Endoscopy 2012; 44(08): 767-771
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291703
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

MedJet – a new CO2-based disposable cleaning device allows safe and effective bowel cleansing during colonoscopy: a pilot study

R. Kiesslich
1   I. Med. Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany
,
N. Schuster
1   I. Med. Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany
,
A. Hoffman
1   I. Med. Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany
,
M. Goetz
1   I. Med. Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany
,
P. R. Galle
1   I. Med. Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany
,
E. Santo
2   Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
,
Z. Halpern
2   Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 21 March 2011

accepted after revision 15 January 2012

Publication Date:
21 March 2012 (online)

Background and study aims: Complete bowel cleansing is mandatory for effective colon cancer screening and surveillance. The aim of the current pilot study, which was conducted in humans, was to test the safety and efficiency of a newly developed disposable cleaning device, the MedJet, for intraprocedural bowel cleansing.

Patients and methods: Patients with screening or surveillance colonoscopy after previous polypectomy were included. The colonoscope was first inserted to the cecum and the overall cleansing was assessed according to the Ottawa scale. The MedJet device was used if colon cleansing had been incomplete. The MedJet catheter was passed over the working channel of the colonoscope and the colon was cleaned during withdrawal. The MedJet device delivered controlled jets comprising compressed CO2 and minimal amounts of sterile water, which allowed disintegration and removal of residual stool. The efficiency of cleaning was assessed according to the Boston scale.

Results: A total of 32 patients (16 female; mean age 61 years) were treated with the device. No device-related adverse or serious adverse events were noted. MedJet application during withdrawal provided effective and significant improvement in bowel cleansing (P = 0.005). Furthermore, 18 adenomas and 1 colon cancer, which were hidden behind stool remnants, could be identified in 11 patients following use of the MedJet device. However, the withdrawal times were prolonged (11.4±6.0 minutes) due to the additional cleaning procedure. All patients tolerated the procedure well.

Conclusions: The new MedJet device enabled highly effective and safe bowel cleansing during colonoscopy. The catheter-based system was easy to use and CO2 was applied for cleansing. The procedure was well tolerated by patients.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wallace MB, Kiesslich R. Advances in endoscopic imaging of colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2140-2150
  • 2 Macken E, Moreels T, Vannoote J et al. Quality assurance in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37: 10-15
  • 3 Schmiegel W, Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D et al. [Update S3-guideline “colorectal cancer” 2008]. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 799-840
  • 4 Geiger TM, Ricciardi R. Screening options and recommendations for colorectal cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009; 22: 209-217
  • 5 Belsey J, Epstein O, Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 25: 373-384
  • 6 Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 482-486 Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 326
  • 7 Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69 (03) 620-625
  • 8 Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 76-79
  • 9 Froelich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378-384
  • 10 Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S et al. Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 456-460
  • 11 Juriene I, Rigaux J, Deviere JM. S1420: a novel system for the improvement of colonic cleansing during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB157
  • 12 Moshkowitz M, Hirsch Y, Carmel I et al. A novel device for rapid cleaning of poorly prepared colons. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 834-836