Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(06): 439-444
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1301313
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Measurement Error in Estimates of Sprint Velocity from a Laser Displacement Measurement Device

N. E. Bezodis
1   St Mary’s University College, School of Sport, Health and Applied Science, London, United Kingdom
2   University of Bath, Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Bath, United Kingdom
,
A.I. T. Salo
2   University of Bath, Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Bath, United Kingdom
,
G. Trewartha
2   University of Bath, Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Bath, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 20 December 2011

Publication Date:
26 March 2012 (online)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the measurement error associated with estimates of velocity from a laser-based device during different phases of a maximal athletic sprint. Laser-based displacement data were obtained from 10 sprinters completing a total of 89 sprints and were fitted with a fifth-order polynomial function which was differentiated to obtain instantaneous velocity data. These velocity estimates were compared against criterion high-speed video velocities at either 1, 5, 10, 30 or 50 m using a Bland-Altman analysis to assess bias and random error. Bias was highest at 1 m (+ 0.41 m/s) and tended to decrease as the measurement distance increased, with values less than + 0.10 m/s at 30 and 50 m. Random error was more consistent between distances, and reached a minimum value (±0.11 m/s) at 10 m. Laser devices offer a potentially useful time-efficient tool for assessing between-subject or between-session performance from the mid-acceleration and maximum velocity phases (i. e., at 10 m and beyond), although only differences exceeding 0.22–0.30 m/s should be considered genuine. However, laser data should not be used during the first 5 m of a sprint, and are likely of limited use for assessing within-subject variation in performance during a single session.

 
  • References

  • 1 Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32: 307-317
  • 2 Arsac LM, Locatelli E. Modeling the energetics of 100-m running by using speed curves of world champions. J Appl Physiol 2002; 92: 1781-1788
  • 3 Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26: 217-238
  • 4 Berthoin S, Dupont G, Mary P, Gerbeaux M. Predicting sprint kinematic parameters from anaerobic field tests in physical education students. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15: 75-80
  • 5 Bezodis IN, Kerwin DG, Salo AIT. Lower-limb mechanics during the support phase of maximum-velocity sprint running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 707-715
  • 6 Bezodis NE, Salo AIT, Trewartha G. Choice of sprint start measure affects the performance-based ranking within a group of sprinters: which is the most appropriate measure?. Sports Biomech 2010; 9: 258-269
  • 7 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307-310
  • 8 Chelly SM, Denis C. Leg power and hopping stiffness: relationship with sprint running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 326-333
  • 9 Cheng L, Tan H, Kuntze G, Bezodis IN, Hailes S, Kerwin DG, Wilson A. A low-cost accurate speed-tracking system for supporting sprint coaching. Sports Eng Tech 2010; 224: 167-179
  • 10 de Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 1996; 29: 1223-1230
  • 11 Delecluse CH, van Coppenolle H, Willems E, Diels R, Goris M, van Leemputte M, Vuylsteke M. Analysis of 100 meter sprint performance as a multi-dimensional skill. J Hum Mov Stud 1995; 28: 87-101
  • 12 Gander RE, McClements JD, Sanderson LK, Rostad BA, Josephson KE, Pratt AJ. Sprint start instrumentation. IEEE Trans Instr Meas 1994; 43: 637-643
  • 13 Harrison AJ, Jensen RL, Donoghue O. A comparison of laser and video techniques for determining displacement and velocity during running. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2005; 9: 219-231
  • 14 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical standards in sport and exercise research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 15 Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Segment-interaction analysis of the stance limb in sprint running. J Biomech 2004; 37: 1439-1446
  • 16 Jacobs R, van Ingen Schenau GJ. Intermuscular coordination in a sprint push-off. J Biomech 1992; 25: 953-965
  • 17 Johnson MD, Buckley JG. Muscle power patterns in the mid-acceleration phase of sprinting. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 263-272
  • 18 Mero A, Komi PV. Reaction-time and electromyographic activity during a sprint start. Eur J Appl 1990; 61: 73-80
  • 19 Mero A, Luhtanen P, Komi PV. A biomechanical study of the sprint start. Scand J Sports Sci 1983; 5: 20-28
  • 20 Miller D, Nelson R. Biomechanics of Sport: A Research Approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1973
  • 21 Morin JB, Jeannin T, Chevallier B, Belli A. Spring-mass model characteristics during sprint running: correlation with performance and fatigue-induced changes. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 158-165
  • 22 Sale DG. Testing strength and power. In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ . (eds.). Physiological Testing of the High-Performance Athlete. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1991: 21-106
  • 23 Salo A, Bezodis I. Which starting style is faster in sprint running – standing or crouch start?. Sports Biomech 2004; 3: 43-54
  • 24 Slawinski J, Billat V, Koralsztein JP, Tavernier M. Use of lumbar point for the estimation of potential and kinetic mechanical power in running. J Appl Biomech 2004; 20: 324-331
  • 25 Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York: Wiley; 1990
  • 26 Yeadon MR, Kato T, Kerwin DG. Measuring running speed using photocells. J Sports Sci 1999; 17: 249-257