Ultraschall Med 2012; 33(4): 337-343
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273317
Übersicht/Review

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Relevance and Methods of Interventional Breast Sonography in Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Staging

Bedeutung und Technik der präoperativen interventionellen Abklärung des Lymphknotenstatus bei Patientinnen mit primärem MammakarzinomI. Gruber1 , M. Hahn1 , T. Fehm1 , C. Hann von Weyhern2 , A. Stäbler1 , A. Winckelmann3 , D. Wallwiener1 , T. Kühn3
  • 1Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tübingen
  • 2Pathology, University of Tübingen
  • 3Gynecology and Obstetrics, Städtische Kliniken Esslingen
Further Information

Publication History

received: 29.7.2010

accepted: 1.3.2011

Publication Date:
26 May 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Reduktion der therapieinduzierten Morbidität ist ein wichtiges Ziel für die Verbesserung der Behandlungsqualität beim Mammakarzinom. Die Einführung der Sentinellymphknotenbiopsie (SLNB) hat dazu beigetragen, die operationsbedingte Morbidität im Schulter-Arm-Bereich erheblich zu reduzieren. Allerdings gilt der klinisch positive Nodalstatus nach wie vor als eine Kontraindikation für die SLNB. Die aktuelle Datenlage macht aber deutlich, dass die klinische und auch sonografische Dignitätseinschätzung zur Evaluation nicht ausreichend ist, um den Nodalstatus mit der notwendigen Genauigkeit zu erfassen. Die alleinige klinische und/oder bildgebende Beurteilung des axillären Lymphknotenstatus würde zu einer Übertherapie von 40 % der Patientinnen führen. Um die Rate an unnötigen Axilladissektionen (AD) zu reduzieren, ist eine prätherapeutische interventionelle Abklärung notwendig, die genauere Information über den feingeweblichen Zustand des Lymphknotens liefert. Im Vergleich der aktuell verfügbaren Methoden erweist sich die Feinnadelaspiration (FNA) in Bezug auf den Kosten-, Zeitaufwand, Praktikabilität, Komplikationsrate als das beste Abklärungsverfahren, ist jedoch in Bezug auf die Sensitivität der sonografisch gesteuerten Stanzbiopsie unterlegen. Ein negatives Ergebnis der FNA erfordert daher eine weitere Abklärung, die gegebenenfalls durch die CNB vorgenommen werden kann. Bei einer Spezifität von nahezu 100 % kann bei einem positiven Ergebnis der FNA die Indikation zur kompletten Axilladissektion gestellt werden.

Abstract

Reduction of therapy-induced morbidity is an important goal for the improvement of the quality of breast cancer treatment. The introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) significantly contributed to the reduction of surgery-induced morbidity in the shoulder-arm region. However, a clinically positive nodal status is still considered a contra-indication for SLNB. The current data constellation clearly shows that the clinical and also the sonographic malignancy assessment is insufficient for the accurate identification of the nodal status. A merely clinical and/or image-based appraisal of the axillary lymph node status would lead to overtreatment due to unnecessary axillary dissection in approximately 40 % of patients. In order to reduce the rate of unnecessary axillary dissection (AD), pretreatment interventional clarification is necessary to provide more detailed information about the histological condition of the lymph node. Comparing the currently available methods, fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the best in terms of cost and time requirement, practicability and complication rate. However, considering the sensitivity, it is inferior to ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB). Thus, a negative FNA outcome requires further clarification, which possibly can be performed with CNB. With a specificity of nearly 100 % and therefore a low rate of false positive cases for FNA, complete AD can be indicated by a positive FNA result. In the context of the interventional procedure, it must be stressed that FNA requires a high level of expertise on the part of both the examiner and the cytologist. The prerequisite for optimal interventional diagnostics of lymph nodes is an adequate sonographic assessment on the basis of standardized sonomorphological criteria.

