Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and patient experience

Gynecologists have been performing transvaginal surgery for over a century and consequently the transvaginal approach was advocated for establishing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in gynecological and surgical practice. From 2008 the NOTES alternative has been offered to selected patients. Transvaginal cholecystectomies were intended in 13 patients and completed in 12. Various additional procedures were performed. All surgical procedures and postoperative courses were uneventful. The mean operating time for transvaginal cholecystectomy only was 88.4 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 17.3). A questionnaire was posted to the patients after a mean follow-up of 8.5 months. Patients primarily chose transvaginal NOTES because of the lack of scarring. Vaginal sensation was not affected. Patients perceived transgastric, transvesical, and transrectal surgery to be less acceptable approaches. The feasibility of transvaginal NOTES was proven for different indications. Patients’ experiences and perceptions concerning transvaginal NOTES were excellent.

References

• 1 Freund W A. Das Bindegewebe im weiblichen Becken und seine pathologische Veränderung. Die Gynäkologische Klinik. Bd. 1. Strasbourg; Trübner 1885
• 2 Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P. et al . Transvaginal access: a safe technique for tubo-ovarian exploration in infertility? Review of the literature.  Gynecol Surg. 2008;  5 187-191
• 3 Dubcenco E, Assumpcao L, Dray X. et al . Adhesion formation after peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy in a survival porcine model: comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy, and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 971-978
• 4 Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M. et al . Trocar site hernia.  Arch Surg. 2004;  139 1248-1256
• 5 Kobiela J, Stefaniak T, Mackowiak M. et al . NOTES-third generation surgery. Vain hopes or the reality of tomorrow?.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;  393 405-411
• 6 Peterson C, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B. et al . Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery.  Surg Endos. 2009;  23 1770-1774
• 7 Hagen M E, Wagner O J, Christen D. et al . Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 581-583
• 8 Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman E. Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 854-860
• 9 Thele F, Zygmunt M, Glitsch A. et al . How do gynecologists feel about transvaginal NOTES surgery?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 576-580
• 10 Linke G R, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R. et al . Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice.  Endoscopy. 2010;  April 29 [Epub ahead of print]
• 11 Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L. et al . Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 391-394
• 12 Voermans R P, Worm A M, van Berge Henegouwen M I. et al . Technology development and assessment: in vitro comparison and evaluation of seven gastric closure modalities for NOTES.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 595-601
• 13 Hackethal A, Ionesi-Pasacica J, Eskef K. et al . Transvaginal NOTES with semi rigid and rigid endoscopes that allow adjustable viewing angles.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010b;  March 25 [Epub ahead of print]
• 14 Ramos A C, Murakami A, Galvão Neto M. et al . NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 572-575
• 15 Gettman M T, Cadeddu J A. Natural orifice tranlsumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in urology: initial experience.  J Endourol. 2008;  22 783-788