Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2013; 122(9): 444-450
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1360468
Fortbildung
CAD / CAM
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Digitaler Workflow in der Implantologie – Vorbericht zum Keramik-Symposium 2013

M Kern
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 October 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

In der Implantatversorgung treffen sich mehrere HighTech-Verfahren: Computergestützte Diagnostik und OP-Vorbereitung, CAD/CAM-Konstruktion und moderne Prothetikwerkstoffe sind die neuen Wegzeichen. Nirgendwo in der Zahnmedizin griff der Wandel so breitgefächert und umfassend ein. Auf mehreren Ebenen haben Digitaltechnik und neue Behandlungsmethoden die Implantatversorgung grundlegend verändert. Dr. Karl-Ludwig Ackermann, Vorstandsmitglied der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Implantologie (DGI), wird am 30. November 2013 auf dem 13. Keramik-Symposium der AG Keramik in Frankfurt/Main im Rahmen seines Vortrags „Digitaler Workflow und Langzeitbewährung für keramische Restaurationen auf Implantaten“ über die vielfältigen Einsatzmöglichkeiten der Digitaltechnik und der Keramikwerkstoffe sprechen. Dieser Vorbericht wird das Referatthema lediglich skizzieren. Das klinische Vorgehen und die erzielten Ergebnisse werden vom Referenten auf dem Symposium vorgetragen.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ackermann KL, Kirsch A, Nagel R et al. Mit Backward Planning zielsicher therapieren. Teil 1. Teamwork 2008; 4: 466-484
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wöstmann B. Der Weg in die Zukunft. Die Zahnarzt-Woche 2012; 10: 10-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wöstmann B, Seelbach P. Abformung konventionell oder digital. Quintessenz 2012; 63: 1567-1575
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Godt A, Bechtold TE, Schaupp E et al. Correlation between occlusal abnormalities and parameters investigates by three-dimensional facial photography. Angle Orthod (Epub ahead of print) 08.03.2013; 63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ackermann KL, Becker J, Schär A. Implantologie – die richtige Verbindung. Expertenzirkel – ein Thema, drei Meinungen. Dent Mag 2010; 5: 58-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schweiger J, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M et al. Moderne Wege zum Implantat-Abutment. Zahnärztl Mitteilungen 2012; 20: 54-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH et al. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Rest Dent 2007; 27: 251-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Müller HP, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa and periodontal phenotype; a review. Int J Periodontics Rest Dent 2002; 22: 172-183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Prestipino V, Ingber A. Esthetic high strength implant abutments – part II. J Esthet Dent 1993; 5: 63-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R et al. In vivo fracture resistance of implant supported all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 325-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Andersson B, Glauser R, Maglione M et al. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 640-646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Att W, Kurun S, Gerds T et al. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 380-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A et al. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions; 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 285-290
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A et al. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps. J Periodontal 2006; 77: 73-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry; an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 505-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Blatz MB, Bergler M, Holst S et al. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implants; rationale and clinical guidelines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 74-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulos T, Pelekanos S et al. Zirconia in dentistry; part 2. Evidence based clinical breaktrough. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009; 4: 348-380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE et al. Single-tooth implant reconstructions; esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007; 2: 296-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions; 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 802-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kern M, Kohal RJ, Mehl A et al. Vollkeramik auf einen Blick; Leitfaden zur Indikation, Werkstoffauswahl, Vorbereitung und Eingliederung von vollkeramischen Restaurationen; Überlebensraten von Implantatprothetik. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Keramik in der Zahnheilkunde e.V. 2012;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett Jr LH et al. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single-tooth implant restorations; influence of material selection für type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 195-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ebert A, Hedderich J, Kern M. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 921-927
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P et al. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontal 2003; 74: 1785-1788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Vaccaro F et al. Retrospective clinical evaluation of 86 Procera AllCeram anterior single crowns on natural and implant-supported abuments. Clin Implant Relat Res 2007; 7 (Suppl. 01)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Koutayas SO, Mitsias M, Wolfart S et al. Influence of preparation mode and depth on the fracture strength of zirconia ceramic abutments restored with lithium disilicate crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 839-848
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tinschert J, Schulze KA, Natt G et al. Clinical behaviour of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures; 3-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 217-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Larsson C, Vult van Steyern P. Five-year follow-up of implant-supported Y-TZP and ZTA fixed dental prostheses – a randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two different material systems. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 555-561
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007; 18: 86-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pröbster L, Kern M. Zirkonoxid-Monolithen, ein Faszinosum? Der Trend zu vollanatomischen Oxidkeramik-Kronen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2012; 67: 777-782
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Holst S, Geiselhöringer H, Nkenke E et al. CAD/CAM und Implantologie, eine erfolgreiche Kooperation. Digital Dentistry 2013; 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K et al. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 121-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE et al. Complication and failure rates with implant supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and single crowns (SCs) – a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat DOI: 10.1111/cid.12066. 2013;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ekfeldt A, Fürst B, Carlsson GE. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant resorations – a retrospective and clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1308-1314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kim SS, Yeo IS, Lee SJ et al. Clinical use of alumina-toughened zirconia abutments for implant-supported restorations – prospective cohort study of survival analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 517-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zembic A, Bösch A, Jung RE et al. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 24: 384-390
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bonstein MM, Halbritter S, Hanisch H et al. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic – indications, surgical procedures and early failures. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1109-1116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar