Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014; 24(06): 492-499
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357299
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Longitudinal Study of Lower Urinary Tract Function in Children with Anorectal Malformation

Helena Borg
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Gundela Holmdahl
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Monica Doroszkievicz
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Ulla Sillen
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 May 2013

20 August 2013

Publication Date:
10 October 2013 (online)

Abstract

Neurogenic bladder dysfunction (NBD) in children with anorectal malformation (ARM) has been reported in many publications, but with variations in prevalence and connection to type of ARM and spinal cord/sacral malformations. The prevalence of ARM patients with functional nonneurogenic dysfunction, on the contrary, has been addressed only sparsely. Since constipation and soiling have been shown to often accompany functional urinary tract symptoms in children without malformations, and treatment of constipation often improves bladder symptoms, it is interesting to assess such a connection in ARM patients. This study assessed lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) overall in ARM children. Special attention was paid to whether patients with poor bowel function had more LUT symptoms, excluding those with urological reasons for the LUTD (NBD and urogenital malformations).

Patients and Methods Children with ARM, excluding those with perineal fistula, were included (n = 41). Bladder function was investigated at 5 (n = 25), 10 (n = 28), and 15 (n = 13) years using a structured questionnaire and flow residual. A scoring system was used. In addition, healthy children of comparable age were assessed using the same questionnaire. Data on bowel function were also available, as presented in a recent article. In children with NBD, cystometry was also used at follow-up.

Results NBD was seen in 9 children (22%), whereas nonneurogenic LUTD was diagnosed in 14 cases (34%). A clear difference between the groups was seen, with a permanent dysfunction in neurogenic and often transient and mild in the nonneurogenic LUTD. A significant correlation between LUTD and bowel dysfunction was identified when all LUTD was included (p = 0.045). When children with neurogenic and urological causes of LUTD were excluded, the remaining children with LUTD had lower scores for bowel function than those with normal bladder function, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.1291).

Conclusion Poor bowel function was often seen together with LUTD. In children with NBD, the connection was attributable to a mutual impairment of the nerve supply to both systems. Children with nonneurogenic and nonurological causes of the LUTD also had lower bowel scores than those with normal bladder function; although not significant, it suggests that poor bowel function was responsible for an increase in LUT symptoms.

 
  • References

  • 1 Borg H, Holmdahl G, Olsson I, Wiklund LM, Sillén U. Impact of spinal cord malformation on bladder function in children with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (9) 1778-1785
  • 2 Averbeck MA, Madersbacher H. Constipation and LUTS—how do they affect each other?. Int Braz J Urol 2011; 37 (1) 16-28
  • 3 Borg HC, Holmdahl G, Gustavsson K, Doroszkiewicz M, Sillén U. Longitudinal study of bowel function in children with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (3) 597-606
  • 4 Nevéus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P , et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children's Continence Society. J Urol 2006; 176 (1) 314-324
  • 5 Sillén U, Hellstrom A. Pragmatic approach to the evaluation and management of non-neuropathic daytime voiding disorders. In: Gearhart JP, Rink RC, Mouriquand PDE, , eds. Pediatric Urology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2010: 366-379
  • 6 Farhat W, Bägli DJ, Capolicchio G , et al. The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol 2000; 164 (3, Pt 2) 1011-1015
  • 7 Sillén U, Brandström P, Jodal U , et al. The Swedish reflux trial in children: v. Bladder dysfunction. J Urol 2010; 184 (1) 298-304
  • 8 Rintala RJ, Lindahl H. Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations?. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30 (3) 491-494
  • 9 Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG, Rasanen M. Do children with repaired low anorectal malformations have normal bowel function?. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (6) 823-826
  • 10 Kajiwara M, Inoue K, Usui A, Kurihara M, Usui T. The micturition habits and prevalence of daytime urinary incontinence in Japanese primary school children. J Urol 2004; 171 (1) 403-407
  • 11 Burgers R, Liem O, Canon S , et al. Effect of rectal distention on lower urinary tract function in children. J Urol 2010; 184 (4, Suppl): 1680-1685
  • 12 Loening-Baucke V. Urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection and their resolution with treatment of chronic constipation of childhood. Pediatrics 1997; 100 (2, Pt 1) 228-232
  • 13 Koff SA, Wagner TT, Jayanthi VR. The relationship among dysfunctional elimination syndromes, primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections in children. J Urol 1998; 160 (3, Pt 2) 1019-1022
  • 14 Taskinen S, Valanne L, Rintala R. Effect of spinal cord abnormalities on the function of the lower urinary tract in patients with anorectal abnormalities. J Urol 2002; 168 (3) 1147-1149
  • 15 Suppiej A, Dal Zotto L, Cappellari A , et al. Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25 (10) 851-855
  • 16 Goossens WJ, de Blaauw I, Wijnen MH, de Gier RP, Kortmann B, Feitz WF. Urological anomalies in anorectal malformations in The Netherlands: effects of screening all patients on long-term outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27 (10) 1091-1097
  • 17 Stathopoulos E, Muehlethaler V, Rais M , et al. Preoperative assessment of neurovesical function in children with anorectal malformation: association with vertebral and spinal malformations. J Urol 2012; 188 (3) 943-947
  • 18 Yeung CK, Godley ML, Ho CK , et al. Some new insights into bladder function in infancy. Br J Urol 1995; 76 (2) 235-240
  • 19 Bachelard M, Sillén U, Hansson S, Hermansson G, Jodal U, Jacobsson B. Urodynamic pattern in asymptomatic infants: siblings of children with vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 1999; 162 (5) 1733-1737 , discussion 1737–1738
  • 20 Boemers TM, van Gool JD, de Jong TP, Bax KM. Urodynamic evaluation of children with the caudal regression syndrome (caudal dysplasia sequence). J Urol 1994; 151 (4) 1038-1040
  • 21 Maerzheuser S, Jenetzky E, Zwink N , et al. German network for congenital uro-rectal malformations: first evaluation and interpretation of postoperative urological complications in anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27 (10) 1085-1089
  • 22 Suppiej A, Dal Zotto L, Cappellari A , et al. Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25 (10) 851-855