Aktuelle Kardiologie 2012; 1(2): 133-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298468
Übersichtsarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aortenvitien – chirurgische Therapie

Surgical Treatment of Aortic Valve Disease
Hans-Joachim Schäfers
1   Klinik für Thorax- und Herz-Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
,
Thomas Walther
2   Kerckhoff Herzzentrum, Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Bad Nauheim
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 June 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Der Aortenklappenersatz (AKE) ist ein Standardeingriff mit geringem Letalitäts- und Morbiditätsrisiko. Zum Ersatz der Klappe werden traditionell mechanische Prothesen implantiert. In den letzten Jahren geht der Trend zu modernen Bioprothesen, die meist ab dem 60.–65. Lebensjahr eingesetzt werden. Die Eingriffe erfolgen standardisiert über eine komplette oder eine partielle Sternotomie. Im Langzeitverlauf spielen die klappenassoziierten Komplikationen eine relevante Rolle. Die Rekonstruktion der Aortenklappe ist dagegen mit wenigen Langzeitkomplikationen behaftet. Für ältere Patienten mit Nebenerkrankungen und somit erheblich erhöhtem Risiko stehen neuerdings minimalinvasive Verfahren durch kathetertechnische Aortenklappenimplantation (transfemoral oder transapikal) zur Verfügung. Daten zur Langzeithaltbarkeit der Implantate liegen noch nicht vor. Für die meisten Patienten bleibt die konventionelle Operation aufgrund der guten Ergebnisse die Therapie der Wahl.

Abstract

Current status: Aortic valve replacement has been the standard to treat aortic stenosis and regurgitation for decades. The same applies to aortic replacement in presence of aneurysm. The increasing number of elderly patients with relevant comorbidities has led to an increasing use of xenografts; in parallel aortic valve repair has been developed, and an increasing number of patients are treated by transcatheter techniques. Indications for surgery/intervention: Clear criteria exist for operation or intervention. Asymptomatic patients may require a critical assessment. Young patients with connective tissue disease may benefit from early prophylactic surgery. Choice of prosthesis: Mechanical prostheses appear ideal due to their durability, but require long-term anticoagulation and exhibit relevant valve-related complications. Biologic substitutes require only temporary anticoagulation and appear suitable for patients > 60 years. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: This approach is gaining importance for older patients with increased operative risk. Postinterventional mortality remains substantial at present, and due to some limitations including the rate of perivalvular leaks this approach should be reserved for high risk individuals. Sutureless valves: These new implants have not yet shown proven advantages over conventional prostheses. Ross-Operation: This procedure is increasingly applied in young patients without dilatation of the aortoventricular junction. Aortic valve repair: Repair has become an attractive alternative to replacement in aortic regurgitation. Thus anticoagulation can be avoided, and the risk of valve-related complications is low.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al. Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230-268
  • 2 Prasongsukarn K, Jamieson WR, Lichtenstein SV. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61–70 years. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14: 501-508
  • 3 Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the veterans affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1152-1158
  • 4 Toole JM, Stroud MR, Kratz JM et al. Twenty-five year experience with the St. Jude medical mechanical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1402-1409
  • 5 Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Al-Attar N et al. European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, European Society of Cardiology, European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1463-1470
  • 6 Kempfert J, Rastan A, Holzhey D et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation: analysis of risk factors and learning experience in 299 patients. Circulation 2011; 124: S124-S129
  • 7 Martens S, Sadowski J, Eckstein FS et al. Clinical experience with the ATS 3f Enable® Sutureless Bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40: 749-755
  • 8 El-Hamamsy I, Eryigit Z, Stevens LM et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 524-531
  • 9 Aicher D, Kunihara T, Abou Issa O et al. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 2011; 123: 178-185
  • 10 Aicher D, Fries R, Rodionycheva S et al. Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37: 127-132