Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(12): 950-954
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311593
Physiology & Biochemistry
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Anatomy and Physiology of Hamstring Injury

T. Kumazaki
1   Department of Anatomy and Life Structure, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Y. Ehara
2   Department of Medical Education, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
T. Sakai
1   Department of Anatomy and Life Structure, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 29 February 2012

Publication Date:
15 August 2012 (online)

Abstract

The hamstring muscles were analyzed anatomically and physiologically to clarify the specific reasons for the incidence of muscle strain of the hamstrings. For the anatomical study, hamstring muscles of 13 embalmed cadavers were dissected. For the physiological study, the knee flexor torque and surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were measured during isometric contraction of hamstring muscles in 10 healthy adults. The biceps femoris muscle long head (BF-L) and semimembranosus muscle (SM) had hemi-pennate architecture and their fiber length per total muscle length (FL/TML) was smaller than that of semtendinosus muscle (ST) and biceps femoris muscle short head (BF-S) with other architecture. The decrease of total muscle length per fiber length (ΔTML/FL) was larger in BF-L and SM than in ST and BF-S. The EMG activities at 0° of knee angle were at maximal compared with other knee angles and were of similar level in BF-L, in SM and in ST, whereas they were considerably smaller in BF-S. The EMG at 0° of knee angle activity per physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) was about 1.6 times greater in BF-L than in SM. These results indicate the highest risk of muscle strain was in BF-L followed by SM.

 
  • References

  • 1 Agur AMR, Dalley AF. Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy. 12th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins/Wolters Kluwer Health; 2009: 383-389
  • 2 Arnason A, Andersen TE, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Prevention of hamstring strains in elite soccer: An intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2008; 18: 40-48
  • 3 Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T. Proximal hamstring strains of stretching type in different sports. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36: 1799-1804
  • 4 Cohen S, Bradley J. Acute proximal hamstring rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15: 350-355
  • 5 Delagi EF, Perotto A, Iazzetti J, Morrison D. Anatomic Guide For The Electromyographer. 2nd ed. Illinois: C Thomas Publisher; 1981: 170-187
  • 6 Friederich JA, Brand RA. Muscle fibers architecture of the human lower limb. J Biomechanics 1990; 23: 91-95
  • 7 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 8 Lieber RL. Skeletal muscle structure, function, and plasticity: The Physiological Basis of Rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010: 25-26
  • 9 Makihara Y, Nishino A, Fukubayashi T, Kanamori A. Decrease of knee flexion torque in patients with ACL reconstruction: Combined analysis of the architecture and function of the knee flexor muscles. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14: 310-317
  • 10 Mohamed O, Perry J, Hislop H. Relationship between wire EMG activity, muscle length, and torque of the hamstrings. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17: 569-579
  • 11 Okuwaki T. The causes and predicted remedies of pulled muscles. Sports Med 2007; 19: 6-14 (In Japanese)
  • 12 Okuwaki T. Muscle strains of top-level athletes in Japan. J Jpn Soc Clin Sports Med 2009; 17: 497-505 (In Japanese)
  • 13 Onishi H, Yagi R, Oyama M, Akasaka K, Ihashi K, Handa Y. EMG-angle relationship of the hamstring muscles during maximum knee flexion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2002; 12: 399-406
  • 14 Orchard JW. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for muscle strains in Australian football. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 300-303
  • 15 Petersen J, Holmich P. Evidence based prevention of hamstring injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 319-323
  • 16 Sallay I, Friedman L, Coogan G, Garrett E. Hamstring muscle injuries among water skiers. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 130-136
  • 17 Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th ed. Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2008: 293-294
  • 18 Tillmann B, Töndry G, Zilles K. Anatomie des Menschen: Lehrbuch und Atlas. Georg Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart: 1987: 543-544
  • 19 Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT, Spriggins AJ. Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective study with correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35: 435-439
  • 20 Ward SR, Eng CM, Smallwood LH, Lieber RL. Are current measurements of lower extremity muscle architecture accurate?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 1074-1082
  • 21 Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR. Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 179: 275-283
  • 22 Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ. Gray’s Anatomy. 38th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995: 875-876
  • 23 Woodley SJ, Mercer SR. Hamstring muscles: Architecture and innervation. Cells Tissues Organs 2005; 179: 125-141
  • 24 Woods C, Hawkins RD, Maltby S, Hulse M, Thomas A, Hodson A. The Football Association Medical Research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football – analysis of hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38: 36-41