Ultraschall Med 2013; 34(3): 214-237
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325510
Fort- und Weiterbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Spezielle echokardiografische Diagnostik und besondere Problemkonstellationen bei Patienten mit degenerativer Aortenklappenstenose

A. Hagendorff
1   Division of Cardiology and Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology, University Hospital Leipzig
,
S. Stöbe
1   Division of Cardiology and Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology, University Hospital Leipzig
,
A. Tarr
2   2nd Department of Medicine and Cardiology Centre, Medical Faculty, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged
,
D. Pfeiffer
1   Division of Cardiology and Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology, University Hospital Leipzig
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 May 2012

01 September 2012

Publication Date:
10 December 2012 (online)

Lernziele

Trotz exakter Durchführung einer transthorakalen echokardiografischen Untersuchung bleiben häufig die Einschätzung des Schweregrads des Vitiums und die Entscheidungsfindung – von dem Befund abhängige therapeutische Konsequenzen zu treffen – schwierig. Durch den Inhalt der vorliegenden Arbeit sollen dem Leser zusätzliche, neben der konventionellen Echokardiografie bestehende, Möglichkeiten der echokardiografischen Diagnostik bei Patienten mit degenerativer Aortenstenose vorgestellt werden. Dazu gehören nicht nur die transösophageale Echokardiografie und die Stressechokardiografie, sondern auch die moderne Applikationen des Deformationsimagings. Zusätzlich werden Problemkonstellationen und Fehlermöglichkeiten bei der echokardiografischen Diagnostik der Aortenstenose erläutert.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2009; 10: 1-25
  • 2 Hagendorff A. Die konventionelle Standarduntersuchung in der transthorakalen Echokardiographie bei Patienten mit degenerativer Aortenklappenstenose. Ultraschall in Med in press.
  • 3 Otto CM. Valvular aortic stenosis – Disease severity and timing of intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 2141-2151
  • 4 Fijalkowski M, Koprowski A, Galaska R et al. Improvement of ultrasonic myocardial properties after aortic valve replacement for pure severe aortic stenosis: the predictive value of ultrasonic tissue characterization for left ventricle reverse remodeling. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23: 1060-1066
  • 5 Lee SP, Kim YJ, Kim JH et al. Deterioration of myocardial function in paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis: two-dimensional strain analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 976-983
  • 6 Donal E, Thebault C, O’Connor K et al. Impact of aortic stenosis on longitudinal myocardial deformation during exercise. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 235-241
  • 7 Hyodo E, Arai K, Koczo A et al. Alteration in subendocardial and subepicardial Myocardial Strain in patients with aortic valve stenosis: An early marker of left ventricular dysfunction?. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25: 153-159
  • 8 Weidemann F, Niemann M, Herrmann S et al. A new echocardiographic approach for the detection of non-ischaemic fibrosis in hypertrophic myocardium. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 3020-3026
  • 9 Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Störk S et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2009; 120: 577-584
  • 10 Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 165-193
  • 11 Tsang TS. Echocardiography in cardiovascular public health: the Feigenbaum Lecture 2008. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 649-656
  • 12 Blume GG, Mcleod CJ, Barnes ME et al. Left atrial function: physiology, assessment, and clinical implications. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 421-430
  • 13 O’Connor K, Magne J, Rosca M et al. Left atrial function and remodeling in aortic stenosis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 299-305
  • 14 Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M et al. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 2005; 112: 377-382
  • 15 Evangelista A. Echocardiography in aortic disease: EAE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur Heart J; 2010 Bd. 11. 645-658
  • 16 Lancellotti P. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 1: aortic and pulmonary regurgitation (native valve disease). European Journal of Echocardiography; 2010 Bd. 11. 223-244
  • 17 Shanewise JS, Cheung AT, Aronson S et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for intraoperative echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for certification in perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 870-884
  • 18 Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2012; 13: 1-46
  • 19 Donal E, Novaro GM, Deserrano D et al. Planimetric assessment of anatomic valve area overestimates effective orifice area in bicuspid aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1392-1398
  • 20 Roberts WC. Aortic dissection: anatomy, consequences, and causes. Amercian Heart Journal 1981; 101: 195-214
  • 21 Larson EW, Edwards WD. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 849-855
  • 22 Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J et al. “Overestimation” of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 655-661
  • 23 Takeda S, Rimington H, Chambers J. The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. Heart 1999; 82: 11-14
  • 24 Koch CG, Khandwala F, Estafanous FG et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2005; 111: 3221-3229
  • 25 Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003; 108: 983-988
  • 26 Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart 2010; 96: 1364-1371
  • 27 Briand M, Dumesnil JG, Kadem L et al. Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 291-298
  • 28 Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-flow, low-gradient, normal ejection fraction aortic stenosis. Curr Cardiol Rep 2010; 12: 108-115
  • 29 Monin J, Monchi M, Gest V et al. Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients. Risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 2101-2107
  • 30 Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis. Operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 2003; 108: 319-234
  • 31 Jander N, Minners J, Holme I et al. Outcome of patients with low gradient “severe” aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2011; 123: 887-895
  • 32 Unger P, Dedobbeleer C, van Camp G et al. Mitral regurgitation in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement. Heart 2010; 96: 9-14