Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2013; 48(5): 296-299
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1347151
Fachwissen
Intensivmedizin & Notfallmedizin
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Interhospitaltransfer – Klinisches Vorgehen: Ausrüstung, Risiken und Komplikationen

Interhospitaltransfer – clinical approach: equipment, risks and complicationsI
Christoph Melzer-Gartzke
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 June 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Interhospitaltransporte sind Bestandteil unseres Gesundheitssystems und tragen dazu bei, regionale Versorgungsunterschiede auszugleichen und für alle Patienten die bestmögliche Diagnostik und Behandlungsergebnisse zu erreichen. Damit die transportbedingten Risiken kalkulierbar bleiben, bedarf es adäquat geschulter Transportteams und modern ausgestatteter, den regionalen Bedürfnissen aber auch dem demographischen Wandel immer besser angepasster Transportmittel.

Abstract

Interhospitaltransfers are an integral part of German health care system and a prerequisite to provide specialist investigation, management and best possible outcome for all patients irrespective of regional differences in medical care. In order to reduce transport associated risks to a minimum, adequate specialized transport teams and modern equipped transport vehicles are needed better and better adapted to regional and demographic changes.

Ergänzendes Material

 
  • Literaturverzeichnis

  • 1 Fried MJ, Bruce J, Colquhoun R, Smith G. Inter-hospital transfers of acutely ill adults in Scotland. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 136-144
  • 2 Lahner D, Nikolic A, Marhofer P et al. Incidence of complications in intrahospital transport of critically ill patients – experience in an Austrian university hospital. Wien KlinWochenschr 2007; 119: 412-416
  • 3 Wiegersma JS, Droogh JM, Zijlstra JG et al. Quality of interhospital transport of the critically ill: impact of a Mobile Intensive Care Unit with a specialized retrieval team. Crit Care 2011; 15
  • 4 Iwashynaa TJ, Coureya AJ. Guided transfer of critically ill patients: where patients are transferred can be an informed choice. CurrOpinCrit Care 2011; 17: 641-647
  • 5 Reifferscheid F, Gräsner J-T, Höcker J. Interhospitaltransfer – Planung und Vorbereitung von Intensivtransporten/-verlegungen. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2013; 48: 352-356
  • 6 Knobloch K, Dehn I, Khaladj N et al. HEMS vs. EMS transfer for acute aortic dissection type A. Air Med J 2009; 28: 146-153
  • 7 Hill AD, Fowler RA, Nathens AB. Impact of interhospitaltransfer on outcomes for trauma patients: a systematic review. J Trauma 2011; 71
  • 8 Catalano AR, Winn HR, Gordon E, Frontera JA. Impact ofinterhospitaltransfer on complications and outcome after intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17: 324-333
  • 9 Naval NS, Chang T, Caserta F et al. Impact of pattern of admission on outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Crit Care 2012; 27: 1-7
  • 10 Schlechtriemen T, Ruppert M, Anding KH. Empfehlungen der BAND zum arztbegleiteten Interhospitaltransport. Notarzt 2003; 19: 215-219
  • 11 Scholz J, Sefrin P, Böttiger BW et al. Hrsg. Notfallmedizin. Aufl. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme; 2013. 3.
  • 12 Ligtenberg JJM, Arnold LG et al. Quality of interhospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective audit. Crit Care 2005; 9
  • 13 Fanara B, Manzon C, Barbot O, Desmettre T, Capellier G. Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. Critical Care 2010; 14: 87-87
  • 14 Papson JP, Russell KL, Taylor DM. Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. AcadEmerg Med 2007; 14: 574-577
  • 15 DIN 7506 2012: Rettungssysteme – Intensivtransportwagen (ITW) – Begriffe, Anforderungen, Prüfung. Berlin: Beuth; 2012