-2302
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Stanka M, Eltze E, Semjonow A et al. Spektroskopische Bildgebung (1 H-MR-CSI) der Prostata: Sequenzoptimierung und Korre-lation mit histopathologischen Untersuchungen.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2000;  172 623-629
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Scheidler J, Vogel M, Gross P et al. Kombinierte MRT und MRS beim Prostatakarzinom: Beschleunigung und Verbesserung durch Suszeptibilitätsangleichung.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2009;  181 531-535
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Wiesinger B, Lichy M P, Nagele U et al. MR-Befundmuster der Prostata bei Patienten mit CPP Syndrom (chronic pelvic pain syndrome).  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 621-630
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Franiel T, Ludemann L, Taupitz M et al. Pharmakokinetische MRT der Prostata: Parameter zur Unterscheidung von Low-grade- und High-grade-Prostatakarzinomen.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2009;  181 536-542
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Kemper J, Sinkus R, Lorenzen J et al. MR-Elastographie der Prostata: Erste In-vivo-Anwendung.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2004;  176 1094-1099
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Prando A, Kurhanewicz J, Borges A P et al. Prostatic biopsy directed with endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging findings in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and prior negative biopsy findings: early experience.  Radiology. 2005;  236 903-910
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Kaplan I, Oldenburg N E, Meskell P et al. Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy.  Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;  20 295-299
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Gupta S, Nguyen H, Morello F et al. Various Approaches for CT-guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Deep Pelvic Lesions: Anatomic and Technical Considerations.  Radiographics. 2004;  24 175-189
    Google Scholar
  • 17 D’Amico A V, Tempany C M, Cormack R et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy.  J Urol. 2000;  164 385-387
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility.  Radiology. 2001;  220 263-268
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Zangos S, Eichler K, Engelmann K et al. MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results.  Eur Radiol. 2005;  15 174-182
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5T: initial results.  Radiology. 2005;  234 576-581
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Engelhard K, Hollenbach H P, Kiefer B et al. Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device.  Eur Radiol. 2006;  16 1237-1243
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Zangos S, Herzog C, Eichler K et al. MR-compatible assistance system for punction in a high-field system: device and feasibility of transgluteal biopsies of the prostate gland.  Eur Radiol. 2007;  17 1118-1124
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Lewin J S, Duerk J L, Jain V R et al. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation.  Am J Roentgenol. 1996;  166 1337-1345
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Adam G, Bucker A, Nolte-Ernsting C et al. Interventional MR imaging: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen.  Eur Radiol. 1999;  9 1471-1478
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Cormack R A, D’Amico A V, Hata N et al. Feasibility of transperineal prostate biopsy under interventional magnetic resonance guidance.  Urology. 2000;  56 663-664
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Zangos S, Kiefl D, Eichler K et al. MRT-gezielte perkutane Biopie bei unklaren fokalen Leberläsionen: Technik und Ergebnisse.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2003;  175 688-694
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Franiel T, Fritzsche F, Staack A et al. [Histopathologic quality of prostate core biopsy specimens: comparison of an MR-compatible biopsy needle and a ferromagnetic biopsy needle used for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy] Histopathologische Qualität von Prostatazylindern: Vergleich einer MR-kompatiblen Biopsienadel mit einer im Ultraschall eingesetzten ferromagnetischen Biopsienadel.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2006;  178 1212-1218
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Duckwiler G, Lufkin R B, Hanafee W N. MR-directed needle biopsies.  Radiol Clin North Am. 1989;  27 255-263
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hambrock T, Futterer J J, Huisman H J et al. Thirty-two-channel coil 3 T magnetic resonance-guided biopsies of prostate tumor suspicious regions identified on multimodality 3 T magnetic resonance imaging: technique and feasibility.  Invest Radiol. 2008;  43 686-694
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Van Gellekom M P, Moerland M A, Battermann J J et al. MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy with single needle method – a planning study.  Radiother Oncol. 2004;  71 327-332
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Prada P J, Gonzalez H, Fernandez J et al. High-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external-beam radiotherapy improves local and biochemical control in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.  Clin Transl Oncol. 2008;  10 415-421
    Google Scholar
  • 32 D’Amico A V, Cormack R, Tempany C M et al. Real-time magnetic resonance image-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;  42 507-515
