Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75(02): 079-083
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327443
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Middle-Term Surgical Outcomes of Microscopic Posterior Decompression for Far-Out Syndrome

Manabu Sasaki
1   Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Iseikai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
2   Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Yukioka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
,
Masanori Aoki
2   Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Yukioka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
,
Katsumi Matsumoto
1   Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Iseikai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
,
Koichiro Tsuruzono
1   Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Iseikai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
,
Chihiro Akiyama
2   Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Yukioka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
,
Toshiki Yoshimine
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 February 2012

01 July 2012

Publication Date:
05 October 2012 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Far-out syndrome (FOS) is a rare incident caused by L5 nerve root entrapment in the far-out area, the L5–S1extraforaminal area between the transverse process and the sacral ala. The purpose of this study is to disclose the middle-term surgical outcomes of microscopic posterior decompression in the far-out area (MPDFA).

Material and Methods From June 2008 to November 2010, eight patients with FOS (six men and two women, mean age 65.4 years) were treated with MPDFA. Their chief complaint was leg pain in the L5 nerve root distribution area. Nerve root impingements in the far-out area were confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and selective radiculography. Indications for MPDFA were given when pain was uncontrollable with conservative treatments for more than 1 month. MPDFA was performed according to the following procedure: a 4-to-5–cm skin incision was made just above the far-out area. The far-out area was exposed using Wiltse's intermuscular approach. The nerve root was decompressed with partial resection of the transverse process and the sacral ala, and removal of the iliolumbar ligament. Surgical outcomes were evaluated at periodical examinations with the Japanese Orthopedic Score (JOA) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the leg pain. The mean follow-up period was 24.3 months (ranging from 12 to 40 months).

Results All patients had reduced radicular leg pain after their operations. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.4 days, and the patients returned to their normal activities of daily living immediately after discharge. Both JOA and the VAS scores improved after surgery. The scores temporarily worsened in two patients with degenerative scoliosis; the worsening was attributed not to recurrence of the radiculopathy but to pain arising from knee arthropathy. The scores were maintained in the other patients at least until the final examinations during the follow-up.

Conclusion MPDFA is a less-invasive surgery for treating FOS and can provide a good middle-term surgical outcome.

Keywords

microscopic posterior decompression - far-out syndrome - L5 radiculopathy - intermuscular approach - extraforaminal stenosis
 

  • References

  • 1 Wiltse LL, Guyer RD, Spencer CW, Glenn WV, Porter IS. Alar transverse process impingement of the L5 spinal nerve: the far-out syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984; 9: 31-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nathan H, Weizenbluth M, Halperin N. The lumbosacral ligament (LSL), with special emphasis on the “lumbosacral tunnel” and the entrapment of the 5th lumbar nerve. Int Orthop 1982; 6: 197-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Nojiri K, Ishikawa M, Toyama Y, Nishikawa Y. Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine: anatomic study and a report of four cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: E169-E173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kitamura M, Eguchi Y, Inoue G , et al. A case of symptomatic extra-foraminal lumbosacral stenosis (“far-out syndrome”) diagnosed by diffusion tensor imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: E854-E857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kim K, Isu T, Matsumoto R, Miyamoto M, Isobe M. [A case of far-out syndrome: case report and review of the literature]. No Shinkei Geka 2006; 34: 313-317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Park YK, Kim JH, Chung HS, Suh JK. Microsurgical midline approach for the decompression of extraforaminal stenosis in L5-S1. J Neurosurg 2003; 98 (3, Suppl): 264-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wiltse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13: 696-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sasaki M, Morris S, Goto T, Iwatsuki K, Yoshimine T. Spray-irrigation system attached to high-speed drills for simultaneous prevention of local heating and preservation of a clear operative field in spinal surgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010; 50: 900-904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Ishii K , et al. Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 72-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kunogi J, Hasue M. Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991; 16: 1312-1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sasso RC, Macadaeg K, Nordmann D, Smith M. Selective nerve root injections can predict surgical outcome for lumbar and cervical radiculopathy: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18: 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar