Endoscopy 2012; 44(04): 429-433
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291624
Case report/series
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of infected pancreatic fluid collections with placement of covered self-expanding metal stents: a case series

C. Fabbri
1   Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
,
C. Luigiano
1   Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
,
V. Cennamo
2   Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Italy
,
A. M. Polifemo
1   Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
,
L. Barresi
3   Endoscopy Unit, ISMETT/UPMC, Palermo, Italy
,
E. Jovine
4   Unit of General Surgery, AUSL Bologna Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
,
M. Traina
3   Endoscopy Unit, ISMETT/UPMC, Palermo, Italy
,
N. D’Imperio
1   Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
,
I. Tarantino
3   Endoscopy Unit, ISMETT/UPMC, Palermo, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 28 March 2011

accepted after revision 18 November 2011

Publication Date:
01 March 2012 (online)

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-GTD) has become the standard procedure for treating symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections. The aim of this series was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of covered self-expanding metal stent (CSEMS) placement for treating infected pancreatic fluid collections. From January 2007 to May 2010, 22 patients (18 M/4F; mean age 56.9) with infected pancreatic fluid collections (mean size, 13.2 cm) at two Italian centers were evaluated for EUS-GTD. In 20 of the 22 patients, EUS-GTD with CSEMS placement was indicated. Early complications occurred in two patients: one patient developed a superinfection, which was managed conservatively, and one experienced stent migration and superinfection, and was managed surgically. The CSEMSs were removed without difficulty in 18 patients after a median of 26 days, while stent removal failed in one patient due to inflammatory tissue ingrowth; instead it was removed during surgery performed for renal cancer. Clinical success was achieved without additional intervention in 17 patients during a mean follow-up of 610 days; only one symptomatic recurrence was observed. In our experience, EUS-GTD with CSEMS placement appears safe for the treatment of infected pancreatic fluid collections.

 
  • References

  • 1 Jacobson B, Baron T, Adler DG et al. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and the management of cystic lesions and inflammatory fluid collections of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 363-370
  • 2 Seewald S, Ang TL, Kida M et al. EUS 2008 working group document: evaluation of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 13-S21
  • 3 Talreja JP, Shami VM, Ku J et al. Transenteric drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections with fully covered self-expanding metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1199-1203
  • 4 Tarantino I, Barresi L, Fazio V et al. EUS-guided self-expandable stent placement in 1 step: a new method to treat pancreatic abscess. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1401-1403
  • 5 Tarantino I, Traina M, Barresi L et al. Transgastric plus transduodenal necrosectomy with temporary metal stents placement for treatment of large pancreatic necrosis. Pancreas 2010; 39: 269-270
  • 6 Belle S, Collet P, Post S et al. Temporary cystogastrostomy with self-expanding metallic stents for pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 493-495
  • 7 Chak A. Endosonographic-guided therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: S23-27
  • 8 Baron TH. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13: 743-764
  • 9 Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Conway MR et al. Comparison of EUS and conventional endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 355-359
  • 10 Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Rolland AL et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echoendoscope. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 473-477
  • 11 Cahen D, Rauws E, Fockens P et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: long-term outcome and procedural factors associated with safe and successful treatment. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 977-983
  • 12 Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali MA et al. Pancreatic fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 609-619
  • 13 Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE et al. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 7-17
  • 14 Harewood GC, Wright CA, Baron TH. Impact on patient outcomes of experience in the performance of endoscopic pancreatic fluid collection drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 230-235
  • 15 Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 635-643
  • 16 Seewald S, Thonke F, Ang TL et al. One-step, simultaneous double-wire technique facilitates pancreatic pseudocyst and abscess drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 805-808