Endoscopy 2013; 45(12): 1014-1017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344556
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic plastic stenting for bile duct stones: stent changing on demand or every 3 months. A prospective comparison study

Pietro Di Giorgio
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Loreto Mare Hospital, Naples, Italy
,
Gianpiero Manes
2   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Sacco, Milan, Italy
,
Enzo Grimaldi
3   Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital, Caserta, Italy
,
Michele Schettino
4   Department of Gastroenterology, S. Gennaro Hospital, Naples, Italy
,
Alessandra D’Alessandro
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Loreto Mare Hospital, Naples, Italy
,
Andrea Di Giorgio
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Loreto Mare Hospital, Naples, Italy
,
Francesco Giannattasio
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Loreto Mare Hospital, Naples, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 16 April 2012

accepted after revision 25 June 2013

Publication Date:
28 November 2013 (online)

Background and study aims: Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy and stone removal is the standard of care for choledocholithiasis, with a success rate of > 90 %. For stones ≤ 25 mm diameter, mechanical lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy, and laser lithotripsy can be used. In the case of failure, the next step is surgery. In elderly patients and in patients with an elevated surgical risk, stenting is the only treatment modality. In these cases the aim is to avoid the onset of acute obstructive cholangitis. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the best management of plastic stents in patients with biliary duct stones who were unfit for surgery and in whom previous endoscopic therapy had failed.

Methods: Patients who were high surgical risks and in whom stone clearance was not possible due to the number and sizes of stones were included. Between March 2008 and September 2010 all patients were treated with endoscopic plastic biliary stenting at four tertiary care referral centers in Italy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: in Group A (n = 39) plastic stents were changed every 3 months or sooner if symptoms appeared; in Group B plastic stents were changed on demand at the onset of symptoms, and ultrasonography and blood samples were performed every 3 months to check for signs of cholestasis and inflammation. The primary outcome was the rate of cholangitis. The secondary outcome was the rate of stone clearance after a period of stenting.

Results: A total of 78 patients were included in the study (43 M/35F; mean age 76 years). Acute cholangitis occurred in 3 patients from Group A and in 14 patients from Group B (P = 0.03). Mortality related to cholangitis occurred in one patient from Group A and three patients from Group B (P = n.s.). The mean follow-up was 13.5 months (range 2 – 23). Stone clearance after long term stenting occurred in 24 patients from Group A (61.5 %) and in 21 patients from group B (53.8 %) (P = n.s.).

Conclusions: In patients with bile duct stones who were treated with biliary plastic stents, the best stent management to avoid cholangitis was stent changing at defined intervals (every 3 months in the current study). The data confirmed that plastic biliary stenting may decrease stone size with a high percentage of subsequent total stone clearance.

 
  • References

  • 1 Vaira D, Ainley C, Williams S et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 1989; 2: 431-433
  • 2 Lambert ME, Betts CD, Hill J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: the whole truth. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 743-746
  • 3 Hochberger J, Tex S, Maiss J et al. Management of difficult common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13: 623-634
  • 4 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajayama N et al. Biliary stenting in the management of large or multiple common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1200-1203
  • 5 Fan Z, Hawes R, Lawrence C et al. Analysis of plastic stents in the treatment of large common bile duct stones in 45 patients. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 86-90
  • 6 Hong WD, Zhu QH, Huang QK. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoprostheses in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct stones. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 240-243
  • 7 Mayumi T, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al. Results of the Tokyo Consensus Meeting Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14: 114-121
  • 8 Weickert U, Venzke T, Konig J et al. Why do bilioduodenal plastic stents become occluded? A clinical and pathological investigation on 100 consecutive patients. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 786-790
  • 9 Soderlund C, Linder S. Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 986-995
  • 10 Huibregtse K, Tytgat GN. Palliative treatment of obstructive jaundice by transpapillary introduction of large bile duct endoprosthesis. Gut 1982; 23: 371-375
  • 11 Boulay BR, Gardner TB, Gordon SR. Occlusion rate and complications of plastic biliary stent placement in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer with malignant biliary obstruction. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 452-455
  • 12 Li KW, Zhang XW, Ding J et al. A prospective study of the efficacy of endoscopic biliary stenting on common bile duct stones. J Dig Dis 2009; 10: 328-331
  • 13 Maxton DG, Tweedle DEF, Martin DF. Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and long term treatment with biliary stenting. Gut 1995; 36: 446-449
  • 14 Akcakaya A, Ozkan OV, Bas G. et al Mechanical lithotripsy and/or stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct stones. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2009; 8: 524-528
  • 15 Lee SH, Park JK, Yoon WJ. How to predict the outcome of endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones?. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 1006-1010
  • 16 Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB et al. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2330-2334
  • 17 Kastilenos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G et al. Combination of endoprostheses and oral ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo in the treatment of difficult to extract common bile duct stones. Dig Liver Dis 2008; 40: 453-459
  • 18 Jain SK, Stein R, Bhuva M et al. Pigtail stents: an alternative in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 490-493
  • 19 Cerefice M, Sauer B, Javaid M et al. Complex biliary stones: treatment with removable self-expandable metal stents: a new approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 520-526
  • 20 Han J, Moon JH, Komer HC et al. Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2418-2421
  • 21 Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tissen JG et al. Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 195-201
  • 22 Ang TL, Fock KM, Teo EK et al. An audit of the outcome of long-term bilary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct stones in a general hospital. J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 765-771
  • 23 Maxton DG, Tweedle DE, Martin DF. Stenting for choledocholithiasis: temporizing or therapeutic?. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 615-616
  • 24 Pisello F, Geraci G, Li Volsi F et al. Permanent stenting in “unextractable” common bile duct stones in high risk patient. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents. Langhenbecks Arch Surg 2008; 393: 857-863
  • 25 Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al. Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14: 15-26
  • 26 Rahman SH, Larvin M, McMahon MJ et al. Clinical presentation and delayed treatment of cholangitis in older people. Dig Dis Sci 2005; 50: 2207-2210
  • 27 Rosing D, De Virgilio C, Nguyen AT et al. Cholangitis: analysis of admission prognostic indicators and outcomes. Am Surg 2007; 73: 949-954