Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2012; 22(04): 189-194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314864
Wissenschaft und Forschung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effect of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation over the Stellate Ganglion: A Placebo-Controlled Double Blind Study in Healthy Subjects

Effekt der transkutanen elektrischen Nervenstimulation über dem Ganglion stellatum: eine placebokontrollierte Doppelblindstudie an gesunden Probanden
O. Schuhfried
1   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
,
M. Herceg
1   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
,
G. Vacariu
2   Department of Physical Medicine, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 02 April 2012

accepted 14 May 2012

Publication Date:
22 August 2012 (online)

Abstract

Abstract Purpose:

Does transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) over the stellate ganglion influence the function of the autonomic nervous system?

Materials and Methods:

12 healthy subjects (6 female, 6 male) received according to a randomization list (cross-over design) either conventional TENS therapy (100 Hz biphasic) or a placebo application (device switched on, but current intensity zero) over the stellate ganglion of the non-dominant side for 20 min on 2 different days. Before and after the interventions the pain threshold was determined by pressure algometry on the forearm. Skin temperature was recorded by infrared thermography in the dorsum of the hand and the distal phalanx of the middle finger of the treated arm before and immediately after 20 min of intervention. After this, alterations of skin temperature were measured 1 min as well as 5 min after a Valsalva like manoeuvre. At the same time points the heart rate was measured using a pulse recorder.

Results:

After the intervention temperature assessment in the dorsum of the hand showed higher values (given as differences compared to baseline values before the intervention) with TENS treatment than with placebo treatment at all time points of measurement. For temperature values in the dorsum of the hand repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant effect both between the interventions (p=0.046) and over time (p<0.0001). For the temperature assessment in the distal phalanx of the middle finger no significant effect between the 2 interventions was found. Furthermore there were no statistically significant differences with regard to the measurement of the pain threshold and the heart rate data (given as differences compared to baseline values before the intervention).

Conclusions:

Conventional TENS application over the stellate ganglion leads to a significantly higher skin temperature in the dorsum of the hand as compared to placebo application in healthy humans. This suggests that this therapeutic application may inhibit sympathetic outflow from the stellate ganglion.

Zusammenfassung

Fragestellung:

Beeinflusst eine transkutane elektrische Nervenstimulation (TENS) über dem Ganglion stellatum die Funktionen des autonomen Nervensystems?

Material und Methode:

12 gesunde Probanden (6w, 6 m) erhielten entsprechend einer Randomisierungsliste an 2 unterschiedlichen Tagen für 20 min entweder konventionelle TENS (100 Hz biphasisch) oder eine Placebo-Anwendung (eingeschaltetes Gerät, aber Intensität auf 0) über dem Ganglion stellatum der nicht dominanten Seite. Vor und nach den Interventionen wurde die Schmerzschwelle mittels Druckalgometer am Unterarm bestimmt. Mittels Infrarotthermogra­fie erfolgte eine Aufzeichnung der Hauttempe­ratur im Bereich des Handrückens und der distalen Phalanx des Mittelfingers des behandelten Arms vor und unmittelbar nach 20 min Intervention. Danach wurde die Veränderung der Hauttemperatur nach 1 min und 5 min nach einem Valsalva-Manöver gemessen. Zu den selben Zeitpunkten wurde die Herzfrequenz mittels Pulsabnahmegerät gemessen.

Ergebnisse:

Es konnte zu allen postinterventionellen Messzeitpunkten eine höhere Hauttemperatur am Handrücken (dargestellt als Differenz zur Ausgangsmessung vor der Intervention) im Vergleich zu Placebo gemessen werden. Für die Temperaturmessungen am Handrücken zeigte sich in der Varianzanalyse mit Messwiederholungen ein signifikanter Unterschied sowohl zwischen den Interventionen (p=0,046) als auch im zeitlichen Verlauf (p<0,0001). Die Temperaturmessungen der distalen Phalanx des Mittelfingers zeigten keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den Interventionen. Für die Schmerzschwellenmessung und Pulswerte (dargestellt als Differenz zur Ausgangsmessung vor der Intervention) zeigten sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede.

Schlussfolgerung:

Die konventionelle TENS-Applikation über dem Ganglion stellatum führt bei gesunden Probanden im Bereich des Handrückens im Vergleich zur Plazebo-Anwendung zu einer signifikant höheren Hauttemperatur. Das gibt Hinweis auf einen hemmenden Effekt dieser Therapieform auf die sympathische Aktivität des Ganglion stellatum.

