Download PDF
Synlett 2012(1): 123-127  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1290095
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

An Enantiospecific Formal Total Synthesis of the 5-8-5 Tricyclic Diterpene ent-Fusicoauritone

A. Srikrishna*, Gopalasetty Nagaraju
Department of Organic Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
Fax: +91(80)3600683; e-Mail: askiisc@gmail.com;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 26 October 2011
Publication Date:
09 December 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

An enantiospecific formal total synthesis of the 5-8-5 tricyclic diterpene fusicoauritone has been accomplished, starting from 5-isopropyl-2-methylcyclopent-1-enemethanol [available in three steps from (R)-dihydrolimonene] employing two ring-closing-metathesis reactions for the construction of the eight- and five-membered rings.

Key words

fusicoccanes - limonene - enantiospecific synthesis - cyclooctanoids - ring-closing metathesis

    References and Notes

  • 1a Barrow KD. Barton DHR. Chain E. Conlay C. Smale TC. Thomas R. Waight ES. J. Chem. Soc. C.  1971,  1259 
    Google Scholar
  • 1b Barrow KD. Barton DHR. Chain E. Ohnsorge UFW. Thomas R. J. Chem. Soc. C  1971,  1265 
    Google Scholar
  • 2a Tassa T. Togashi M. Agric. Biol. Chem. (Japan)  1973,  37:  1505 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Huneck S. Baxter G. Cameron AF. Connolly JD. Rycroft DS. Tetrahedron Lett.  1983,  24:  3787 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Asakawa Y. Lin X. Tori M. Kondo K. Phytochemistry  1990,  29:  2597 
    Google Scholar
  • 2d Zapp J. Burkhardt G. Becker H. Phytochemistry  1994,  37:  787 
    Google Scholar
  • 2e Liu H.-J. Wu C.-L. Becker H. Zapp J. Phytochemistry  2000,  53:  845 
    Google Scholar
  • 2f Komala I. Ito T. Nagashima F. Yagi Y. Kawahata M. Yamaguchi K. Asakawa Y. Phytochemistry  2010,  71:  1387 
    Google Scholar
  • 2g Gilabert M. Ramos AN. Schiavone MM. Arena ME. Bardon A. J. Nat. Prod.  2011,  74:  574 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 For detailed biological profiles of fusicoccins, see references cited in: Richter A. Hedberg C. Waldmann H. J. Org. Chem.  2011,  76:  6694 
    Google Scholar
  • 4a Mehta G. Singh V. Chem. Rev.  1999,  99:  881 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Petasis NA. Patane MA. Tetrahedron  1992,  48:  5757 
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Dake GR. Fenster EE. Patrick BO. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  73:  6711 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Williams DR. Robinson LA. Nevill CR. Reddy JP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  915 
    Google Scholar
  • 7a Srikrishna A. Babu NC. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  4913 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Srikrishna A. Babu NC. Dethe DH. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem.  2003,  42:  1688 
    Google Scholar
  • 7c Srikrishna A. Dethe DH. Org. Lett.  2003,  5:  2295 
    Google Scholar
  • 7d Srikrishna A. Babu NC. Rao MS. Tetrahedron  2004,  60:  2125 
    Google Scholar
  • 7e Srikrishna A. Pardeshi VH. Satyanarayana G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2010,  21:  746 
    Google Scholar
  • 7f Srikrishna A. Pardeshi VH. Tetrahedron  2010,  66:  6810 
    Google Scholar
  • 7g Srikrishna A. Pardeshi VH. Mahesh K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2010,  21:  2512 
    Google Scholar
  • 7h Srikrishna A. Pardeshi VH. Mahesh K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2010,  21:  2830 
    Google Scholar
  • 7i Srikrishna A. Nagaraju G. Ravi G. Synlett  2010,  3015 
    Google Scholar
  • 7j Srikrishna A. Nagaraju G. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem.  2011,  50:  73 
    Google Scholar
  • 7k Srikrishna A. Dethe DH. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem.  2011,  50:  1092 
    Google Scholar
  • 7l Srikrishna A. Seth VM. Nagaraju G. Synlett  2011,  2343 
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Johnson WS. Werthemann L. Bartlett WR. Brocksom TJ. Li T.-t. Faulkner DJ. Petersen R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1970,  92:  741 
    Google Scholar
  • 9a Grubbs RH. Chang S. Tetrahedron  1998,  54:  4413 
    Google Scholar
  • 9b Fürstner A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2000,  39:  3013 
    Google Scholar
  • 9c Trnka TM. Grubbs RH. Acc. Chem. Res.  2001,  34:  18 
    Google Scholar
  • 9d Grubbs RH. Tetrahedron  2004,  60:  7117 
    Google Scholar
10

