Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2014; 46(01): 9-11
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367053
Übersichtsartikel
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prävalenz dentaler Agenesie bleibender Zähne – eine Literaturübersicht

Prevalence of Dental Agenesis of Permanent Teeth – A Literature Review
F. Feltl
1   Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Bernhard-Gottlieb-Universitätszahnklinik, Wien, Österreich
,
H.-P. Bantleon
1   Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Bernhard-Gottlieb-Universitätszahnklinik, Wien, Österreich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 April 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Nichtanlagen bleibender Zähne stellen eine in der kieferorthopädischen Praxis nicht selten anzutreffende Behandlungsindikation dar, die meist einer interdisziplinären Therapie bedarf und so mit höheren Kosten sowohl für Patient als auch für das Gesundheitswesen verbunden ist. Die vorliegende Arbeit bietet eine Übersicht über die in der Literatur auffindbaren Häufigkeitsangaben zu Nichtanlagen bleibender Zähne – unter Berücksichtigung der ethnischen Herkunft und des jeweiligen Geschlechtes. Darüber hinaus werden Prävalenzangaben hinsichtlich des betroffenen Kiefers, Zahntyps, uni- oder bilateralen Auftretens sowie der Anzahl der fehlenden Zähne vorgestellt.

Abstract

Agenesis of permanent teeth, not seldom to be encountered in an orthodontic practice, requires interdisciplinary treatment, which means higher costs for the patient as well as for the health care system. This article provides an accurate review of the literature concerning the prevalence of agenesis in the permanent dentition, regarding both the ethnical background and the gender of the patient population. Furthermore, data about the occurrence of dental agenesis with respect to the affected jaw, the affected tooth, unilateral or bilateral presence and the number of missing teeth are presented.

Schlüsselwörter

dentale Agenesie - bleibende Dentition

Key words

dental agenesis - permanent dentition
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Schalck-van der Weide Y. Oligodontia: a clinical, radiographic and genetic evaluation, dissertation. Utrecht: University of Utrecht; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Moorrees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt Jr EE. Age variaton of formation stages for the permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1963; 42: 1490-1502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Prahl-Andersen B, Van der Linden FPGM. The estimation of dental age. Trans Eur Orthod Sox 1 1972; 535-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ravn JJ, Nielsen HG. A longitudinal radiographic study of the mineralization of 2nd premolars. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85: 232-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cunat JJ, Colord J. Late-developing premolars: report of 2 cases. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 87: 183-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fass EN. Aberrant second premolars. J Dent Child 1971; 37: 494-498
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Harzer W. Kieferorthopädie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2011
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brook AH. A unifying aetiological explanation for anomalies of human tooth number and size. Arch et al. Biol 1984; 29: 373-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Erther R, Rothenberger F. Anodontia, a review of its etiology with presentation of case. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1939; 25: 61-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kjaer I, Nodal M, Christensen LR. Aetiological aspects of mandibular tooth agenesis focussing on the role of nerve, oral mucosa and supporting tissues. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 371-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kjaer I. Neuro-osteology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998; 9: 224-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grahnén H. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. A clinical and genetic investigation. Odont Rev 1956; 7: 1-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vastardis H, Karimbux N, Guthua SW et al. A human MSX1 homeodomain missence mutation causes selective tooth agenesis. Nat Genet 1996; 13: 417-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kurisu K, Tabata MJ. Human genes for dental anomalies. Oral Dis 1997; 3: 223-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mahaney MC, Fjiwara TM, Morgan K. Dental agenesis in the Dariusleut Hutterite Brethren: comparisons to selected Caucasoid population surveys. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990; 82: 165-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rosenzweig KA, Garbaski D. Numerical aberrations in the permanent teeth of grade school children in Jerusalem. Am J Phys Antropol 1965; 23: 277-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FPGM et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32: 217-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Eidelman E, Chosack A, Rosenzweig KA. Hypodontia: prevalence amongst Jewish populations of different origin. Am J Phys Anthropol 1973; 39: 129-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Niswander JD, Sujaku C. Congenital anomalies of teeth in Japanese children. Am J Phys Anthropol 1963; 21: 569-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schalk-van der Weide Y, Stehen WHA, Beemer FA et al. Reduction in size and left-right asymmetry of teeth in human oligodontia. Arch Oral Biol 1994; 39: 935-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res 1973; 81: 12-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ringqvist M, Thilander B. The frequency of hypodontia in an orthodontic material. Sven Tandlaek Tidskr 1969; 62: 535-541
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Aasheim B, Ögaard B. Hypodontia in 9-year-old Norwegians related to need of orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res 1993; 101: 257-260
    PubMedGoogle Scholar