A Grounded Theory Primer for Audiology

Abstract

Grounded theory is a widely used qualitative research methodology and has been used in a variety of disciplines including anthropology, medicine, nursing, and sociology. Although qualitative research methodologies, including grounded theory, have existed for some time, there is lack of attention to the rigorous use of qualitative methodology in the field of audiology. Today, three major schools of grounded theory are present in the literature. It is important for clinicians and researchers new to grounded theory research to be familiar with the different schools of grounded theory that can be implemented in research including the history and philosophy of each. Such an understanding will enable researchers and clinicians to critically appraise applications of grounded theory methodology and to understand its potential, perhaps for inclusion in their own research programs. This article will provide a brief history of grounded theory, define the three major schools of grounded theory and the philosophical and theoretical underpinnings of each, as well as discuss the use of grounded theory in audiology research.

Keywords

grounded theory - qualitative - audiology - constructivist - Glaserian - pragmatist

• References

• 1 Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction; 1967
• 2 Cutcliffe JR. Adapt or adopt: developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51: 421-428
• 3 Morse JM. Tussles, tensions, and resolutions. In: Morse JM, Stern PN, Corbin J, , et al, eds. Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009: 13-22
• 4 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-72
• 5 Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 42-45
• 6 Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2008
• 7 Bryant A, Charmaz K. Grounded theory in historical perspective: an epistemological account. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007: 32-57
• 8 Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London, UK: Sage; 2006
• 9 Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994: 105-117
• 10 Ponterotto JG. Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. J Counsel Psychol 2005; 52: 126-136
• 11 Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000: 509-535
• 12 Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1990
• 13 Strauss AL, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994: 273-285
• 14 Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998
• 15 Glaser BG. Doing formal theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007: 97-113
• 16 Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis: emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992
• 17 Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1969
• 18 Rennie DL. Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics. Theory Psychol 2000; 10: 481-502
• 19 Mills J, Bonner A, Francis K. The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2006; 5: 25-35
• 20 Charmaz K. Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005: 507-535
• 21 Seale C. The Quality of Qualitative Research. London, UK: Sage; 1999
• 22 Bryant A. Re-grounding grounded theory. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 2002; 4: 25-42
• 23 Clarke A. Situational analyses: grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interact 2003; 26: 553-576
• 24 Glaser BG, Holton J. Remodeling grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review 2004; 4: 1-24
• 25 Neill SJ. Grounded theory sampling. J Res Nurs 2006; 11: 253-
• 26 Glaser BG. Constructivist grounded theory?. Forum Qual Soc Res 2002; 3
• 27 Morse J. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 147-149
• 28 Dey I. Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1999
• 29 Hood JC. Orthodoxy vs. power: the defining traits of grounded theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007
• 30 Schwandt TA. The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007
• 31 Ng S, Bartlett D, Lucy SD. Reflection as a window to student development: insight for faculty, preceptors, and mentors. Semin Hear 2012; 33: 147-162
• 32 Gagne JP, Hétu B, Getty L. Towards the development of paradigms to conduct functional evaluative research in audiological rehabilitation. J Acad Reh 1995; 28: 7-25
• 33 Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C. Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract 1996; 2: 171-179
• 34 Finlay L. “Going exploring”: the nature of qualitative research. In: Finlay L, Ballinger, eds. Qualitative Research for Allied Health Professionals: Challenging Choices. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2006: 3-8
• 35 Crukley J, Dundas JA, McCreery R, Meston C, Ng S. Re-envisioning collaboration, hierarchy, and transparency in audiology education, practice, and research. Semin Hear 2012; 33: 196-206
• 36 Charmaz K. Grounded theory. In: Hesse-Biber S, Leavy P, eds. Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004: 496-521
• 37 Palmer C. Evidence based decision making in hearing instrument selection, fitting, and outcomes. In: Proceedings of Hearing Care for Adults: An International Conference. Chicago, IL: Phonak, Inc.; 2006
• 38 Moodie S, Johnson A, Scollie S. Evidence-based practice and Canadian audiology. Canadian Hearing Report 2008; 3: 12-14
• 39 Cox RM. Evidence-based practice in audiology. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 408-409
• 40 Kearney MH. Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. Res Nurs Health 2001; 24: 145-153
• 41 Stern PN. Grounded theory methodology: its uses and processes. Image (IN) 1980; 12: 20-23
• 42 Crotty M. The Foundations of Social Research. London, UK: Sage; 1998
• 43 Plano-Clark VL, Creswell JW. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 2007
• 44 Mills J, Chapman Y, Bonner A, Francis K. Grounded theory: a methodological spiral from positivism to postmodernism. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007; 58: 72-79