J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29(09): 579-586
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348036
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Quantitative Assessment of the Motor–Sensory Specificity of the Motor and Primary Sensory Neurons after the End-to-Side Neurorrhaphy

Qing Yu
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
,
Chengwang Chen
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
,
Xiaolei Zhang
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
,
Lei lv
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
,
Kang Lin
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
,
Yonglong Chi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
,
Weiyang Gao
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 September 2012

29 March 2013

Publication Date:
11 June 2013 (online)

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the motor–sensory specificity of the motor and primary sensory neurons after the end-to-side neurorrhaphy. We divided 90 rats into three groups: (1) end-to-side neurorrhaphy using the ulnar nerve as donor nerve and the musculocutaneous nerve as recipient nerve; (2) normal control; and (3) transected nerve with the stumps buried. At 5 months, we monitored the grooming test, the electromyographic recordings, the histologic changes in the nerve, and quantitatively evaluated motoneurons and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons following their retrograde labeling by Fluoro-Gold (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) applied to the musculocutaneous nerve and its biceps brachii branch. Grooming and electrophysiological investigations recovered successfully in the end-to-side group. The implanted musculocutaneous nerve contained varying but satisfactory numbers of axons. In the end-to-side group, the proportion of motoneurons for the biceps brachii branch of musculocutaneous nerve was very similar to the musculocutaneous nerve sections proximal to this branch (17.3% ± 2.7% and 21.7% ± 3.7%, respectively), but it did not correspond with the proportion of the biceps brachii branch of musculocutaneous nerve in the normal group (28.3% ± 3.5%). The present study confirms that limited but functional reinnervation can occur after the end-to-side neurorrhaphy, and the motor–sensory specificity is not important.

 
  • References

  • 1 Viterbo F, Trindade JC, Hoshino K, Mazzoni Neto A. Latero-terminal neurorrhaphy without removal of the epineural sheath. Experimental study in rats. Rev Paul Med 1992; 110 (6) 267-275
  • 2 Brushart TM. Motor axons preferentially reinnervate motor pathways. J Neurosci 1993; 13 (6) 2730-2738
  • 3 Brushart TM, Jari R, Verge V, Rohde C, Gordon T. Electrical stimulation restores the specificity of sensory axon regeneration. Exp Neurol 2005; 194 (1) 221-229
  • 4 Bertelli JA, Mira JC. Behavioral evaluating methods in the objective clinical assessment of motor function after experimental brachial plexus reconstruction in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 1993; 46 (3) 203-208
  • 5 Haastert K, Lipokatic E, Fischer M, Timmer M, Grothe C. Differentially promoted peripheral nerve regeneration by grafted Schwann cells over-expressing different FGF-2 isoforms. Neurobiol Dis 2006; 21 (1) 138-153
  • 6 Yu Q, Lin ZK, Ding J, Wang T, Chi YL, Gao WY. Functional motor nerve regeneration without motor-sensory specificity following end-to-side neurorrhaphy: an experimental study. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (12) 2010-2016
  • 7 Sámal F, Haninec P, Raska O, Dubovỳ P. Quantitative assessment of the ability of collateral sprouting of the motor and primary sensory neurons after the end-to-side neurorrhaphy of the rat musculocutaneous nerve with the ulnar nerve. Ann Anat 2006; 188 (4) 337-344
  • 8 Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 1998; 45 (1) 116-122
  • 9 Selecki BR, Ring IT, Simpson DA, Vanderfield GK, Sewell MF. Trauma to the central and peripheral nervous systems. Part II: A statistical profile of surgical treatment New South Wales 1977. Aust N Z J Surg 1982; 52 (2) 111-116
  • 10 Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Peripheral nerve injury and repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8 (4) 243-252
  • 11 Viterbo F, Trindade JC, Hoshino K, Mazzoni Neto A. End-to-side neurorrhaphy with removal of the epineurial sheath: an experimental study in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94 (7) 1038-1047
  • 12 Lundborg G, Zhao Q, Kanje M, Danielsen N, Kerns JM. Can sensory and motor collateral sprouting be induced from intact peripheral nerve by end-to-side anastomosis?. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994; 19 (3) 277-282
  • 13 Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Nerve repair by end-to-side coaptation or fascicular transfer: a clinical study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (5) 313-318
  • 14 Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Concepts of nerve regeneration and repair applied to brachial plexus reconstruction. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (4) 230-244
  • 15 Kalliainen LK, Cederna PS, Kuzon Jr WM. Mechanical function of muscle reinnervated by end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (7) 1919-1927
  • 16 Hayashi A, Pannucci C, Moradzadeh A , et al. Axotomy or compression is required for axonal sprouting following end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Exp Neurol 2008; 211 (2) 539-550
  • 17 Dvali LT, Myckatyn TM. End-to-side nerve repair: review of the literature and clinical indications. Hand Clin 2008; 24 (4) 455-460, vii
  • 18 Brushart TM. Preferential reinnervation of motor nerves by regenerating motor axons. J Neurosci 1988; 8 (3) 1026-1031
  • 19 Brushart TM, Gerber J, Kessens P, Chen YG, Royall RM. Contributions of pathway and neuron to preferential motor reinnervation. J Neurosci 1998; 18 (21) 8674-8681