 
  • References

  • 1 Basford JR. Electrical Therapy. In: Krusen S. ed Handbook of Physical Medicine and Rehabiliation. WB Saunders Company; 1990: 375-379
  • 2 Marchand S, Charest J, Li J et al. Is TENS purely a placebo effect? A controlled study on chronic low back pain. Pain 1993; 54: 99-106
  • 3 Walsh DM. TENS. Clinical applications and related theory. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1997
  • 4 Robertson V, Ward A, Low J et al. Electrotherapy explained: principles and practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006
  • 5 Johnson M, Martinson M. Efficacy of electrical nerve stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain 2007; 130 (1) (2) 157-165
  • 6 Nnoaham KE, Kumbang J. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Jul 16 2008; (03) CD003222
  • 7 Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Oct 8 2008; (04) CD003008
  • 8 Walsh DM, Howe TE, Johnson MI et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Apr 15 2009; (02) CD006142
  • 9 Kroeling P, Gross A, Goldsmith CH et al. Electrotherapy for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Oct 7 2009; (04) CD004251
  • 10 Jenkner FL. Electric blockade of sympathic and somatic nerves through the skin. Wien Klin Wsch 1980; 92: 233-240
  • 11 Hage R, Weilguni S, Gutwein T et al. Transkutane Elektrotherapie über dem Ganglion stellatum bei Schmerzkranken: Untersuchung mit der Laser-Dopplertechnik. Schmerz 1993; 7 (Suppl. 01) S48
  • 12 Larsen B, Macher F, Bolte R et al. Stellate ganglion block with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS): a double-blind study with healthy probands. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1995; 30: 155-162
  • 13 Korner PI, Tonkin AM, Uther JB. Reflex and mechanical circulatory effects of graded Valsalva maneuvers in normal man. J Appl Physiol 1976; 40: 434-440
  • 14 Clark S, Dunn G, Moore T et al. Comparison of thermography and laser Doppler imaging in the assessment of Raynauds phenomenon. Microvasc Res 2003; 66: 73-76
  • 15 Berliner MN. Reduced skin hyperemia during tap water iontophoresis after intake of acetylsalicyl acid. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 482-487
  • 16 Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1995; 150: 971-978
  • 17 Ignelzi RJ, Nyquist JK.. Excitability changes in peripheral nerve fibers after repetitive electrical stimulation. J Neurosurg 1979; 51: 824-833
  • 18 Bowsher D. Modulation of nociceptive input. In: Wells PE, Frampton V, Bowsher D. eds. Pain management by physiotherapy. 2nd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1994: 54-58
  • 19 Sjölund B, Terenius L, Eriksson M. Increased cerebrospinal fluid levels of endorphins after electro-acupuncture. Acta Physiol Scan 1977; 100: 382-384
  • 20 Han JS, Chen XH, Sun SL et al. Effect of low-and high-frequency TENS on Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe and dynorphin A immunreactivity in human lumbar CSF. Pain 1991; 47: 295-298
  • 21 Sluka KA, Deacon M, Stibal A et al. Spinal blockade of opioid receptors prevents the analgesia produced by TENS in arthritic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999; 289: 840-846
  • 22 Kalra A, Urban MO, Sluka KA. Blockade of opioid receptors in rostral ventral medulla prevents antihyperalgesia produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001; 298: 257-263
  • 23 Winsor T, Bendezn J. Thermography and the peripheral circulation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1964; 121: 136-156
  • 24 Hardy PA, Wells JC. Extent of sympathetic blockade after stellate ganglion block with bupivacaine. Pain 1989; 36 (02) 193-196
  • 25 Nilsson G, Lindblom P, Palmer B et al. The effect of triglycyl-lysine vasopressin on skin blood flow, measured with laser Doppler flowmetry, thermography & plethysmography. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1987; 21 (02) 149-157
  • 26 Chen CC, Johnson MI. An investigation into the effects of frequency-modulated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on experimentally-induced pressure pain in healthy human participants. J Pain 2009; 10 (10) 1029-1037
  • 27 Owens S, Atkinson ER, Lees DE. Thermographic evidence of reduced sympathetic tone with transcutaneous nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology 1979; 50: 62-65
  • 28 Stilz RJ, Carron H, Sanders DB. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in a 6-year-old: Successful treatment by transcutaneous nerve stimulation. Anesth Analg (Cleve) 1997; 56: 438-443
  • 29 Abram SE. Increased sympathetic tone associated with transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Anesthesiology 1976; 45: 575-577
  • 30 Ebersold MJ, Laws ER, Albers JW. Measurements of autonomic function before, during and after transcutaneous stimulation in patients with chronic pain in control subjects. Mayo Clin Proc 1977; 52: 228-232
  • 31 Reeves II JL, Graff-Radford SB, Shipman D. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on experimental pain and sympathetic nervous system response. Pain Medicine 2004; 5 (02) 150-161
  • 32 Hollman JE, Morgan BJ. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the pressor response to static handgrip exercise. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 28-36
  • 33 Scudds RJ, Helewa A, Scudds RA. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on skin temperature in asymptomatic subjects. Phys Ther 1995; 68: 621-628
  • 34 Cramp FL, McCullough Lowe AS. et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: The effect of intensity upon local and distal cutaneous blood flow and skin temperature in healthy subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 5-9
  • 35 Olyaei GR, Talebian S, Hadian MR et al. The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sympathetic skin response. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 44: 23-28
  • 36 Stein C, Dal Lago P, Barcellos Ferreira J et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at different frequencies on heart rate variability in healthy subjects. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 2011; 165: 205-208
  • 37 Bruehl S. An update on the pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 713-725