Decreased Rate of CSF Leakage Associated with Complete Reconstruction of Suboccipital Cranial Defects

Abstract

Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage represents a major source of morbidity following microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery. The objective of this study was to retrospectively assess whether complete versus incomplete reconstruction of the suboccipital cranial defect influences the incidence of CSF leakage following MVD.

Methods We reviewed the charts of 100 patients who consecutively underwent MVD for trigeminal neuralgia by two attending neurosurgeons between July 2004 and April 2010. Operative variables including incomplete or complete calvarial reconstruction, primary dural closure or dural closure with adjunct, and use of lumbar drainage were recorded. The effect of complete calvarial reconstruction on the incidence of postoperative CSF leakage was examined using a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results Of the 36 patients whose wound closure was reconstructed with a complete cranioplasty, 2 (5.6%) patients experienced a postoperative CSF leak. Of the 64 patients whose wound closure was augmented with an incomplete cranioplasty, 15 (23.4%) experienced a postoperative CSF leak. There was suggestive but inconclusive evidence that the risk of CSF leakage following MVD was smaller with complete reconstruction of calvarial defect than with incomplete reconstruction (two-sided p value = 0.059), after accounting for age, dural closure method, use of lumbar drainage, and previous MVD.

Conclusion Complete reconstruction of the suboccipital cranial defect decreases the risk of CSF leakage.

Keywords

cerebrospinal fluid leak - pseudomeningocele - suboccipital - craniectomy - microvascular decompression

• References

• 1 Elias WJ, Burchiel KJ. Microvascular decompression. Clin J Pain 2002; 18 (1) 35-41
• 2 Barker II FG, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Shields PT, Larkins MV, Jho HD. Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 1995; 82 (2) 201-210
• 3 Barker II FG, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Larkins MV, Jho HD. The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 1996; 334 (17) 1077-1083
• 4 Jödicke A, Winking M, Deinsberger W, Böker DK. Microvascular decompression as treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly patient. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1999; 42 (2) 92-96
• 5 Broggi G, Ferroli P, Franzini A, Servello D, Dones I. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: comments on a series of 250 cases, including 10 patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68 (1) 59-64
• 6 Linskey ME, Ratanatharathorn V, Peñagaricano J. A prospective cohort study of microvascular decompression and Gamma Knife surgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (Suppl) 160-172
• 7 Jellish WS, Benedict W, Owen K, Anderson D, Fluder E, Shea JF. Perioperative and long-term operative outcomes after surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: microvascular decompression vs percutaneous balloon ablation. Head Face Med 2008; 4: 11
• 8 Dubey A, Sung WS, Shaya M , et al. Complications of posterior cranial fossa surgery—an institutional experience of 500 patients. Surg Neurol 2009; 72 (4) 369-375
• 9 Møller AR, Jannetta PJ. Monitoring facial EMG responses during microvascular decompression operations for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 1987; 66 (5) 681-685
• 10 Hitotsumatsu T, Matsushima T, Inoue T. Microvascular decompression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: three surgical approach variations: technical note. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (6) 1436-1441 , discussion 1442–1443
• 11 Sindou MP. Microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm. Importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147 (10) 1019-1026 , discussion 1026
• 12 R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.01.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. . Available at: http://www.r-project.org
• 13 Grotenhuis JA. Costs of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage: 1-year, retrospective analysis of 412 consecutive nontrauma cases. Surg Neurol 2005; 64 (6) 490-493 , discussion 493–494
• 14 Babuccu O, Kalayci M, Peksoy I, Kargi E, Cagavi F, Numanoğlu G. Effect of cerebrospinal fluid leakage on wound healing in flap surgery: histological evaluation. Pediatr Neurosurg 2004; 40 (3) 101-106
• 15 Li N, Zhao WG, Pu CH, Shen JK. Clinical application of artificial dura mater to avoid cerebrospinal fluid leaks after microvascular decompression surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005; 48 (6) 369-372
• 16 Park JS, Kong DS, Lee JA, Park K. Intraoperative management to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leakage after microvascular decompression: dural closure with a “plugging muscle” method. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30 (2) 139-142 , discussion 142
• 17 Than KD, Baird CJ, Olivi A. Polyethylene glycol hydrogel dural sealant may reduce incisional cerebrospinal fluid leak after posterior fossa surgery. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (1, Suppl 1) ONS182-ONS186 , discussion ONS186–ONS187
• 18 Black P. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks following spinal or posterior fossa surgery: use of fat grafts for prevention and repair. Neurosurg Focus 2000; 9 (1) e4
• 19 Steinbok P, Singhal A, Mills J, Cochrane DD, Price AV. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and pseudomeningocele formation after posterior fossa tumor resection in children: a retrospective analysis. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23 (2) 171-174 , discussion 175
• 20 Kabuto M, Kubota T, Kobayashi H, Handa Y, Tuchida A, Takeuchi H. MR imaging of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea following the suboccipital approach to the cerebellopontine angle and the internal auditory canal: report of the two cases. Surg Neurol 1996; 45 (4) 336-340
• 21 Leng LZ, Brown S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. “Gasket seal” watertight closure in minimal access endoscopic skull base surgery. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (5 Suppl) ONSE342-ONSE343
• 22 Silverman DA, Hughes GB, Kinney SE, Lee JH. Technical modifications of suboccipital craniectomy for prevention of postoperative headache. Skull Base 2004; 14 (2) 77-84