Automatic optical diagnosis of small colorectal lesions by laser-induced autofluorescence

Background and study aims: Endoscopic optical diagnosis can potentially replace histopathological evaluation of small colorectal lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of WavSTAT, a novel system for automatic optical diagnosis based on laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy.

Patients and methods: Consecutive patients who were scheduled for colonoscopy were included in the study. Each detected lesion with a size of ≤ 9 mm was differentiated using high resolution endoscopy (HRE) by the endoscopist, who then reported this as a low or high confidence call. Thereafter, all lesions were analyzed using WavSTAT. Histopathology was used as the reference standard. The primary outcome measures were the accuracy of WavSTAT to differentiate between adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions, and the accuracy of an algorithm combining HRE (lesions differentiated with high confidence) and WavSTAT (all remaining lesions). The secondary outcome measure was the accuracy of on-site recommended surveillance intervals.

Results: At total of 87 patients with 207 small colorectal lesions were evaluated. Accuracy and negative predictive value of WavSTAT were 74.4 % and 73.5 %, respectively. The corresponding figures for the algorithm were 79.2 % and 73.9 %, respectively. Accuracy of on-site recommended surveillance interval was 73.7 % for WavSTAT alone and 77.2 % for the algorithm of HRE and WavSTAT.

Conclusions: Both accuracy of WavSTAT alone and the algorithm combining HRE with WavSTAT proved to be insufficient for the in vivo differentiation of small colorectal lesions, and do not fulfill American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance thresholds for assessment of diminutive lesions. Future studies should assess whether combining WavSTAT with more advanced imaging techniques could result in a higher accuracy.

Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR 3235).

• References

• 1 Monkemuller K, Fry LC, Zimmermann L et al. Advanced endoscopic imaging methods for colon neoplasia. Dig Dis 2010; 28: 629-640
• 2 Van den Broek FJ, Fockens P, Dekker E. Review article: New developments in colonic imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 91-99
• 3 Chang CC, Hsieh CR, Lou HY et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, magnifying chromoendoscopy, and magnifying narrow-band imaging systems in the differential diagnosis of small colonic polyps between trainee and experienced endoscopist. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1413-1419
• 4 Chiu HM, Chang CY, Chen CC et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2007; 56: 373-379
• 5 East JE, Suzuki N, Bassett P et al. Narrow band imaging with magnification for the characterization of small and diminutive colonic polyps: pit pattern and vascular pattern intensity. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 811-817
• 6 Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S et al. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1089-1093
• 7 Katagiri A, Fu KI, Sano Y et al. Narrow band imaging with magnifying colonoscopy as diagnostic tool for predicting histology of early colorectal neoplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1269-1274
• 8 Rastogi A, Keighley J, Singh V et al. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2422-2430
• 9 Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1174-1181
• 10 Tischendorf JJ, Wasmuth HE, Koch A et al. Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1092-1096
• 11 Wada Y, Kudo SE, Kashida H et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 522-531
• 12 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1171-1178
• 13 Richards-Kortum R, Rava RP, Petras RE et al. Spectroscopic diagnosis of colonic dysplasia. Photochem Photobiol 1991; 53: 777-786
• 14 Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-625
• 15 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 3-43
• 16 Nagengast FM, Kaandorp CJ. [Revised CBO guideline ‘Follow-up after polypectomy’]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001; 145: 2022-2025
• 17 Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut 2010; 59: 666-689
• 18 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
• 19 Vakiani E, Yantiss RK. Pathologic features and biologic importance of colorectal serrated polyps. Adv Anat Pathol 2009; 16: 79-91
• 20 Wong NA, Hunt LP, Novelli MR et al. Observer agreement in the diagnosis of serrated polyps of the large bowel. Histopathology 2009; 55: 63-66
• 21 Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 40-44
• 22 Kuiper T, Marsman WA, Jansen JM et al. Accuracy for optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in nonacademic settings. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1016-1020
• 23 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect. Gut 2008; 57: 59-64
• 24 Rogart JN, Jain D, Siddiqui UD et al. Narrow-band imaging without high magnification to differentiate polyps during real-time colonoscopy: improvement with experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1136-1145
• 25 Fleiss JL, Nee JCM, Landis JR. Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. Psychological Bulletin 1979; 86: 974-977
• 26 Benes Z, Antos Z. Optical biopsy system distinguishing between hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps in the colon during colonoscopy. Anticancer Res 2009; 29: 4737-4739
• 27 Rex DK, Overhiser AJ, Chen SC et al. Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 149-153
• 28 Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1100-1105
• 29 Sikka S, Ringold DA, Jonnalagadda S et al. Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magnification. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 818-822
• 30 Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 593-602
• 31 Sato R, Fujiya M, Watari J et al. The diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for differentially diagnosing colon adenoma. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 862-868
• 32 Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2711-2716
• 33 Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut 2010; 59: 666-689
• 34 Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 419-422