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Chen L, Price R A, Wang Jr L et al. MRI-based treatment planning for radiotherapy: dosimetric verification for prostate IMRT.  International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2004;  60 636-647
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Tanaka O, Hayashi S, Matsuo M et al. MRI-based preplanning in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.  Radiother Oncol. 2008;  88 115-120
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Polo A, Cattani F, Vavassori A et al. MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants.  International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2004;  60 1572-1579
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Menard C, Susil R C, Choyke P et al. MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5 T scanner.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;  59 1414-1423
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Susil R C, Camphausen K, Choyke P et al. System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5T MRI scanner.  Magn Reson Med. 2004;  52 683-687
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Hurwitz M D, Cormack R, Tempany C M et al. Three-dimensional real-time magnetic resonance-guided interstitial prostate brachytherapy optimizes radiation dose distribution resulting in a favorable acute side effect profile in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.  Techniques in urology. 2000;  6 89-94
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Albert M, Tempany C M, Schultz D et al. Late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity after magnetic resonance image-guided prostate brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy.  Cancer. 2003;  98 949-954
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Nguyen P L, Chen M H, D’Amico A V et al. Magnetic resonance image-guided salvage brachytherapy after radiation in select men who initially presented with favorable-risk prostate cancer: a prospective phase 2 study.  Cancer. 2007;  110 1485-1492
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Vogl T J, Straub R, Lehnert T et al. Perkutane Thermoablation von Lungenmetastasen – Erfahrungen mit dem Einsatz der LITT, der Radiofrequenzablation (RFA) und Literaturübersicht[Percutaneous Thermoablation of Pulmonary Metastases.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2004;  176 1658-1666
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Vogl T J, Mack M G, Muller P K et al. Interventional MR: interstitial therapy.  Eur Radiol. 1999;  9 1479-1487
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Peters R D, Chan E, Trachtenberg J et al. Magnetic resonance thermometry for predicting thermal damage: an application of interstitial laser coagulation in an in vivo canine prostate model.  Magn Reson Med. 2000;  44 873-883
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Nau W H, Diederich C J, Ross A B et al. MRI-guided interstitial ultrasound thermal therapy of the prostate: a feasibility study in the canine model.  Med Phys. 2005;  32 733-743
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Josan S, Bouley D M, Bosch van den M et al. MRI-guided cryoablation: In vivo assessment of focal canine prostate cryolesions.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;  30 169-176
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Tazaki H, Deguchi N, Baba S et al. Magnetic resonance imaging following microwave thermotherapy, laser ablation and transurethral resection in patients with BPH.  Urologe A. 1995;  34 105-109
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Mueller-Lisse U G, Thoma M, Faber S et al. Coagulative interstitial laser-induced thermotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia: online imaging with a T 2-weighted fast spin-echo MR sequence – experience in six patients.  Radiology. 1999;  210 373-379
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Chen J C, Moriarty J A, Derbyshire J A et al. Prostate cancer: MR imaging and thermometry during microwave thermal ablation-initial experience.  Radiology. 2000;  214 290-297
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Pauly K B, Diederich C J, Rieke V et al. Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity ultrasound ablation of the prostate.  Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;  17 195-207
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Kettenbach J, Kronreif G, Figl M et al. Robot-assisted biopsy using computed tomography-guidance: initial results from in vitro tests.  Invest Radiol. 2005;  40 219-228
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Felden A, Vagner J, Hinz A et al. ROBITOM-robot for biopsy and therapy of the mamma.  Biomed Tech. 2002;  47 2-5
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Hempel E, Fischer H, Gumb L et al. An MRI-compatible surgical robot for precise radiological interventions.  Comput Aided Surg. 2003;  8 180-191
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Dimaio S P, Pieper S, Chinzei K et al. Robot-assisted needle placement in open MRI: System architecture, integration and validation.  Comput Aided Surg. 2007;  12 15-24
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Susil R C, Krieger A, Derbyshire J A et al. System for MR image-guided prostate interventions: canine study.  Radiology. 2003;  228 886-894
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Fischer G S, DiMaio S P, Iordachita I I et al. Robotic assistant for transperineal prostate interventions in 3 T closed MRI.  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;  10 425-433
    Google Scholar

Dr. Stephan Zangos

Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, J.-W.-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

Theodor-Stern-Kai 7

60596 Frankfurt

Phone: ++ 49/63 01/72 77

Fax: ++ 49/63 01/72 58

Email: Zangos@em.uni-frankfurt.de

      >