J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75(04): 267-269
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331383
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Endonasal Transphenoidal Surgery Using the BrainLAB® Headband for Navigation Without Rigid Fixation

Sara G. Duque
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
,
Ramana Gorrepati
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
,
Kartik Kesavabhotla
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
,
Clark Huang
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
,
John A. Boockvar
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 February 2012

02 July 2012

Publication Date:
19 March 2013 (online)

Abstract

The number of lesions of the skull base currently resected via endoscopic, endonasal, transphenoidal approach has increased. We have successfully treated 63 consecutive patients with pituitary lesions using this technique in combination with BrainLAB reference headband and laser surface scanning (BrainLAB®, Heimstetten, Germany) for surgical navigation. This technique affords several advantages over neuronavigation based on adhesive-mounted fiducial registration. Rigid fixation in a Mayfield clamp is not required, which allows for flexibility with respect to positioning of the head during the procedure. This is particularly important, as extension and flexion of the head provide greater exposure to the clivus and anterior skull base, respectively. Also, we demonstrate that this technique is safe, easy-to-use, and faster compared with other ones.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gendeh BS, Doi M, Selladurai BM, Khalid BA, Jegan T, Misiran K. The role of endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary tumours: HUKM experience. Med J Malaysia 2006; 61: 343-348
  • 2 Koc K, Anik I, Ozdamar D, Cabuk B, Keskin G, Ceylan S. The learning curve in endoscopic pituitary surgery and our experience. Neurosurg Rev 2006; 29: 298-305 , discussion 305
  • 3 Snyderman C, Zimmer LA, Kassam A. Sources of registration error with image guidance systems during endoscopic anterior cranial base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131: 145-149
  • 4 Snyderman CH, Kassam AB. Endoscopic techniques for pathology of the anterior cranial fossa and ventral skull base. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 563
  • 5 Schwartz TH, Stieg PE, Anand VK. Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (1, Suppl) ONS44-ONS51 , discussion ONS44–ONS51
  • 6 Raabe A, Krishnan R, Wolff R, Hermann E, Zimmermann M, Seifert V. Laser surface scanning for patient registration in intracranial image-guided surgery. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 797-801 , discussion 802–803
  • 7 Lorenz KJ, Frühwald S, Maier H. [The use of the BrainLAB Kolibri navigation system in endoscopic paranasal sinus surgery under local anaesthesia. An analysis of 35 cases]. HNO 2006; 54: 851-860
  • 8 Greenfield JP, Howard BM, Huang C, Boockvar JA. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery using a skull reference array and laser surface scanning. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008; 51: 244-246
  • 9 West J, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY , et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 554-566
  • 10 West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, Maurer Jr CR, Maciunas RJ. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001; 48: 810-816 , discussion 816–817