Yields refer to isolated and chromatographically pure compounds. All the compounds exhibited spectroscopic data (IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and HRMS) consistent with their structures.
Selected Spectroscopic Data for (1 S ,8 R ,9 S )-9-Isopropyl-1-methylbicyclo[6.3.0]undec-4-en-3-one (5)
[α]D ²6 -196.6 (c 1.4, CHCl3). IR (neat): νmax = 3019, 1660 (C=O), 1388, 1369, 1243, 1202, 1152, 839, 768 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.49-6.33 (1 H, m, H-3), 6.19 (1 H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, H-4), 2.81 (1 H, d, J = 12.2 Hz, H-2A), 2.90-2.75 (1 H, m), 2.48 (1 H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, H-2B), 2.60-2.34 (1 H, m), 2.04-1.25 (9 H, m), 0.97 (3 H, s, t-CH3), 0.90-0.85 [6 H, m, CH(CH 3)2]. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 201.2 (C, C=O), 148.2 (CH, C-5), 137.0 (CH, C-4), 54.2 (CH2, C-2), 46.5 (CH, C-8), 42.1 (CH, C-9), 41.7 (C, C-1), 39.3 (CH2), 29.3 (CH), 25.8 (CH2), 24.3 (CH3), 23.9 (CH2), 22.2 (CH2), 21.8 (CH3), 20.4 (CH3). HRMS: m/z calcd for C15H24ONa [M + Na]: 243.1725; found: 243.1733.
(1 S ,4 S ,5 R ,8 R ,9 S )-4-Allyl-9-isopropyl-1,5-dimethyl-bicyclo[6.3.0]undecan-3-one (21)
[α]D ²¹ +84.2 (c 2.9, CHCl3). IR (neat): νmax = 3078, 1694 (C=O), 1386, 1302, 992, 913 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3 + CCl4): δ = 5.64 (1 H, ddt, J = 17.7, 9.9, 7.5 Hz, CH=CH2), 4.95 (1 H, d, J = 17.7 Hz, CH=CH2), 4.93 (1 H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, CH=CH2), 2.46 (1 H, d, J = 11.2 Hz, H-2A), 2.54-2.35 (1 H, m), 2.24-1.76 (6 H, m), 1.76-1.22 (9 H, m), 1.01 (3 H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, s-CH3), 0.87 (3 H, s, t-CH3), 0.87
[3 H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, CH(CH 3)2], 0.79 [3 H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, CH(CH 3)2]. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3 + CCl4): δ = 214.8 (C, C=O), 135.8 (CH, CH=CH2), 116.3 (CH2, CH=CH2), 62.7 (CH, C-4), 53.0 (CH2, C-2), 47.4 (CH), 46.8 (CH), 44.8 (C, C-1), 42.6 (CH2), 35.8 (CH2), 34.6 (CH2), 31.2 (CH), 28.1 (CH), 24.4 (CH2), 24.2 (CH3), 22.5 (CH2), 21.6 (CH3), 19.9 (CH3), 19.8 (CH3). HRMS: m/z calcd for C19H32ONa [M + Na]: 299.2351; found: 299.2350.
(1 S ,7 S ,8 R ,11 R ,12 S )-12-Isopropyl-1,8-dimethyl-tricyclo[9.3.0.0 ³,7 ]tetradec-3-en-5-one (23a)
Mp 78-80 ˚C; [α]D ²² +3.28 (c 0.5, CHCl3). IR (neat): νmax = 1700 (C=O), 1606, 1388, 1342, 1277, 1239, 1187, 918 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.89 (1 H, s, C=CH), 2.75 (1 H, d, J = 12.6 Hz, H-2A), 2.66 (1 H, dd, J = 18.8, 6.3 Hz, H-6A), 2.39 (1 H, d, J = 12.6 Hz, H-2B), 2.45-2.38 (1 H, m), 2.08 (1 H, d, J = 18.8 Hz, H-6B), 2.05-1.25 (12 H, m), 1.05 (3 H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, s-CH3), 0.95 (3 H, s, t-CH3), 0.86 [3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, CH(CH 3)2], 0.83 [3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, CH(CH 3)2]. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 209.0 (C, C=O), 183.3 (C, C-3), 133.4 (CH, C-4), 53.5 (CH), 47.1 (CH), 44.5 (C), 44.3 (CH2), 44.1 (CH2), 42.0 (CH), 39.8 (CH), 39.5 (CH2), 31.5 (CH2), 28.3 (CH), 26.3 (CH2), 25.1 (CH3), 24.3 (CH3), 23.6 (CH2), 22.7 (CH3), 20.0 (CH3). HRMS: m/z calcd for C19H30ONa [M + Na]: 297.2194; found: 297.2198.
(1 S ,7 S ,8 R ,11 R ,12 S )-12-Isopropyl-1,4,8-trimethyl-tricyclo[9.3.0.0 ³,7 ]tetradec-3-en-5-one (28)
Mp 92-94 ˚C; [α]D ²² +14.83 (c 1.6, CHCl3). IR (KBr):
νmax = 1699 (C=O), 1376, 1347, 1326, 1156, 1083 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.87 (1 H, d, J = 13.0 Hz, H-2A), 2.63 (1 H, dd, J = 18.8, 6.2 Hz, H-6A), 2.31 (1 H, d,
J = 13.0 Hz, H-2B), 2.28-2.18 (1 H, m), 2.05 (1 H, dd, J = 18.8, 2.6 Hz, H-6B), 2.00-1.80 (2 H, m), 1.72 (3 H, s, olefinic CH3), 1.72-1.22 (10 H, m), 1.04 (3 H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, s-CH3), 0.97 (3 H, s, t-CH3), 0.85 [3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz CH(CH 3)2], 0.83 [3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, CH(CH 3)2]. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 209.2 (C, C=O), 174.5 (C, C-3), 139.4 (C, C-4), 52.6 (CH), 47.0 (CH), 46.1 (C), 42.9 (CH2), 42.7 (CH2), 42.4 (CH), 40.7 (CH2), 39.2 (CH), 31.8 (CH2), 28.2 (CH), 26.3 (CH2), 25.1 (CH3), 24.4 (CH3), 23.9 (CH2), 22.8 (CH3), 20.0 (CH3), 9.9 (CH3). HRMS: m/z calcd for C20H32ONa [M + Na]: 311.2351; found: 311.2352.
Crystal Data for Norhydroxynorfusicoauritone (23a)
X-ray data were collected at 110 K on a SMART CCD-BRUKER diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The structure was solved by direct methods (SIR 92). Refinement was by full-matrix least-squares procedures on F2 using SHELXL-97. The nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically whereas hydrogen atoms were refined isotropically. C19H30O; MW = 274.43; colorless; crystal system: monoclinic; space group P21; cell parameters, a = 10.383 (2) Å, b = 6.2198 (6) Å, c = 13.4758 (19) Å; β = 111.238 (19)˚, V = 811.2 (2) ų, Z = 2, D c = 1.124 g cm-³, F(000) = 304, µ = 0.067 mm-¹. Total number of l.s. parameters = 2853, R1 = 0.058 for 2290 I > 2σ(I) and 0.0762 for all data. wR2 = 0.126, GOF = 1.004, restrained GOF = 1.004 for all data. An ORTEP diagram is depicted in Figure  [²] . Crystallographic data has been deposited with Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC 838173).

11

Found to contain variable amount of the 1,3-transposed allylic secondary alcohol (similar to 27).