Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2010; 119(9): 416-425
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267442
Wissenschaft
Parodontologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Vergleich zweier DNA-basierter Methoden zum Nachweis parodontopathogener Bakterien

Comparison of two DNA-based Methods for Detection of Periodontopathogenic BacteriaW. Pfister, A. Straube, A. Güntsch, H. Jentsch, S. Eick
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 September 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Eine In-house-Real-time-PCR zum Nachweis parodontopathogener Erreger sollte mit dem kommerziell erhältlichen Testkit microIdent® bzw. microIdent®plus verglichen werden. Dazu wurden 308 subgingivale Plaqueproben von 27 Patienten mit chronischer Parodontitis vor Beginn der komplexen parodontalen Therapie sowie 3, 6 und 12 Monate danach mit beiden Methoden untersucht. Die Ergebnisse korrelierten signifikant miteinander, sodass beide Verfahren zur Diagnostik und Therapiekontrolle eingesetzt werden können.

An in house real time-PCR for detection of periodontopathogenic bacteria was to compare with the commercially available testkit microIdent® resp. microIdent®plus. 308 subgingival plaque samples from 27 patients with chronic periodontitis were investigated with both methods before and 3, 6 and 12 months after periodontal treatment. Results correlated significantly. Following this both methods can be used for diagnostics and treatment control.

Schlüsselwörter

DNA-basierter Keimnachweis –mikrobiologische Diagnostik –Therapiekontrolle - parodontopathogene Bakterien - chronische Parodontitis

Key words

DNA-based Detection of Bacteria - Microbiological Diagnostics - Treatment Control - Periodontopathogenic Bacteria - Chronic Periodontitis

Literatur

  • 1 Ashimoto A, Chen C, Bakker I et al.. Polymerase chain reaction detection of 8 putative periodontal pathogens in subgingival plaque of gingivitis and advanced periodontitis lesions.  Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1996;  11 266-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Christodoulides N, Nikolidakis D, Chondros P et al.. Photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.  J Periodontol. 2008;  79 1638-1644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Colombo AP, Boches SK, Cotton SL et al.. Comparisons of subgingival microbial profiles of refractory periodontitis, severe periodontitis, and periodontal health using the human oral microbe identification microarray.  J Periodontol. 2009;  80 1421-1432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Consensus report. . Periodontal diseases: pathogenesis and microbial factors.  Ann Periodontol. 1996;  1 926-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dahlen G.. Microbiological dignostics in oral diseases.  Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;  64 164-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Eguchi T, Koshy G, Umeda M et al.. Microbial changes in patients with acute periodontal abscess after treatment detected by Pado Test.  Oral Dis. 2008;  14 180-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Eick S, Pfister W.. Comparison of microbial cultivation and a commercial PCR based method for detection of periodontopathogenic species in subgingival plaque samples.  J Clin Periodontol. 2002;  29 638-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fouad AF, Barry J, Caimano M et al.. PCR-based identification of bacteria associated with endodontic infections.  J Clin Microbiol. 2002;  40 3223-3231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Guentsch A, Jentsch H, Pfister W et al.. Moxifloxacin as an adjunctive antibiotic in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis.  J Periodontol. 2008;  79 1894-1903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Haffajee AD, Patel M, Socransky SS.. Microbiological changes associated with four different periodontal therapies for the treatment of chronic periodontitis.  Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008;  23 148-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Haffajee AD, Yaskell T, Torresyap G et al.. Comparison between polymerase chain reaction-based and checkerboard DNA hybridization techniques for microbial assessment of subgingival plaque samples.  J Clin Periodontol. 2009;  36 642-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Holt SC, Ebersole JL.. Porphyromonas gingivalis, treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia: the “red complex”, a prototype polybacterial pathogenic consortium in periodontitis.  Periodontol 2000. 2005;  38 72-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jervoe-Storm PM, Koltzscher M, Falk W et al.. Comparison of culture and real-time PCR for detection and quantification of five putative periodontopathogenic bacteria in subgingival plaque samples.  J Clin Periodontol. 2005;  32 778-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kumar PS, Leys EJ, Bryk JM et al.. Changes in periodontal health status are associated with bacterial community shifts as assessed by quantitative 16S cloning and sequencing.  J Clin Microbiol. 2006;  44 3665-3673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lyons SR, Griffen AL, Leys EJ.. Quantitative real-time PCR for Porphyromonas gingivalis and total bacteria.  J Clin Microbiol. 2000;  38 2362-2365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mombelli A, Gmur R, Gobbi C et al.. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in adult periodontitis. II. Characterization of isolated strains and effect of mechanical periodontal treatment.  J Periodontol. 1994;  65 827-834
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Morillo JM, Lau L, Sanz M et al.. Quantitative real-time PCR based on single copy gene sequence for detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis.  J Periodontal Res. 2003;  38 518-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rozen S, Skaletsky H.. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.  Methods Mol Biol. 2000;  132 365-386
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rudney JD, Chen R, Pan Y.. Endpoint quantitative PCR assays for Bacteroides forsythus, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.  J Periodontal Res. 2003;  38 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Savitt ED, Strzempko N, Vaccaro KK et al.. Comparison of cultural methods and DNA probe analyses for the detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides gingivalis, and Bacteroides intermedius in subgingival plaque samples.  J Periodontol. 1988;  59 431-438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA et al.. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque.  J Clin Periodontol. 1998;  25 134-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Smith C et al.. Use of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization to study complex microbial ecosystems.  Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004;  19 352-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Socransky SS, Smith C, Martin L et al.. „Checkerboard“ DNA-DNA hybridization.  Botechniques. 1994;  17 788-792
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tran S, Rudney J.. Improved multiplex PCR using conserved and species-specific 16rRNA gene primers for simultaneous detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides forsythus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis.  J Clin Microbiol. 1999;  37 3504-3508
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Verner C, Lemaitre P, Daniel A et al.. Carpegen real-time polymerase chain reaction vs. anaerobic culture for periodontal pathogen identification.  Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;  21 341-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Prof. Wolfgang Pfister

Universitätsklinikum Jena Medizinische Universitätslaboratorien, Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie

Erlanger Allee 101

07747 Jena

Email: Wolfgang.Pfister@med.uni-jena.de

      >