References

  • 1 Carter C L, Allen C, Henson D E. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status and survival in 24 740 breast cancer cases.  Cancer. 1989;  63 181-187
  • 2 Kreienberg R. Interdiszilinäre S 3-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. . Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (Hrsg) Zuckerschwerdt-Verlag; 2008
  • 3 http://www.ago-online.org
  • 4 Kühn T, Vogl F D, Helms G et al. Sentinel Node-Biopsy is a reliable method for axillary staging in breast cancer: results from a large prospective German multi-institutional trail.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;  30 252-259
  • 5 Zavagno G, Carcoforo P, Franchini Z et al. Axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary dissection: a study on 479 breast cancer patients.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;  31 715-720
  • 6 Kühn T, Bembenek A, Decker T et al. A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance.  Cancer. 2005;  103 451-461
  • 7 Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  349 546-553
  • 8 Helms G, Kühn T, Moser L et al. Shoulder-arm morbidity in patients with sentinel node biopsy and complete axillary dissection – data from a prospective randomized trail.  Eur J Surg Oncolo. 2009;  35 696-701
  • 9 Cutler S J, Axtell L M, Schottenfeld D et al. Clinical assessment of lymph nodes in carcinoma of the breast.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970;  131 41-52
  • 10 Fisher B, Wolmark N, Banes M. The accuracy of clinical nodal staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant of histologic nodal status in carcinoma of the breast.  Gynecol Obstet. 1981;  152 765-772
  • 11 De Freitas R, Costa M V, Schneider S V et al. Accuracy of ultrasound and clinical examination in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991;  17 240-244
  • 12 Vaidya J S, Vyas J J, Thakur M H et al. Role of ultrasound to detect axillary node involvement in operable breast cancer.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;  22 140-143
  • 13 Specht M C, Fey J V, Borgen P I et al. Is the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy?.  J Am Coll Surg. 2005;  200 11-14
  • 14 Rijk M C, Deurloo E E, Nieweg O E et al. Ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;  13 31-35
  • 15 Abe van H, Schmidt R A, Kulkarni K et al. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: Sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy- clinical experience in 100 patients.  Radiology. 2009;  250 1
  • 16 Yuen S, Sawai K, Ushijima Y et al. Evaluation of axillary status in breast cancer. CT – based determination of sentinel lymph node size.  Acta Radiol. 2002;  43 579-586
  • 17 Yamagami T, Yuen S, Sawai K et al. MR imaging-guided axillary node biopsy for breast cancer: initial findings.  Eur Radiol. 2004;  14 151-156
  • 18 Wahl R L, Siegel B A, Coleman R E et al. PET Study Group. Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET study group.  J Clin Oncol. 2004;  22 227-285
  • 19 Pamilo M, Sovia M, Lavast E M. Real time ultrasound, axillary mammography, and clinical examination in the detection of axillray lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.  J Ultrasound Med. 1989;  8 115-120
  • 20 Chae B J, Bae J S, Kang B J et al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the detection of axillay lymph node metastasis in patients with early stage breast cancer.  Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;  39 284-289
  • 21 Ahn J H, Son E J, Kim J A et al. The role of ultrasonography and FPG-PET in axillary lymph node staging of breast cancer.  Acta Radiol. 2010;  51 859-865
  • 22 Madjar H, Ohlinger R, Mundinger A et al. BIRADS-Analogue Degum Criteria for Findings in Breast Ultrasound – Consensus of the DEGUM Committee on Breast Ultrasound.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 374-379
  • 23 Tateishi T, Machi J, Feleppa E J et al. In vitro B-mode ultrasound criteria for diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis for breast cancer.  J Ultrasound Med. 1999;  18 349-359
  • 24 Bedi D G, Krishnamurthy R, Krishnamurthy S et al. Cortical Morphologic Features of Axillary Lymph Nodes as a Predictor of Metastasis in Breast Cancer: In Vitro Sonograpgic Study.  AJR. 2008;  191 646-652
  • 25 Koehler K E, Ohlinger R. Sensitivity and Specificity of Preoperative Ultrasound for Diagnosing Nodal Metastases in Patients with Breast Cancer.  Ultraschall in Med. 2010;  DOI: DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245505
  • 26 Yang W T, Chang J, Metreweli C. Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.  Radiology. 2000;  215 568-573
  • 27 Coi Y J, Ko E Y, Han B K et al. High- resolution ultrasonographic features of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer.  Breast. 2009;  18 119-22
  • 28 Steppan I, Reimer D, Müller-Holzner E et al. Breast cancer in women: evaluation of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.  Ultraschall in Med. 2010;  31 63-67
  • 29 Bailek E J, Jakubowski W, Szczepanik A B et al. 3D Ultrasound Examination of the Superficial Lymph Nodes – Does it Provide Additional Information?.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 467-472
  • 30 Botar-Jid C, Fodor D, Dudea S M et al. Sonoelastography of superficial lymph node enlargement: benign vs. malignant.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29: OP_15_5
