Download PDF
Endoscopy 2014; 46(09): 791-794
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377510
DDW Highlights
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopy innovations

Geoffroy Vanbiervliet
1   LBA UMRT24, Aix-Marseille University, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France
2   Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
,
Jean-Michel Gonzalez
1   LBA UMRT24, Aix-Marseille University, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France
3   Gastroenterology, Public Assistance Hospitals of Marseille, Marseille, France
,
Marc Barthet
1   LBA UMRT24, Aix-Marseille University, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France
3   Gastroenterology, Public Assistance Hospitals of Marseille, Marseille, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 August 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Innovation everywhere for everybody – this is the way we can summarize the 2014 Digestive Disease Week, which was held in Chicago, Illinois, last May. Many sessions introduced new innovative materials and concepts. From the robot of the future to the simplest ideas, the congress was fertile and sometimes full of surprises. Abstracts representing significant progress and innovations in the field of digestive endoscopy are reviewed here.

 

  • References

  • 1 Kirtane TS, Wagh MS. Endoscopic optical coherence tomography (OCT): advances in gastrointestinal imaging. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014; 2014 DOI: 10.1155/2014/376367.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gora MJ, Soomr AR, Puricelli WP et al. Unsedated screening for Barrett’s esophagus using tethered capsule endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Almadi MA, Barkun AN, Martel M. No benefit of covered vs uncovered self-expandable metal stents in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 27-37 (e21)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yang Z, Wu Q, Wang F et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and prospective studies comparing covered and bare self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of malignant obstruction in the digestive tract. Int J Med Sci 2013; 10: 825-835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Song TJ, Lee SS, Yun SC et al. Paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective comparative pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 727-733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zhang Y, Zhining F. Paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents for esophageal squamous carcinoma in rabbits. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Huang J, Zhang Y, Zhong H et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal implantation vs. surgical intramuscular implantation of VX2 fragments for establishing a rabbit esophageal tumor model for mimicking human esophageal squamous carcinoma. PLoS One 2014; 9: e85326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jang SI, Kim JH, Kim M et al. Porcine feasibility and safety study of a new paclitaxel-eluting biliary stent with a Pluronic-containing membrane. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 825-831
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kantsevoy SV, Bitner M, Mitrakov AA et al. Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 503-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kumar N, Ryan MB, Gostout CJ et al. Nationwide Endoscopic Suturing Registry: interim activity report. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Singhal S, Changela K, Lane D et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepatic and perihepatic abscess drainage: an evolving technique. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2014; 7: 93-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moshkowitz N, Arber N. Safety and proof of concept demonstrated with a novel prep-less X-ray imaging capsule for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rhim AD, Thege FI, Santana SM et al. Detection of circulating pancreas epithelial cells in patients with pancreatic cystic lesions. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 647-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Waxman I, Koons A, Konda VJ et al. Detection of portal vein (PV) circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients obtained by EUS guided PV sampling. A safety and feasibility trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Giday SA, Clarke JO, Buscaglia JM et al. EUS-guided portal vein catheterization: a promising novel approach for portal angiography and portal vein pressure measurements. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 338-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1189-1196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ et al. A pilot study of EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy (EUSTTNB) of solid masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Khashab MA, Stein E, Clarke JO et al. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: first human endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 764-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chaves DM, de Moura EG, Mestieri LH et al. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy through a gastric submucosal tunnel dissection for the treatment of gastroparesis after surgical vagal lesion. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar