Real-Time Imaging with the O-Arm for Skull Base Applications: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study

Abstract

Introduction Although intraoperative imaging/navigation has established its critical role in neurosurgery, its role in cranial base surgery is currently limited. Due to issues such as poor bony resolution and accuracy, surgeons have to rely on anatomic landmarks that can be distorted by pathology when drilling out critical structures. Though originally developed for spinal application, we hypothesized that the O-Arm could address the above issues for use in cranial base procedures.

Methods A cadaveric study was performed in which heads underwent a preprocedure scan via the O-Arm, a fluoroscopic device capable of providing three-dimensional images through the use of cone-beam technology. Preprocedure scans were taken and then registered to a Stealth S7 machine (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Key cranial base landmarks were identified on these scans and then subsequently identified under direct visualization after (1) endoscopic endonasal dissection and (2) a middle fossa approach. We then quantified the difference in distance between the preplanned and identified structure during surgery. This difference was considered the error.

Results For anterior cranial fossa structures, the mean error was 0.25 mm (anterior septum), 0.27 mm (left septum), and 0.32 mm (right septum). For middle fossa structures, the errors were: 0.11 mm (foramen spinosum), 0.44 mm (foramen rotundum), and 0.21 mm (foramen ovale).

Conclusion Based on this preliminary cadaveric study, we feel the O-Arm can provide the necessary imaging resolution at the skull base to be employed for intraoperative navigation during cranial base approaches (open and endoscopic). This study warrants further investigation into its clinical use in patients undergoing similar surgical procedures.

Keywords

intraoperative navigation - O-Arm - skull base

• References

• 1 Ammirati M, Ma J, Cheatham ML, Maxwell D, Bloch J, Becker DP. Drilling the posterior wall of the petrous pyramid: a microneurosurgical anatomical study. J Neurosurg 1993; 78: 452-455
• 2 Rowed DW, Nedzelski JM. Hearing preservation in the removal of intracanalicular acoustic neuromas via the retrosigmoid approach. J Neurosurg 1997; 86: 456-461
• 3 Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Shetty AP. Intra-operative Iso-C3D navigation for pedicle screw instrumentation of hangman's fracture: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007; 15: 73-77
• 4 Euler E, Heining S, Riquarts C, Mutschler W. C-arm-based three-dimensional navigation: a preliminary feasibility study. Comput Aided Surg 2003; 8: 35-41
• 5 Sugimoto Y, Ito Y, Tomioka M , et al. Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy (IsoC-3D)-assisted upper thoracic pedicle screw insertion. Acta Med Okayama 2010; 64: 209-212
• 6 Ito Y, Sugimoto Y, Tomioka M, Hasegawa Y, Nakago K, Yagata Y. Clinical accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9: 450-453
• 7 Park P, Foley KT, Cowan JA, Marca FL. Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation utilizing O-arm fluoroscopy with computer-assisted navigation: Feasibility, technique, and preliminary results. Surg Neurol Int 2010; 1: 44
• 8 Kim JS, Eun SS, Prada N, Choi G, Lee SH. Modified transcorporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy assisted by O-arm-based navigation: a technical case report. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (Suppl. 02) S147-S152
• 9 Schils F. O-arm(R) guided balloon kyphoplasty: prospective monocenter case series of 54 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2011; 68: 250-256
• 10 Schils F. O-arm guided balloon kyphoplasty: preliminary experience of 16 consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2011; 109: 175-178
• 11 Caire F, Gantois C, Torny F, Ranoux D, Maubon A, Moreau JJ. Intraoperative use of the Medtronic O-arm for deep brain stimulation procedures. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2010; 88: 109-114
• 12 Labadie RF, Davis BM, Fitzpatrick JM. Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 13: 27-31
• 13 Bartling SH, Leinung M, Graute J , et al. Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 129-134
• 14 Samii A, Brinker T, Kaminsky J, Lanksch WR, Samii M. Navigation-guided opening of the internal auditory canal via the retrosigmoid route for acoustic neuroma surgery: cadaveric, radiological, and preliminary clinical study. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 382-387 , discussion 388
• 15 Mascott CR, Sol JC, Bousquet P, Lagarrigue J, Lazorthes Y, Lauwers-Cances V. Quantification of true in vivo (application) accuracy in cranial image-guided surgery: influence of mode of patient registration. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1, Suppl 1) ONS146-ONS156 , discussion ONS146–ONS156
• 16 Steinmeier R, Rachinger J, Kaus M, Ganslandt O, Huk W, Fahlbusch R. Factors influencing the application accuracy of neuronavigation systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2000; 75: 188-202
• 17 Pillai P, Sammet S, Ammirati M. Application accuracy of computed tomography-based, image-guided navigation of temporal bone. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (4, Suppl 2) 326-332 , discussion 332–333