  • 31 Steppan I, Reimer D, Müller-Holzner E et al. Breast cancer in women: evaluation of benign and malignant axillary lamph nodes with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.  Ultraschall in Med. 2010;  31 63-67
  • 32 Nori J, Vanzi E, Bazzocchi M et al. Role of axillary ultrasound examination in the selection of breast cancer patients for sentinel node biopsy.  Am J Surg. 2007;  193 16-20
  • 33 Podkrajsek M, Music M M, Kadivec M et al. Role of ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer.  Eur Radiol. 2005;  15 1044-1050
  • 34 Deurloo E E, Tanis P J, Gilhuijs K G et al. Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer.  Eur J Cancer. 2003;  39 1068-1073
  • 35 Damera A, Evans A J, Cornford E J et al. Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer.  Br J Cancer. 2003;  89 1310-1313
  • 36 Rajesh Y S, Ellenbogen S, Banerjee B. Preoperative axillary ultrasound scan: its accuracy in assessing the axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast.  Breast. 2002;  11 49-52
  • 37 Hahn M, Kagan K O, Siegmann K C et al. Mammotome versus ATEC: a comparison of two breast vacuum biopsy techniques under sonographic guidance.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 
  • 38 Hahn M, Okamgba S, Scheler P et al. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a comparison of 11-gauge and 8-gauge needles in benign breast disease.  World J Surg Oncol. 2008;  6 51
  • 39 Berg W A, Campassi C I, Ioffe O B. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation.  Radiology. 2003;  227 183-191
  • 40 Venta L A, Kim J P, Pelloski C E et al. Management of complex breast cysts.  Am J Roentgenol. 1999;  173 1331-1336
  • 41 Albert U S. Stufe-3-Leitlinien. Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Senologie e.V, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (Hrsg), Zuckerschwerdt-Verlag; 2008
  • 42 Kishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi D G et al. Role of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.  Cancer. 2002;  95 982-988
  • 43 Hanley Z, Birdsong G, Cohen C et al. Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast carcinomas.  Cancer Cytopathol. 2009;  117 279-288
  • 44 Rao R, Lilley L, Andrews V et al. Axillary staging by percutaneous biopsy:sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;  16 1342-1348
  • 45 Bedrosian I, Bedi D, Kuerer H M. Impact of clinicopathological factors on sensitivity of axillary ultrasonography in the detection of axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;  10 1025-1030
  • 46 Kuenen-Boumeester V, Menke-Pluymers M, Kanter A Y et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. A preoperative procedure.  Eur J Cancer. 2003;  39 170-174
  • 47 Podkrajsek de M, Music M M, Kadivec M et al. Role of ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer.  Eur Radiol. 2005;  15 1044-1050
  • 48 Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P et al. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in the breast cancer: A systemic review.  Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  186 1342-1348
  • 49 Ciatto S, Brancato B, Risso G et al. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging.  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006; 
  • 50 Somasundar P, Gass J, Steinhoff M et al. Role of ultrasound-guided axillary fine-needle aspiration in the management of invasive breast cancer.  Am J Surg. 2006;  192 458-461
  • 51 Altomare V, Guerriero G, Carino R et al. Axillary lymph node echo-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology enables breast cancer patients to avoid a sentinel lymph node biopsy. Preliminary experience and a review of the literature.  Surg Today. 2007;  37 735-739
  • 52 Alkuwari E, Auger M. Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.  ancer Cytopathology. 2008;  114 89-93
  • 53 Schiettecatte A, Bourgain C, Breucq C et al. Initial axillary staging of breast cancer usinf ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a liquid-based cytology study.  Cytopathology. 2011;  22 30-35
  • 54 Damera A, Evans A J, Cornford E J. Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer.  Br J Cancer. 2003;  89 1310-1313
  • 55 Topal U, Punar S, Taşdelen I et al. Role of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in the staging of breast carcinoma.  Eur J Radiol. 2005;  56 382-385
  • 56 Garcia-Ortega M J, Benito M A, Vahamonde E F et al. Pretreatment axillary ultrasonography and core biopsy in patients with suspect breast cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and impact on management.  Eur J Radiol. 2010, Jan 2; 
  • 57 Hinson J L, McGrath P, Moore A et al. The critical role of axillary ultrasound and aspiration biopsy in the management of breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;  15 250-255
  • 58 Bomeisl Jr P E, Alam S, Wakely Jr P E. Interinstitutional consultation in fine-needle aspiration cytopathology: a study of 742 cases.  Cancer Cytopathol. 2009;  117 237-246
  • 59 He Q, Fan X, Yuan T et al. Eleven years of experience reveals the fine-needle aspiration cytology is still a useful method for preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.  Breast. 2007;  16 303-306

Dr. Ines Gruber

Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tübingen

Calwerstraße 7

72076 Tübingen

Germany

Phone:  ++ 49/70 7œ 98 22 11

Fax:  ++ 49/70 71/3 54 77

Email: ines.gruber@med.uni-tuebingen.de

    >